Skip to main content

In[the Hate Booth]: A Case Study on How to Deal with Online Hate Speech

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspectives on Design and Digital Communication IV

Abstract

In today's hyper-connected world, digital games and online gaming communities occupy a prominent place in the communication system, in social media, forums or Internet communities, where online hate speech (OHS) takes place, frequently and publicly, triggering toxic environments. In this chapter we present a case study based on interviews, distributed in two sessions, to ten participants with 12 and 13 years old, and an experience over the SG In[The Hate Booth], as a counterproposal to address OHS. The qualitative data approaches three aspects: the experiences with OHS, the perspectives about OHS and the possible solutions to counteract OHS. We conclude that OHS is a common complaint from players and a characteristic behavior in game communities. Data shows that even users who don’t identify themselves with this behavior accept it as part of online environments and agree that this toxicity continues outside the in-game screen with effects in everyday life. The pedagogical approach, namely through SG, is perceived as a possible measure to counteract the OHS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.dn.pt/sociedade/tres-jovens-de-16-anos-detidos-por-agressoes-A-imigrante-nepales-em-olhao---psp-15831311.html.

References

  1. Huizinga J (2003) Homo Ludens: um estudo sobre o elemento lúdico da cultura. Edições 70, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gee JP (2003) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Martinez K, Menéndez-Menéndez MI, Bustillo A (2022) A new measure for serious games evaluation: gaming educational balanced (GEB) model. Appl Sci 12:11757. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Salen K, Zimmerman E (2003) Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caillois R (2017) Os jogos e os homens: a máscara e a vertigem. Editora Vozes, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pearce C (2009) Communities of play. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Marsh T (2011) Serious games continuum: between games for purpose and experiential environments for purpose. Entertain Comput 2:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2010.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bayart C, Bertezene S, Vallat D, Martin J (2014) Serious games: leverage for knowledge management. TQM J 26. https://doi.org /https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2013-0143

  9. Zin, N. A. M., W. S. Y.: Design and evaluation of history digital game-based learning (DGBL) software. Journal of Next Generation Information Technology 4.4 (2013) 9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Uyheng J, Carley K (2021) Characterizing network dynamics of online hate communities around the COVID-19 pandemic. Appl Netw Sci 20(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-021-00362-x

  11. Gagliardone I, Gal D, Alves T, Martinez G (2015) Countering online hate Speech. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris (2015). https://bit.ly/3pFWTjp

  12. Council of Europe: Recommendation CM/Rec (2022) 16 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on combating hate speech. Strasbourg (May 2022) bit.ly/3Zf3cJS last accessed 2023/03/25.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wachs S, Wettstein A, Bilz L, Gámez-Guadix M (2022) Adolescents’ motivations to perpetrate hate speech and links with social norms. Comunicar 71:9–20. https://doi.org/10.3916/C71-2022-01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sellars A (2016) Defining hate speech. Berkman klein center research publication, 2016–20, pp. 16–48 Boston University School of Law (2016). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2882244

  15. Yin RK (2014) Case study research design and methods, 5th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clandinin DJ, Rosiek J (2007) Mapping a landscape of narrative inquiry: borderland spaces and tensions. In Clandinin DJ (Ed.) Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology, pp. 35–75. Sage Publishing. https://bit.ly/3sjNXSP

  17. Leavy P (2009) Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Riessman CK (1993) Narrative analysis. Sage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Algarve: Números em Destaque: População estrangeira residente. CCDR Algarve, Faro (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Citron, D. & Norton, H.: Intermediaries and Hate Speech: Fostering Digital Citizenship for Our Information Age. Boston University Law Review, V. 91 (2011). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1764004

  21. Organized Nations General Assembly: Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). New York: 1948 https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication is financed by national funds through the projects “UIBD/04019/2020 CIAC” and “UI/BD/150850/2021” of the Foundation for Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Mendes da Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Costa, S., Tavares, M., Bidarra, J., da Silva, B.M. (2024). In[the Hate Booth]: A Case Study on How to Deal with Online Hate Speech. In: Martins, N., Brandão, D., Fernandes-Marcos, A. (eds) Perspectives on Design and Digital Communication IV. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41770-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41770-2_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41769-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41770-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics