Skip to main content

Resource Allocation in Recommender Systems for Global KPI Improvement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Forum (BPM 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 490))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 565 Accesses

Abstract

Process-aware Recommender systems are information systems designed to monitor the execution of processes, predict their outcomes, and suggest effective interventions to achieve better results, with respect to reference KPIs (Key Performance Indicators). Interventions typically consist of suggesting an activity to be assigned to a certain resource. State of the art typically proposes interventions for single cases in isolation. However, since resources are shared among cases, this might impact the effectiveness of the available interventions for other cases that would require one. As result, the overall KPI improvement is partially hampered. This paper proposes an approach to assign resources to needed cases, aiming to improve the overall KPI values for all cases together, namely the summation of KPI values for all cases. Experiments conducted on two real-life case studies illustrate that globally considering all needing cases together allows a better global KPI improvement, compared with a more greedy approach where interventions are proposed one after the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The operator * refers to the Kleene star: given a set A, \(A^*\) contains all the possible finite sequences of elements belonging to A.

  2. 2.

    Given a trace \(\sigma \), \(|\sigma |\) indicates the number of events in \(\sigma \).

  3. 3.

    Code available at https://github.com/Pado123/prescriptive_global_optimization.

  4. 4.

    https://www.win.tue.nl/bpi/doku.php?id=2013:challenge.

  5. 5.

    The random percentage p was drawn from a uniform distribution , repeating the experiment for its stochastic validity.

References

  1. Comuzzi, M.: Ant-colony optimisation for path recommendation in business process execution. J. Data Semantics 8(2), 113–128 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. de Leoni, M., Dees, M., Reulink, L.: Design and evaluation of a process-aware recommender system based on prescriptive analytics. In: 2020 2nd International Conference on Process Mining (ICPM) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weinzierl, S., Dunzer, S., Zilker, S., Matzner, M.: Prescriptive business process monitoring for recommending next best actions. In: Business Process Management Forum (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Metzger, A., Kley, T., Palm, A.: Triggering proactive business process adaptations via online reinforcement learning. In: Fahland, D., Ghidini, C., Becker, J., Dumas, M. (eds.) BPM 2020. LNCS, vol. 12168, pp. 273–290. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58666-9_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Fahrenkrog-Petersen, S., Tax, N., Teinemaa, I., Dumas, M., de Leoni, M., Maggi, F., Weidlich, M.: Fire now, fire later: alarm-based systems for prescriptive process monitoring. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 64, 02 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozorgi, Z.D., Teinemaa, I., Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Polyvyanyy, A.: Prescriptive process monitoring for cost-aware cycle time reduction. In: 2021 3rd International Conference on Process Mining (ICPM) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Padella, A., de Leoni, M., Dogan, O., Galanti, R.: Explainable process prescriptive analytics. In: 2022 4th International Conference on Process Mining (ICPM), pp. 16–23 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shapley, L.S.: A value for n-person games. RAND Corporation, no. 28 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cabanillas, C., Schönig, S., Sturm, C., Mendling, J.: Mining expressive and executable resource-aware imperative process models. In: Gulden, J., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Schmidt, R., Guerreiro, S., Guédria, W., Bera, P. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2018. LNBIP, vol. 318, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91704-7_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Havur, G., Cabanillas, C.: History-aware dynamic process fragmentation for risk-aware resource allocation. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Hepp, M., Lewis, D., Ardagna, C.A., Meersman, R. (eds.) OTM 2019. LNCS, vol. 11877, pp. 533–551. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao, W., Yang, L., Liu, H., Wu, R.: The optimization of resource allocation based on process mining. In: Huang, D.-S., Han, K. (eds.) ICIC 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9227, pp. 341–353. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22053-6_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, Z., van der Aalst, W., Lu, X., Duan, H.: Reinforcement learning based resource allocation in business process management. Data Knowl. Eng. 70(1), 127–145 (2011). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169023X1000114X

  13. Park, G., Song, M.: Prediction-based resource allocation using LSTM and minimum cost and maximum flow algorithm. In: International Conference on Process Mining (ICPM) 2019, pp. 121–128 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shoush, M., Dumas, M.: When to intervene? prescriptive process monitoring under uncertainty and resource constraints. In: Di Ciccio, C., Dijkman, R., del Río Ortega, A., Rinderle-Ma, S. (eds.) Business Process Management Forum, pp. 207–223 Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16171-1_13

  15. de Leoni, M.: Foundations of Process Enhancement, pp. 243–273. Springer, Cham (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Gay, G.: Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR 2005, pp. 154–161. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The PhD. scholarship of Mr. Padella is partly funded by IBM Italy, and by the BMCS Doctoral Program, University of Padua. This research is also supported by the Department of Mathematics, University of Padua, through the BIRD project “Data-driven Business Process Improvement” (code BIRD215924/21).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Padella .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Padella, A., de Leoni, M. (2023). Resource Allocation in Recommender Systems for Global KPI Improvement. In: Di Francescomarino, C., Burattin, A., Janiesch, C., Sadiq, S. (eds) Business Process Management Forum. BPM 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 490. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41623-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41623-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41622-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41623-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics