Skip to main content

Writing Together: Collaborative Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Scholarly Writing

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Education ((SPTE))

  • 297 Accesses

Abstract

Finding a suitable writing partner and working with a successful writing team can be one of the most satisfying ways of generating a publishable manuscript. Conversely, when collaborative writing arrangements and agreements falter or fail, they can be exceptionally troublesome. This chapter is designed to help authors maximize the benefits of collaborative writing and minimize the mistakes. Writing relationships built by academic co-authors are complex and should not be entered into lightly. Rather, each project undertaken requires thoughtful consideration of the unique contribution that every contributor will make. A common mistake of beginners is to invite someone affable, equally inexperienced, and like-minded to be a co-author in hopes that it will expedite matters, make writing more pleasurable, and offer uncritical acceptance. This approach runs contrary to research and practice on collaborative writing. Evidently, collaboration is more often successful when inexperienced writers partner with more experienced authors, co-contributors have unique perspectives/complementary strengths, and team members critically evaluate one another’s work. Furthermore, while a “divide and conquer” strategy with writing has intuitive appeal, assembling various pieces is insufficient. The finished product still needs to have a consistent tone and voice, and this can require an additional investment of time during editing. Even more difficult are situations when co-authors fail to meet deadlines, produce something unusable, or expect more credit than deserved. Throughout this chapter, we argue that collaborative writing is both an interprofessional and an interpersonal relationship. As such, it merits careful selection of co-authors, thoughtful planning, ongoing communication, and skillful editing of the final, published version of a manuscript.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, Z. (2022, October 12). Student mental health is in crisis. Campuses are rethinking their approach. Monitor, 53(7) (apa.org).

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Professors (AAUP). (2023). Background facts on contingent faculty positions.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Council on Education. (2023). American college presidents study. American College President Study (acenet.edu).

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (APA). (2022, May). Publication practices and responsible authorship (apa.org).

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebee, D. C. (2017, September). The soft skills college students need to succeed now and in the future. Psychology Student Network, (apa.org).

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. B., Cooper, C. R., Carillo, E. C., & Cleaves, W. T. (2021). The St. Martin’s guide to writing (13th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badenhorst, C., Mcleod, H., Vaandering, D., Li, X., Joy, R., Penney, S. C., Pickett, S., & Hesson, J. (2016). The journey between there and here: Stories of a faculty writing group. Canadian Journal of Education, 39, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baggs, J. G. (2008). Editorial: Issues and rules for authors concerning authorship versus acknowledgements, dual publication, self-plagiarism, and salami publishing. Research in Nursing and Health, 31(4), 295–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, M. W., & Ferreira-Lopes, L. (2021). Emerging trends in telecollaboration and virtual exchange: A bibliometric study. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1907314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham-Risher, R., & Armstrong, J. (2019). Faculty writing studio: A place to write. In N. Simons & A. Singh (Eds.), Critical collaborative communities: Academic writing partnerships, groups, and retreats (pp. 66–77). Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control. (2005). Authorship policy (cdc.gov).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R. M. (1990). Coping with the problems of collaborative writing. Writing Across the Curriculum, 11, 90–108. chisholm.pdf (colostate.edu).

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2021). COPE flowcharts and infographics—Ghost, guest, or gift authorship in a submitted manuscript—English. Ghost, guest or gift authorship suspected in paper (publicationethics.org).

    Google Scholar 

  • Compose.ly (2020, March 30). The top 7 online collaborative writing tools. The Top 7 Online Collaborative Writing Tools|Compose.ly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva, J. A. T., & Dobranszki, J. (2016). Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: Ethical challenges, ghost and guest/gift authorship, and the cultural/disciplinary perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Caux, B. C., Pretorius, L., & Macaulay, L. (Eds.). (2022). Research and teaching in a pandemic world: The challenges of establishing academic identities during times of crisis. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diversi, M., Gale, K., Moreira, C., & Wyatt, J. (2020). Writing with: Collaborative writing as hope and resistance. International Review of Qualitative Research, 14(2), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940844720978761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Editors of Nature. (2015). Why interdisciplinary research matters. Nature, 525, 305. https://doi.org/10.1038/525305a

  • Eise, J. (2019, January 28). Herding experts and polishing text. Nature Careers. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07814-y

  • Encyclopedia.com. (2018, May 9). Folkore and mythology. Damocles, sword of. Sword Of Damocles|Encyclopedia.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errecaborde, K. M., Macy, K. W., Pekol, A., Perez, S., O’Brien, M. K., Allen, I., Contadini, F., Lee, J. Y., Mumford, E., Bender, J. B., & Pelican, K. (2019). Factors that enable effective one health collaborations: A scoping review of the literature. PLoS ONE, 14(12), e0224660. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidelity Investments and The Chronicle of Higher Education. (2021, February 25). Fidelity investments and the chronicle of higher education study: More than half of college and university faculty consider leaving teaching, citing burnout caused by pandemic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadlin, H., & Jessar, K. (2001). Preempting discord: Prenuptial agreements for scientists. ORI: The Office of Research Integrity. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Preempting Discord: Prenuptial Agreements for Scientists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, K., Speedy, J., & Wyatt, J. (2014). Collaborative writing as inquiry. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germano, W. (2021). On revision: The only writing that counts. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Ferri, J., Gonzalez-Alcaide, G., & Lopis-Goig, R. (2019). Measuring dissatisfaction with co-authorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers’ perception. Journal of Informetrics, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.100980

  • Greenbaum, A. (2002). Emancipatory movements in composition: The rhetoric of possibility. SUNY Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haghani, M., Abbasi, A., Zwack, C. C., Shahhoseini, Z., & Haslam, N. (2022). Trends of research productivity across author gender and research fields: A multidisciplinary and multi-country observational study. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, M., & Matthews, K. E. (2017). Learning together through international collaborative writing groups. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 5(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.1.2

  • Henriksen, D. (2016). The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013). Scientometrics, 107, 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1849-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holgate, S. A. (2012, July 20). How to collaborate. Science Careers. AAAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyer, M. C., Landau, J. L., & Workman, J. L. (2021). Recovering from burnout and budget cuts by cultivating writing communities. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 12, 149–168. openjournal.lib.miamioh.edu/index.php/jctl/article/download/213/115/ (Valdosta State)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalongo, M. R. (2002). Writing for publication: A practical guide for educators. Christopher-Gordon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. (2017). Write no matter what: Advice for academics. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (2011, September). Quoted in D. W. Burr. Is university parking a common grievance? Parking Today | Articles—Is University Parking a Common Grievance? (parkingtodaymedia.com).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohrt, B. A., Upadhaya, N., Luitel, N. P., Maharjan, S. M., Kaiser, B. N., MacFarlane, E. K., & Khan, N. (2014). Authorship in global mental health research: Recommendations for collaborative approaches to writing and publishing. Levy Library Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, L. (2023, February 15). How to write collaboratively. Write well with others: A guide to collaborative writing | Grammarly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, C. K. C., Hoang, C. H., Lau, R. W. K., de Caux, B. C., Chen, Y., Tan, O. O., et al. (2017). Experiential learning in doctoral training programmes: Fostering personal epistemology through collaboration. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1482863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, L. (2021). Collaborative writing: Strategies and activities for writing productively together. Perspectives on Medical Education, 10, 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00668-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. R. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. International Journal of Business Communication, 41(1), 66–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943603259363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallapaty, S. (2018, January 30). Paper authorship goes hyper. Nature Porfolio. Paper authorship goes hyper | News | Nature Index

    Google Scholar 

  • Manny, K., & Levitas, J. (2023). Academic integrity policies. Academic Integrity | Policy & Examples | Study.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, B. (2022, September 12). Top 16 essential soft skills for the future of work. Top 16 essential soft skills for the future of work (forbes.com).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, K. E., Marquis, B., & Healey, M. (2016). International collaborative writing groups as communities of practice. In J. McDonald, & A. Cater-Steel (Eds.), Implementing communities of practice in higher education (pp. 597–617). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2866-3_26

  • McMurtrie, B. (2020, November 5). The pandemic is dragging on. professors are burning out. Overwhelmed and undersupported, instructors see no end in sight. The Chronicle of Higher Education. mi-ace_mentoring_mondays_12.14.20.pdf (gvsu.edu).

    Google Scholar 

  • McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publications. PNAS Newsletter, 115(11), 2558–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nairn, K., Cameron, J., Anakin, M., Juntrasook, A., Wass, R., Sligo, J. et al. (2014). Negotiating the challenge of collaborative writing: Learning from one writing group’s mutiny 596–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.973383

  • Nancarrow, S. A., Booth, A., Ariss, S., Smith, T., Enderby, P., & Roots, A. (2013). Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Human Resources for Health, 11(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2018). Science and Engineering Indicators 2018. S&E Indicators 2018 | NSF—National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature Portfolio. (2023). Authorship. Nature Porfolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, V., Duffy, K., McCallum, J., & Price, L. (2014). Getting published: Reflections of a collaborative writing group. Nurse Education Today, 34(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.03.019

  • Nevin, A. I., Thousand, J. S., & Villa, R. A. (2011). Working with co-authors. In T. Rocco & T. Hatcher (Eds.), Teaching and writing for scholarly publication: A guide for faculty & graduate students (pp. 272–329). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K., Steadman-Jones, R., & Vasudevan, L. (2023). Collaborative research in theory and practice: The poetics of letting go. Bristol University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish, A. J., Boyack, K. W. & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research. PLoS One, e0189742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189742

  • Perkel, J. M. (2020). Synchronized editing: The future of collaborative writing. Nature, 580, 154–155. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00916-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pololi, L., & Knight, S. (2005). Mentoring faculty in academic medicine: A new paradigm? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(9), 866–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.05007.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, L., Williams, C. E., Hausfeld, M. M., Banks, G., & Davis, B. C. (2020). Authorship policies at US doctoral universities: A review and recommendations for future policies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 3393–3413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00273-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, D. (2019). Conclusion: Protecting and promoting higher education’s greatest resource. In A. G. Welch, J. H. Bolin & D. Reardon (Eds.). Mid-career faculty: Trends, barriers, and possibilities (pp. 217–221). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004408180_012

  • Remein, C. D., Childs, E., Beard, J., Demers, L. B., Benjamin, E. J., & Wingerter, S. L. (2022). Getting started: A pilot introductory narrative writing session for interprofessional faculty in academic health sciences. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 13, 265–274. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S350246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, L. C., Rapini, M. S., Silva, L. A., & Albuquerque, E. M. (2018). Growth patterns of the network of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics, 114, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2573-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robles, M. M. (2012). Executive perceptions of the top 10 soft skills needed in today’s workplace. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569912460400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodas, E. L., Columbo, L., Calle, M. D., & Cordero, G. (2021). Looking at faculty writing groups from within: Some insights for their sustainability and future implementations. International Journal for Academic Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1976189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a big five in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405277134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. P. (2011). Silence is not golden: Making collaborations work. The Office of Research Integrity. Silence is not Golden: Making Collaborations Work | ORI—The Office of Research Integrity (hhs.gov).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott III, R. H. (2022, November 16). Ensuring ethics and integrity in co-authorship. Ensuring Ethics and Integrity in Co-Authorship | AACSB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., Hande, K., & Kennedy, B. B. (2020). Mentoring nursing faculty: An inclusive scholarship support group. Nurse Educator, 45(4), 185–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer Nature. (2019). https://files.springernature.com/getResource/Collaboration%20in%20Research%20report.pdf

  • Strawser, M. G. (2019). Maintaining an active scholarly agenda and creating a culture of teaching and learning scholarship. Journal of Faculty Development, 33(3), 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tusting, K., McCulloch, S., Bhatt, I., Hamilton, M., & Barton, D. (2019). Academics writing: The dynamics of knowledge creation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429197994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Nebraska, Office of Graduate Studies. (2023). Best practices for collaborating on research. Graduate Connections. Best Practices for Collaborating on Research | Graduate Connections | Nebraska (unl.edu).

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Virginia (2023). Online ethics center for engineering and science. Topics: Authorship | Online Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbilt Center for Teaching (2023). Collaborative writing. Collaborative Writing | Center for Teaching | Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Growth of international collaboration in science: Revisiting six specialties. Scientometrics, 110, 1633–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2230-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolston, C. (2002, April 1). When a mentor becomes a thief. Chronicle of Higher Education, When a Mentor Becomes a Thief (chronicle.com).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, P., Yangwei, X., Zequan, X., & Li, Y. (2022, in press). Exploring librarians' intentions to collaborate in research: A model integrating the theory of planned behavior and social exchange theory. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221104259

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Renck Jalongo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Applications of Technology

Applications of Technology

Tech Tool: Using Googledocs to Collaborate How To Collaborate in Google Docs (zapier.com).

Springer Nature Resource: Check out medical researcher Lingard’s (2021). Practical advice on collaborative writing teams Collaborative writing: Strategies and activities for writing productively together | SpringerLink.

Online Video: Using technology for collaboration in writing provides a quick overview of not only how to use email for collaborative communications but also how to navigate document tracking systems (such as Microsoft Word’s Track Changes feature or Adobe Acrobat) as well as web-based collaboration systems (wikis, Google Docs). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJlJCwmnV8M.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jalongo, M.R. (2023). Writing Together: Collaborative Work. In: Renck Jalongo, M., Saracho, O.N. (eds) Scholarly Writing. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39516-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39516-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39515-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39516-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics