Skip to main content

Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma with IVC Thrombus, Nodal Involvement, and T4 Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrating Multidisciplinary Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Abstract

Locally advanced, nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma describes renal cell carcinoma involving tissues outside of the renal parenchyma including the peri- and intra-renal fat, neighboring organs, and regional (e.g., retroperitoneal) lymph nodes as well those tumors with vascular invasion into the renal vein and its branches, and the inferior vena cava, staged as cT3-4 N1 M0 disease. The cornerstone of the management of locally advanced renal cell carcinoma remains surgical extirpation. Due to the extent of locally advanced renal cell carcinoma, these operations may require technically complex maneuvers include en bloc excision of neighboring organs to obtain a complete resection with negative margins (R0). Complex multidisciplinary coordination is frequently required to optimize preparedness and patient outcomes. In this chapter, we review the preoperative evaluation and risk stratification for patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma including those with involvement of the IVC. We discuss technical considerations for the surgical management of this disease including IVC thrombectomy, lymphadenectomy, and considerations for resecting adjacent involved structures (cT4 disease), as well as review the existent data regarding the evolving role for neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy in this disease space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shuch B, Amin A, Armstrong AJ, et al. Understanding pathologic variants of renal cell carcinoma: distilling therapeutic opportunities from biologic complexity. Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gibbons RP, Monte JE, Correa RJ, Mason JT. Manifestations of renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 1976;8(3):201–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(76)90366-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saad AM, Kassis N, Isogai T, et al. Trends in outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the United States (2012-2017). Am J Cardiol. 2021;141:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garg T, Young AJ, Kost KA, et al. Burden of multiple chronic conditions among patients with urological cancer. J Urol. 2018;199(2):543–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Janzen NK, Kim HL, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Surveillance after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma and management of recurrent disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2003;30(4):843–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0094-0143(03)00056-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson RH, Hill JR, Babayev Y, et al. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma risk according to tumor size. J Urol. 2009;182(1):41–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Padala SA, Barsouk A, Thandra KC, et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. World J Oncol. 2020;11(3):79–87. https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Paner GP, Stadler WM, Hansel DE, Montironi R, Lin DW, Amin MB. Updates in the eighth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis staging classification for urologic cancers. Eur Urol. 2018;73(4):560–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93–9. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Terrone C, Cracco C, Porpiglia F, et al. Reassessing the current TNM lymph node staging for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2006;49(2):324–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Neves RJ, Zincke H. Surgical treatment of renal cancer with vena cava extension. Br J Urol. 1987;59(5):390–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1987.tb04832.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connor SD, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Oliva MR, Silverman SG. Incidental finding of renal masses at unenhanced CT: prevalence and analysis of features for guiding management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(1):139–45. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5920.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Radadia KD, Rivera-Núñez Z, Kim S, et al. Accuracy of clinical nodal staging and factors associated with receipt of lymph node dissection at the time of surgery for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(9):577.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gershman B, Moreira DM, Thompson RH, et al. Renal cell carcinoma with isolated lymph node involvement: long-term natural history and predictors of oncologic outcomes following surgical resection. Eur Urol. 2017;72(2):300–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blute ML, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Cheville JC, Zincke H. The Mayo Clinic experience with surgical management, complications and outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumour thrombus. BJU Int. 2004;94(1):33–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04897.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Babaian KN, Kim DY, Kenney PA, et al. Preoperative predictors of pathological lymph node metastasis in patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Urol. 2015;193(4):1101–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.096.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pouliot F, Shuch B, Larochelle JC, Pantuck A, Belldegrun AS. Contemporary management of renal tumors with venous tumor thrombus. J Urol. 2010;184(3):833–41.; quiz 1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lawindy SM, Kurian T, Kim T, et al. Important surgical considerations in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumour thrombus. BJU Int. 2012;110(7):926–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11174.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo HF, Song Y, Na YQ. Value of abdominal ultrasound scan, CT and MRI for diagnosing inferior vena cava tumour thrombus in renal cell carcinoma. Chin Med J. 2009;122(19):2299–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Quencer KB, Friedman T, Sheth R, Oklu R. Tumor thrombus: incidence, imaging, prognosis and treatment. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7(3):S165–77. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.09.16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Adams LC, Ralla B, Bender YY, et al. Renal cell carcinoma with venous extension: prediction of inferior vena cava wall invasion by MRI. Cancer Imaging. 2018;18(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-018-0150-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li L, Shiradkar R, Leo P, et al. A novel imaging based Nomogram for predicting post-surgical biochemical recurrence and adverse pathology of prostate cancer from pre-operative bi-parametric MRI. EBioMedicine. 2021;63:103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Patel HV, Sterling JA, Srivastava A, et al. The impact of venous thromboembolism on mortality and morbidity during nephrectomy for renal mass. Urology. 2022;168:122–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.05.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Blute ML, Boorjian SA, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Frank I, Karnes RJ. Results of inferior vena caval interruption by greenfield filter, ligation or resection during radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy. J Urol. 2007;178(2):440–5; discussion 444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Calderone CE, Tuck BC, Gray SH, Porter KK, Rais-Bahrami S. The role of transesophageal echocardiography in the management of renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus. Echocardiography. 2018;35(12):2047–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.14187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Seiler CM, Deckert A, Diener MK, et al. Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227). Ann Surg. 2009;249(6):913–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77c92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vigneswaran Y, Poli E, Talamonti MS, Haggerty SP, Linn JG, Ujiki MB. Rectus abdominis atrophy after ventral abdominal incisions: midline versus chevron. Hernia. 2017;21(4):619–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1593-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Clayman RV, Gonzalez R, Fraley EE. Renal cancer invading the inferior vena cava: clinical review and anatomical approach. J Urol. 1980;123(2):157–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55832-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chang SB, Palavecino M, Wray CJ, Kishi Y, Pisters PW, Vauthey JN. Modified Makuuchi incision for foregut procedures. Arch Surg. 2010;145(3):281–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Parra J, Drouin SJ, Hupertan V, Comperat E, Bitker MO, Rouprêt M. Oncological outcomes in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy and vena cava thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma with venous extension: a single-centre experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(5):422–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2011.01.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ciancio G, Gonzalez J, Shirodkar SP, Angulo JC, Soloway MS. Liver transplantation techniques for the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava: step-by-step description. Eur Urol. 2011;59(3):401–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.07.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Psutka SP, Leibovich BC. Management of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus in locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. Ther Adv Urol. 2015;7(4):216–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287215576443.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ciancio G, Manoharan M, Katkoori D, De Los SR, Soloway MS. Long-term survival in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava thrombectomy: single-center experience. Eur Urol. 2010;57(4):667–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ciancio G, Vaidya A, Savoie M, Soloway M. Management of renal cell carcinoma with level III thrombus in the inferior vena cava. J Urol. 2002;168(4):1374–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000023441.00587.02.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hyams ES, Pierorazio PM, Shah A, Lum YW, Black J, Allaf ME. Graft reconstruction of inferior vena cava for renal cell carcinoma stage pT3b or greater. Urology. 2011;78(4):838–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.06.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Joshi S, Ayyathurai R, Satyanarayana R, Ciancio G. Important surgical considerations in the management of renal cell carcinoma (rcc) with inferior vena cava (ivc) tumour thrombus. BJU Int. 2012;110(7):E327–8; author reply E328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10975_1.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cooper WA, Duarte IG, Thourani VH, et al. Hypothermic circulatory arrest causes multisystem vascular endothelial dysfunction and apoptosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(3):696–702; discussion 703. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01524-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lau C, O’Malley P, Gaudino M, Scherr DS, Girardi LN. Resection of intraabdominal tumors with cavoatrial extension using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(3):836–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rose KM, Navaratnam AK, Faraj KS, et al. Comparison of open and robot assisted radical nephrectomy with level I and II inferior vena cava tumor thrombus: The Mayo Clinic experience. Urology. 2020;136:152–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gill IS, Metcalfe C, Abreu A, et al. Robotic level III inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy: initial series. J Urol. 2015;194(4):929–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Garg H, Psutka SP, Hakimi AA, et al. A decade of robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol. 2022;208(3):542–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Woodruff DY, Van Veldhuizen P, Muehlebach G, Johnson P, Williamson T, Holzbeierlein JM. The perioperative management of an inferior vena caval tumor thrombus in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2013;31(5):517–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Morita Y, Ayabe K, Nurok M, Young J. Perioperative anesthetic management for renal cell carcinoma with vena caval thrombus extending into the right atrium: case series. J Clin Anesth. 2017;36:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.09.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wikkelsø A, Wetterslev J, Møller AM, Afshari A. Thromboelastography (TEG) or rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to monitor haemostatic treatment in bleeding patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(4):519–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Davenport R, Manson J, De Ath H, et al. Functional definition and characterization of acute traumatic coagulopathy. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(12):2652–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182281af5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Reynolds BR, Forsythe RM, Harbrecht BG, et al. Hypothermia in massive transfusion: have we been paying enough attention to it? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(2):486–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Patil V, Shetmahajan M. Massive transfusion and massive transfusion protocol. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(5):590–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.144662.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Fukazawa K, Gologorsky E, Naguit K, et al. Invasive renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus: cardiac anesthesia in liver transplant settings. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;28(3):640–6. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2013.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Staehler M, Rohrmann K, Haseke N, Stief CG, Siebels M. Targeted agents for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Curr Drug Targets. 2005;6(7):835–46. https://doi.org/10.2174/138945005774574498.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Margulis V, Sánchez-Ortiz RF, Tamboli P, Cohen DD, Swanson DA, Wood CG. Renal cell carcinoma clinically involving adjacent organs: experience with aggressive surgical management. Cancer. 2007;109(10):2025–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Prunty M, Bukavina L, Psutka SP. Metastasectomy in kidney cancer: current indications and treatment approaches. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2021;15(4):266–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Joyce DD, Psutka SP, Groeschl RT, et al. Complications and outcomes associated with surgical management of renal cell carcinoma involving the liver: a matched cohort study. Urology. 2017;99:155–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ruys AT, Tanis PJ, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Surgical treatment of renal cell cancer liver metastases: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(7):1932–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1526-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Malleo G, Salvia R, Maggino L, et al. Long-term outcomes after surgical resection of pancreatic metastases from renal clear-cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(6):3100–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09649-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Lane BR, Tiong HY, Campbell SC, et al. Management of the adrenal gland during partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2009;181(6):2430–6; discussion 2436–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kutikov A, Piotrowski ZJ, Canter DJ, et al. Routine adrenalectomy is unnecessary during surgery for large and/or upper pole renal tumors when the adrenal gland is radiographically normal. J Urol. 2011;185(4):1198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.090.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Jasim S, Alahdab F, Ahmed AT, et al. Mortality in adults with hypopituitarism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2017;56(1):33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-016-1159-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Tomlinson JW, Holden N, Hills RK, et al. Association between premature mortality and hypopituitarism. West Midlands Prospective Hypopituitary Study Group. Lancet. 2001;357(9254):425–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04006-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Nason GJ, Aslam A, Giri SK. Predictive ability of preoperative CT scan in determining whether the adrenal gland is spared at radical nephrectomy. Curr Urol. 2016;9(3):143–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442869.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Kletscher BA, Qian J, Bostwick DG, Blute ML, Zincke H. Prospective analysis of the incidence of ipsilateral adrenal metastasis in localized renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1996;155(6):1844–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Leibovitch I, Raviv G, Mor Y, Nativ O, Goldwasser B. Reconsidering the necessity of ipsilateral adrenalectomy during radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 1995;46(3):316–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80213-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gill IS, McClennan BL, Kerbl K, Carbone JM, Wick M, Clayman RV. Adrenal involvement from renal cell carcinoma: predictive value of computerized tomography. J Urol. 1994;152(4):1082–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32508-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Weight CJ, Kim SP, Lohse CM, et al. Routine adrenalectomy in patients with locally advanced renal cell cancer does not offer oncologic benefit and places a significant portion of patients at risk for an asynchronous metastasis in a solitary adrenal gland. Eur Urol. 2011;60(3):458–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.04.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. González J, Gaynor JJ, Ciancio G. Renal cell carcinoma with or without tumor thrombus invading the liver, pancreas and duodenum. Cancer. 2021;13(7):1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071695.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Brozzetti S, Bini S, De Lio N, Lombardo C, Boggi U. Surgical-only treatment of pancreatic and extra-pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma - quality of life and survival analysis. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00757-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Ciancio G, Vaidya A, Shirodkar S, Manoharan M, Hakky T, Soloway M. En bloc mobilization of the pancreas and spleen to facilitate resection of large tumors, primarily renal and adrenal, in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen: techniques derived from multivisceral transplantation. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1106–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Srivastava A, Rivera-Núñez Z, Kim S, et al. Impact of pathologic lymph node-positive renal cell carcinoma on survival in patients without metastasis: evidence in support of expanding the definition of stage IV kidney cancer. Cancer. 2020;126(13):2991–3001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Chen ZF, Wu P, Zheng SB, Zhang P, Tan WL, Mao XM. Patient outcome and prognostic factors of renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage T(1-3)N(1-2)M(0): a single-institution analysis. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2011;31(5):749–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Delacroix SE, Chapin BF, Chen JJ, et al. Can a durable disease-free survival be achieved with surgical resection in patients with pathological node positive renal cell carcinoma? J Urol. 2011;186(4):1236–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Gershman B, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, et al. Radical nephrectomy with or without lymph node dissection for high risk nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis. J Urol. 2018;199(5):1143–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Sun M, Trinh QD, Bianchi M, et al. Extent of lymphadenectomy does not improve the survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma and nodal metastases: biases associated with the handling of missing data. BJU Int. 2014;113(1):36–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11693.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Trinh QD, Schmitges J, Bianchi M, et al. Node-positive renal cell carcinoma in the absence of distant metastases: predictors of cancer-specific mortality in a population-based cohort. BJU Int. 2012;110(2):E21–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10701.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhang ZL, Li YH, Xiong YH, et al. Oncological outcome of surgical treatment in 336 patients with renal cell carcinoma. Chin J Cancer. 2010;29(12):995–9. https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.010.10383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Campi R, Sessa F, Di Maida F, et al. Templates of lymph node dissection for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature. Front Surg. 2018;5:76. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2018.00076.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Vasselli JR, Yang JC, Linehan WM, White DE, Rosenberg SA, Walther MM. Lack of retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy predicts survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2001;166(1):68–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Kuusk T, De Jong J, Grivas N, Horenblas S, Bex A. Long-term survival after resection of sentinel node metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2017;103:e5–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.02.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W. The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2017;197(2S):S111–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Yu KJ, Keskin SK, Meissner MA, et al. Renal cell carcinoma and pathologic nodal disease: implications for American Joint Committee on Cancer staging. Cancer. 2018;124(20):4023–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Nini A, Larcher A, Cianflone F, et al. The effect of anatomical location of lymph node metastases on cancer specific survival in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Front Surg. 2018;5:26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2018.00026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Chrouser KFF, Goldenberg M. Optimizing outcomes in urologic surgery: intraoperative considerations. Linthicum: American Urological Association; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Joslyn SA, Konety BR. Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology. 2006;68(1):121–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Kokorovic A, Breau RH, Kapoor A, et al. Lymph node dissection during radical nephrectomy: a Canadian multi-institutional analysis. Urol Oncol. 2021;39(6):371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Pantuck AJ, Zisman A, Dorey F, et al. Renal cell carcinoma with retroperitoneal lymph nodes: role of lymph node dissection. J Urol. 2003;169(6):2076–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000066130.27119.1c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Blom JH, van Poppel H, Maréchal JM, et al. Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph-node dissection: final results of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized phase 3 trial 30881. Eur Urol. 2009;55(1):28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.09.052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Jairath A, Singh A, Ganpule A, Mishra S, Sabnis R, Desai M. Management protocol for chylous ascites after laparoscopic nephrectomy. Urology. 2015;86(3):521–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Nadolski GJ, Chauhan NR, Itkin M. Lymphangiography and lymphatic embolization for the treatment of refractory chylous ascites. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(3):415–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1856-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Giuliani L, Martorana G, Giberti C, Pescatore D, Magnani G. Results of radical nephrectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1983;130(4):664–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)51391-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Blute ML, Leibovich BC, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H. A protocol for performing extended lymph node dissection using primary tumor pathological features for patients treated with radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2004;172(2):465–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000129815.91927.85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Crispen PL, Breau RH, Allmer C, et al. Lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephrectomy for high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma: indications and recommendations for surgical templates. Eur Urol. 2011;59(1):18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Capitanio U, Deho F, Dell’Oglio P, et al. Lymphadenopathies in patients with renal cell carcinoma: clinical and pathological predictors of pathologically confirmed lymph node invasion. World J Urol. 2016;34(8):1139–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1747-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Canfield SE, Kamat AM, Sánchez-Ortiz RF, Detry M, Swanson DA, Wood CG. Renal cell carcinoma with nodal metastases in the absence of distant metastatic disease (clinical stage TxN1-2M0): the impact of aggressive surgical resection on patient outcome. J Urol. 2006;175(3):864–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00334-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Tilki D, Chandrasekar T, Capitanio U, et al. Impact of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy on oncological outcomes: results from the International Renal Cell Carcinoma-Venous Thrombus Consortium (IRCC-VTC). Urol Oncol. 2018;36(2):79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Peters PC, Brown GL. The role of lymphadenectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am. 1980;7(3):705–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Capitanio U, Matloob R, Suardi N, et al. The extent of lymphadenectomy does affect cancer specific survival in pathologically confirmed T4 renal cell carcinoma. Urologia. 2012;79(2):109–15. https://doi.org/10.5301/RU.2012.9255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Schafhauser W, Ebert A, Brod J, Petsch S, Schrott KM. Lymph node involvement in renal cell carcinoma and survival chance by systematic lymphadenectomy. Anticancer Res. 1999;19(2C):1573–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Giberti C, Oneto F, Martorana G, Rovida S, Carmignani G. Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: long-term results and prognostic factors on a series of 328 cases. Eur Urol. 1997;31(1):40–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000474416.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Whitson JM, Harris CR, Reese AC, Meng MV. Lymphadenectomy improves survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma and nodal metastases. J Urol. 2011;185(5):1615–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Feuerstein MA, Kent M, Bazzi WM, Bernstein M, Russo P. Analysis of lymph node dissection in patients with ≥7-cm renal tumors. World J Urol. 2014;32(6):1531–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1233-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Farber NJ, Rivera-Núñez Z, Kim S, et al. Trends and outcomes of lymphadenectomy for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score-weighted analysis of the National Cancer Database. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(1):26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.10.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Bhindi B, Wallis CJD, Boorjian SA, et al. The role of lymph node dissection in the management of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2018;121(5):684–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Bedke J, Albiges L, Capitanio U, et al. The 2021 updated European Association of Urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapies for treatment-naive metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma are standard of care. Eur Urol. 2021;80(4):393–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Campbell SC, Uzzo RG, Karam JA, Chang SS, Clark PE, Souter L. Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA guideline: Part II. J Urol. 2021;206(2):209–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Campbell SC, Clark PE, Chang SS, Karam JA, Souter L, Uzzo RG. Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA guideline: part I. J Urol. 2021;206(2):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2019 update. Eur Urol. 2019;75(5):799–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Lue K, Russell CM, Fisher J, et al. Predictors of postoperative complications in patients who undergo radical nephrectomy and IVC thrombectomy: a large contemporary tertiary center analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;14(1):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2015.09.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA, et al. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(6):392–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Jang RW, Caraiscos VB, Swami N, et al. Simple prognostic model for patients with advanced cancer based on performance status. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(5):e335–41. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2014.001457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Simmons CPL, McMillan DC, McWilliams K, et al. Prognostic tools in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2017;53(5):962–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Xu Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Kang J, Liu X. Prognostic value of performance status in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5375-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Bergerot CD, Philip EJ, Bergerot PG, et al. Discrepancies between genitourinary cancer patients’ and clinicians’ characterization of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Cancer. 2021;127(3):354–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland YM, Morley JE, Vellas B. Frailty: toward a clinical definition. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008;9(2):71–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2007.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Hamaker ME, Jonker JM, de Rooij SE, Vos AG, Smorenburg CH, van Munster BC. Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(10):e437–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70259-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Guerard EJ, Deal AM, Chang Y, et al. Frailty index developed from a cancer-specific geriatric assessment and the association with mortality among older adults with cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2017;15(7):894–902. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2017.0122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Mottet N, Ribal MJ, Boyle H, et al. Management of bladder cancer in older patients: position paper of a SIOG Task Force. J Geriatr Oncol. 2020;11(7):1043–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2020.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. NCC. N. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: older adult oncology Version 1.2020.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Kanesvaran R, Le Saux O, Motzer R, et al. Elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: position paper from the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(6):e317–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30125-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Dubianski R, Wildes TM, Wildiers H. SIOG guidelines- essential for good clinical practice in geriatric oncology. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019;10(2):196–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2018.12.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Psutka SP, Boorjian SA, Moynagh MR, et al. Decreased skeletal muscle mass is associated with an increased risk of mortality after radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell cancer. J Urol. 2016;195(2):270–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Fukushima H, Nakanishi Y, Kataoka M, Tobisu K, Koga F. Prognostic significance of sarcopenia in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2016;195(1):26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Abel EJ, Thompson RH, Margulis V, et al. Perioperative outcomes following surgical resection of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus extending above the hepatic veins: a contemporary multicenter experience. Eur Urol. 2014;66(3):584–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Michaelson MD, Stadler WM. Predictive markers in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Semin Oncol. 2013;40(4):459–64. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.05.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Ramsey S, Lamb GW, Aitchison M, McMillan DC. Prospective study of the relationship between the systemic inflammatory response, prognostic scoring systems and relapse-free and cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for renal cancer. BJU Int. 2008;101(8):959–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07363.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, et al. Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(34):5794–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Ghali F, Patel SH, Derweesh IH. Current status of immunotherapy for localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Oncol. 2019;2019:7309205. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7309205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Bindayi A, Hamilton ZA, McDonald ML, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2018;36(1):31–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.07.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Thomas AA, Rini BI, Lane BR, et al. Response of the primary tumor to neoadjuvant sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2009;181(2):518–23; discussion 523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Hellenthal NJ, Underwood W, Penetrante R, et al. Prospective clinical trial of preoperative sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2010;184(3):859–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Cowey CL, Amin C, Pruthi RS, et al. Neoadjuvant clinical trial with sorafenib for patients with stage II or higher renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(9):1502–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.7759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Karam JA, Devine CE, Urbauer DL, et al. Phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant axitinib in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2014;66(5):874–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Lane BR, Derweesh IH, Kim HL, et al. Presurgical sunitinib reduces tumor size and may facilitate partial nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2015;33(3):112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.11.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Martini A, Fallara G, Pellegrino F, et al. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol. 2021;39(5):1369–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03550-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J, et al. Avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(12):1103–15. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1816047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Janzen NK, Kim HL, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Surveillance after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma and management of recurrent disease. Urol Clin N Am. 2003;30(4):843–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0094-0143(03)00056-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Patel HD, Puligandla M, Shuch BM, et al. The future of perioperative therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma: how can we PROSPER? Future Oncol. 2019;15(15):1683–95. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2018-0951.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Ravaud A, Motzer RJ, Pandha HS, et al. Adjuvant sunitinib in high-risk renal-cell carcinoma after nephrectomy. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(23):2246–54. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Msaouel P, Grivas P, Zhang T. Adjuvant systemic therapies for patients with renal cell carcinoma: choosing treatment based on patient-level characteristics. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2021.09.003.

  139. Bergerot CD, Battle D, Philip EJ, et al. Fear of cancer recurrence in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020;16(11):e1264–71. https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.20.00105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Patard JJ, Kim HL, Lam JS, et al. Use of the University of California Los Angeles integrated staging system to predict survival in renal cell carcinoma: an international multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(16):3316–22. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.09.104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al. Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. Cancer. 2003;97(7):1663–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Rodriguez-Fernandez IA, Rodriguez-Romo L, Hernandez-Barajas D, et al. Adjuvant radiation therapy after radical nephrectomy in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019;2(4):448–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2018.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Pizzocaro G, Piva L, Fronzo GD, et al. Adjuvant medroxyprogesterone acetate to radical nephrectomy in renal cancer: 5-year results of a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 1987;138(6):1379–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43647-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Clark JI, Atkins MB, Urba WJ, et al. Adjuvant high-dose bolus interleukin-2 for patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma: a cytokine working group randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(16):3133–40. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.02.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Messing EM, Manola J, Wilding G, et al. Phase III study of interferon alfa-NL as adjuvant treatment for resectable renal cell carcinoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/intergroup trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(7):1214–22. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.02.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Passalacqua R, Caminiti C, Buti S, et al. Adjuvant low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in operable renal cell carcinoma (RCC): a phase III, randomized, multicentre trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC). J Immunother. 2014;37(9):440–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0000000000000055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Atzpodien J, Kirchner H, Jonas U, et al. Interleukin-2- and interferon alfa-2a-based immunochemotherapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a prospectively randomized trial of the German Cooperative Renal Carcinoma Chemoimmunotherapy Group (DGCIN). J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(7):1188–94. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.06.155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Aitchison M, Bray CA, Van Poppel H, et al. Adjuvant 5-flurouracil, alpha-interferon and interleukin-2 versus observation in patients at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: results of a phase III randomised European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (Genito-Urinary Cancers Group)/National Cancer Research Institute trial. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(1):70–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Galligioni E, Quaia M, Merlo A, et al. Adjuvant immunotherapy treatment of renal carcinoma patients with autologous tumor cells and Bacillus Calmette-Guèrin: five-year results of a prospective randomized study. Cancer. 1996;77(12):2560–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19960615)77:12<2560::Aid-cncr20>3.0.Co;2-p.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Wood C, Srivastava P, Bukowski R, et al. An adjuvant autologous therapeutic vaccine (HSPPC-96; vitespen) versus observation alone for patients at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9633):145–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60697-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Jocham D, Richter A, Hoffmann L, et al. Adjuvant autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal-cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9409):594–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15590-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Fishman M, Antonia S. Specific antitumour vaccine for renal cancer. Lancet. 2004;363(9409):583–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15625-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Chamie K, Donin NM, Klopfer P, et al. Adjuvant weekly girentuximab following nephrectomy for high-risk renal cell carcinoma: the ARISER randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(7):913–20. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. NCCN Guidelines Kidney Cancer. Kidney Cancer. NCCN Guidelines. 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  155. Powles T, Albiges L, Bex A, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline update on the use of immunotherapy in early stage and advanced renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.014.

  156. Chandrasekar T, Klaassen Z, Goldberg H, Sayyid RK, Kulkarni GS, Fleshner NE. High competing risks minimize real-world utility of adjuvant targeted therapy in renal cell carcinoma: a population-based analysis. Oncotarget. 2018;9(24):16731–43. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24675.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. Motzer RJ, Ravaud A, Patard JJ, et al. Adjuvant sunitinib for high-risk renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: subgroup analyses and updated overall survival results. Eur Urol. 2018;73(1):62–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.09.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Haas NB, Manola J, Uzzo RG, et al. Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10032):2008–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00559-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Haas NB, Manola J, Dutcher JP, et al. Adjuvant treatment for high-risk clear cell renal cancer: updated results of a high-risk subset of the ASSURE randomized trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(9):1249–52. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0076.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Gyawali B, Ando Y. Adjuvant sunitinib for high-risk-resected renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of ASSURE and S-TRAC trials. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(4):898–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw667.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Motzer RJ, Haas NB, Donskov F, et al. Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant pazopanib versus placebo after nephrectomy in patients with localized or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(35):3916–23. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.73.5324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. Sternberg CN, Donskov F, Haas NB, et al. Pazopanib exposure relationship with clinical efficacy and safety in the adjuvant treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(13):3005–13. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2652.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Gross-Goupil M, Kwon TG, Eto M, et al. Axitinib versus placebo as an adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase III, randomized ATLAS trial. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(12):2371–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy454.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  164. Eisen T, Frangou E, Oza B, et al. Adjuvant sorafenib for renal cell carcinoma at intermediate or high risk of relapse: results from the SORCE Randomized Phase III Intergroup Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(34):4064–75. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. Laukhtina E, Quhal F, Mori K, et al. Adjuvant therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.07.022.

  166. Choueiri TK, Tomczak P, Park SH, et al. Adjuvant pembrolizumab after nephrectomy in renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(8):683–94. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2106391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Synold TW, Plets M, Tangen CM, et al. Everolimus exposure as a predictor of toxicity in renal cell cancer patients in the adjuvant setting: results of a pharmacokinetic analysis for SWOG S0931 (EVEREST), a phase III study (NCT01120249). Kidney Cancer. 2019;3(2):111–8. https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-180049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Ponsky and Dr. Uzzo for providing radiographic and intraoperative imaging.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah P. Psutka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bukavina, L., Braun, A., Higgens, M., Prunty, M., Psutka, S.P. (2023). Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma with IVC Thrombus, Nodal Involvement, and T4 Disease. In: McKay, R.R., Singer, E.A. (eds) Integrating Multidisciplinary Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40901-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40901-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40900-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40901-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics