Abstract
We expand on the work of Redmond et al. ( P. Redmond, A. Heffernan, L. Abawi, A. Brown, and R. Henderson, “An online engagement framework for higher education,” Online Learning, vol. 22, no. 1, 2018.) and their proposal of an Online Engagement Framework for Higher Education, setting the stage for an investigation into online course designs and pedagogical methods likely to foster increased student social engagement, confidence, and resilience in the online learning process. Our research builds on the student-engagement themes proposed by Redmond et al.: cognitive, behavioral, collaborative, and emotional engagement; we see these as forms of students’ capital that can be facilitated by online course design and instruction. This capital, in turn, helps foster students’ social engagement, which is linked to better learning outcomes, increased confidence, and resilience in the online learning process. Following a meta-analysis of contemporary literature on distance education, we draw on the community of inquiry and community of practice frameworks, identifying ways to measure these constructs. As such, we propose a new model — the Community Engagement Framework for Online Learners, which can be tested with survey data to identify elements of online course design and instruction most likely to influence students’ engagement. In doing so, we also theorize that a hybrid campus can be achieved for online learners through increased social engagement, which should likely, in turn, increase their confidence and resilience in the online learning process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Shea, P., Bidjerano, T.: Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Comput. Educ. 59(2), 316–326 (2012)
Toma, R., Mhamed, A.A.S.: The power of synchronous sessions in distance education: building community and resilience in the age of COVID-19. In: Guralnick, D., Auer, M.E., Poce, A. (eds.) Innovative Approaches to Technology-Enhanced Learning for the Workplace and Higher Education. TLIC 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 581, pp. 433–445. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21569-8_41
Beals, R., Zimny, S., Lyons, F., Bobbitt, O.: Activating social capital: how peer and socio-emotional mentoring facilitate resilience and success for community college students. In: Frontiers in Education, vol. 6 (2021)
Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., Henderson, R.: An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learn. 22(1), 183–204 (2018)
Toma, R., Berge, M.: Online teaching in a time of crisis: social capital and community building tools. Int. J. Adv. Corp. Learn. 16(1), 65–77 (2023)
Shea, P., Vickers, J., Hayes, S.: Online instructional effort measured through the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: a re-examination of measures and approach. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distribut. Learn. 11(3), 127 (2010)
Shea, P., Bidjerano, T.: Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster ‘epistemic engagement’ and ‘cognitive presence’ in online education. Comput. Educ. 52(3), 543–553 (2009)
Shea, P., Bidjerano, T.: Learning presence: towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Comput. Educ. 55(4), 1721–1731 (2010)
Shea, P., et al.: A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: social network and content analysis. Internet High. Educ. 13(1–2), 10–21 (2010)
Shea, P., et al.: Learning presence: Additional research on a new conceptual element within the community of inquiry (COI) framework. Internet High. Educ. 15(2), 89–95 (2012)
Biccard, P.: A distributed perspective on the community-of-inquiry framework for distance education. UnisaRxiv (Preprint) (2021)
Smith, S.U., Hayes, S., Shea, P.: A critical review of the use of Wenger’s community of practice (COP) theoretical framework in online and blended learning research, 2000–2014. Online Learn. 21(1) (2017)
Cottingham, M.D.: Theorizing emotional capital. Theory Soc. 45(5), 451–470 (2016)
Tanner, K.D.: Promoting student metacognition. CBE—Life Sci. Educ. 11(2), 113–120 (2012)
Fensie, A.: A conceptual model for meeting the needs of adult learners in distance education. In: Guralnick, D., Auer, M.E., Poce, A. (eds.) Innovative Approaches to Technology-Enhanced Learning for the Workplace and Higher Education. TLIC 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 581, pp. 136–149. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21569-8_13
CDW, “Benefits of Esports in schools,” CDW, 24-Jan-2020. https://www.cdw.com/content/cdw/en/articles/hardware/the-benefits-of-an-esports-team-in-k12-and-higher-education.html. Accessed 24 Jan 2023
Mannion, A.: Participation in student activities linked to academic success. Chicago Tribune, 22-May-2019. https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/la-grange/ct-dlg-student-activities-tl-0324-20160317-story.html. Accessed 24 Jan 2023
Moschetti, R., Hudley, C.: Measuring social capital among first-generation and non-first-generation, working-class, white males. J. College Admission (2007). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ829418. Accessed 25 Jan 2023
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Toma, R., Berge, M. (2023). Proposing a Hybrid Campus: A Community Engagement Framework for Online Learners. In: Guralnick, D., Auer, M.E., Poce, A. (eds) Creative Approaches to Technology-Enhanced Learning for the Workplace and Higher Education. TLIC 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 767. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41637-8_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41637-8_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41636-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41637-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)