Abstract
Finding a suitable writing partner and working with a successful writing team can be one of the most satisfying ways of generating a publishable manuscript. Conversely, when collaborative writing arrangements and agreements falter or fail, they can be exceptionally troublesome. This chapter is designed to help authors maximize the benefits of collaborative writing and minimize the mistakes. Writing relationships built by academic co-authors are complex and should not be entered into lightly. Rather, each project undertaken requires thoughtful consideration of the unique contribution that every contributor will make. A common mistake of beginners is to invite someone affable, equally inexperienced, and like-minded to be a co-author in hopes that it will expedite matters, make writing more pleasurable, and offer uncritical acceptance. This approach runs contrary to research and practice on collaborative writing. Evidently, collaboration is more often successful when inexperienced writers partner with more experienced authors, co-contributors have unique perspectives/complementary strengths, and team members critically evaluate one another’s work. Furthermore, while a “divide and conquer” strategy with writing has intuitive appeal, assembling various pieces is insufficient. The finished product still needs to have a consistent tone and voice, and this can require an additional investment of time during editing. Even more difficult are situations when co-authors fail to meet deadlines, produce something unusable, or expect more credit than deserved. Throughout this chapter, we argue that collaborative writing is both an interprofessional and an interpersonal relationship. As such, it merits careful selection of co-authors, thoughtful planning, ongoing communication, and skillful editing of the final, published version of a manuscript.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, Z. (2022, October 12). Student mental health is in crisis. Campuses are rethinking their approach. Monitor, 53(7) (apa.org).
American Association of University Professors (AAUP). (2023). Background facts on contingent faculty positions.
American Council on Education. (2023). American college presidents study. American College President Study (acenet.edu).
American Psychological Association (APA). (2022, May). Publication practices and responsible authorship (apa.org).
Applebee, D. C. (2017, September). The soft skills college students need to succeed now and in the future. Psychology Student Network, (apa.org).
Axelrod, R. B., Cooper, C. R., Carillo, E. C., & Cleaves, W. T. (2021). The St. Martin’s guide to writing (13th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Badenhorst, C., Mcleod, H., Vaandering, D., Li, X., Joy, R., Penney, S. C., Pickett, S., & Hesson, J. (2016). The journey between there and here: Stories of a faculty writing group. Canadian Journal of Education, 39, 1–26.
Baggs, J. G. (2008). Editorial: Issues and rules for authors concerning authorship versus acknowledgements, dual publication, self-plagiarism, and salami publishing. Research in Nursing and Health, 31(4), 295–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20280
Barbosa, M. W., & Ferreira-Lopes, L. (2021). Emerging trends in telecollaboration and virtual exchange: A bibliometric study. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1907314
Bingham-Risher, R., & Armstrong, J. (2019). Faculty writing studio: A place to write. In N. Simons & A. Singh (Eds.), Critical collaborative communities: Academic writing partnerships, groups, and retreats (pp. 66–77). Brill.
Centers for Disease Control. (2005). Authorship policy (cdc.gov).
Chisholm, R. M. (1990). Coping with the problems of collaborative writing. Writing Across the Curriculum, 11, 90–108. chisholm.pdf (colostate.edu).
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2021). COPE flowcharts and infographics—Ghost, guest, or gift authorship in a submitted manuscript—English. Ghost, guest or gift authorship suspected in paper (publicationethics.org).
Compose.ly (2020, March 30). The top 7 online collaborative writing tools. The Top 7 Online Collaborative Writing Tools|Compose.ly.
Da Silva, J. A. T., & Dobranszki, J. (2016). Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: Ethical challenges, ghost and guest/gift authorship, and the cultural/disciplinary perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3
de Caux, B. C., Pretorius, L., & Macaulay, L. (Eds.). (2022). Research and teaching in a pandemic world: The challenges of establishing academic identities during times of crisis. Springer.
Diversi, M., Gale, K., Moreira, C., & Wyatt, J. (2020). Writing with: Collaborative writing as hope and resistance. International Review of Qualitative Research, 14(2), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940844720978761
Editors of Nature. (2015). Why interdisciplinary research matters. Nature, 525, 305. https://doi.org/10.1038/525305a
Eise, J. (2019, January 28). Herding experts and polishing text. Nature Careers. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07814-y
Encyclopedia.com. (2018, May 9). Folkore and mythology. Damocles, sword of. Sword Of Damocles|Encyclopedia.com.
Errecaborde, K. M., Macy, K. W., Pekol, A., Perez, S., O’Brien, M. K., Allen, I., Contadini, F., Lee, J. Y., Mumford, E., Bender, J. B., & Pelican, K. (2019). Factors that enable effective one health collaborations: A scoping review of the literature. PLoS ONE, 14(12), e0224660. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224660
Fidelity Investments and The Chronicle of Higher Education. (2021, February 25). Fidelity investments and the chronicle of higher education study: More than half of college and university faculty consider leaving teaching, citing burnout caused by pandemic.
Gadlin, H., & Jessar, K. (2001). Preempting discord: Prenuptial agreements for scientists. ORI: The Office of Research Integrity. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Preempting Discord: Prenuptial Agreements for Scientists.
Gale, K., Speedy, J., & Wyatt, J. (2014). Collaborative writing as inquiry. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Germano, W. (2021). On revision: The only writing that counts. University of Chicago Press.
Gomez-Ferri, J., Gonzalez-Alcaide, G., & Lopis-Goig, R. (2019). Measuring dissatisfaction with co-authorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers’ perception. Journal of Informetrics, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.100980
Greenbaum, A. (2002). Emancipatory movements in composition: The rhetoric of possibility. SUNY Press.
Haghani, M., Abbasi, A., Zwack, C. C., Shahhoseini, Z., & Haslam, N. (2022). Trends of research productivity across author gender and research fields: A multidisciplinary and multi-country observational study. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271998
Healey, M., & Matthews, K. E. (2017). Learning together through international collaborative writing groups. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 5(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.1.2
Henriksen, D. (2016). The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013). Scientometrics, 107, 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1849-x
Holgate, S. A. (2012, July 20). How to collaborate. Science Careers. AAAS.
Hyer, M. C., Landau, J. L., & Workman, J. L. (2021). Recovering from burnout and budget cuts by cultivating writing communities. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 12, 149–168. openjournal.lib.miamioh.edu/index.php/jctl/article/download/213/115/ (Valdosta State)
Jalongo, M. R. (2002). Writing for publication: A practical guide for educators. Christopher-Gordon.
Jensen, J. (2017). Write no matter what: Advice for academics. University of Chicago Press.
Kerr, C. (2011, September). Quoted in D. W. Burr. Is university parking a common grievance? Parking Today | Articles—Is University Parking a Common Grievance? (parkingtodaymedia.com).
Kohrt, B. A., Upadhaya, N., Luitel, N. P., Maharjan, S. M., Kaiser, B. N., MacFarlane, E. K., & Khan, N. (2014). Authorship in global mental health research: Recommendations for collaborative approaches to writing and publishing. Levy Library Press.
Kramer, L. (2023, February 15). How to write collaboratively. Write well with others: A guide to collaborative writing | Grammarly.
Lam, C. K. C., Hoang, C. H., Lau, R. W. K., de Caux, B. C., Chen, Y., Tan, O. O., et al. (2017). Experiential learning in doctoral training programmes: Fostering personal epistemology through collaboration. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1482863
Lingard, L. (2021). Collaborative writing: Strategies and activities for writing productively together. Perspectives on Medical Education, 10, 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00668-7
Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. R. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. International Journal of Business Communication, 41(1), 66–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943603259363
Mallapaty, S. (2018, January 30). Paper authorship goes hyper. Nature Porfolio. Paper authorship goes hyper | News | Nature Index
Manny, K., & Levitas, J. (2023). Academic integrity policies. Academic Integrity | Policy & Examples | Study.com.
Marr, B. (2022, September 12). Top 16 essential soft skills for the future of work. Top 16 essential soft skills for the future of work (forbes.com).
Matthews, K. E., Marquis, B., & Healey, M. (2016). International collaborative writing groups as communities of practice. In J. McDonald, & A. Cater-Steel (Eds.), Implementing communities of practice in higher education (pp. 597–617). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2866-3_26
McMurtrie, B. (2020, November 5). The pandemic is dragging on. professors are burning out. Overwhelmed and undersupported, instructors see no end in sight. The Chronicle of Higher Education. mi-ace_mentoring_mondays_12.14.20.pdf (gvsu.edu).
McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publications. PNAS Newsletter, 115(11), 2558–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115
Nairn, K., Cameron, J., Anakin, M., Juntrasook, A., Wass, R., Sligo, J. et al. (2014). Negotiating the challenge of collaborative writing: Learning from one writing group’s mutiny 596–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.973383
Nancarrow, S. A., Booth, A., Ariss, S., Smith, T., Enderby, P., & Roots, A. (2013). Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Human Resources for Health, 11(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-19
National Science Foundation. (2018). Science and Engineering Indicators 2018. S&E Indicators 2018 | NSF—National Science Foundation.
Nature Portfolio. (2023). Authorship. Nature Porfolio.
Ness, V., Duffy, K., McCallum, J., & Price, L. (2014). Getting published: Reflections of a collaborative writing group. Nurse Education Today, 34(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.03.019
Nevin, A. I., Thousand, J. S., & Villa, R. A. (2011). Working with co-authors. In T. Rocco & T. Hatcher (Eds.), Teaching and writing for scholarly publication: A guide for faculty & graduate students (pp. 272–329). Jossey-Bass.
Pahl, K., Steadman-Jones, R., & Vasudevan, L. (2023). Collaborative research in theory and practice: The poetics of letting go. Bristol University Press.
Parish, A. J., Boyack, K. W. & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research. PLoS One, e0189742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189742
Perkel, J. M. (2020). Synchronized editing: The future of collaborative writing. Nature, 580, 154–155. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00916-6
Pololi, L., & Knight, S. (2005). Mentoring faculty in academic medicine: A new paradigm? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(9), 866–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.05007.x
Rasmussen, L., Williams, C. E., Hausfeld, M. M., Banks, G., & Davis, B. C. (2020). Authorship policies at US doctoral universities: A review and recommendations for future policies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 3393–3413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00273-7
Reardon, D. (2019). Conclusion: Protecting and promoting higher education’s greatest resource. In A. G. Welch, J. H. Bolin & D. Reardon (Eds.). Mid-career faculty: Trends, barriers, and possibilities (pp. 217–221). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004408180_012
Remein, C. D., Childs, E., Beard, J., Demers, L. B., Benjamin, E. J., & Wingerter, S. L. (2022). Getting started: A pilot introductory narrative writing session for interprofessional faculty in academic health sciences. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 13, 265–274. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S350246
Ribeiro, L. C., Rapini, M. S., Silva, L. A., & Albuquerque, E. M. (2018). Growth patterns of the network of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics, 114, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2573-x
Robles, M. M. (2012). Executive perceptions of the top 10 soft skills needed in today’s workplace. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569912460400
Rodas, E. L., Columbo, L., Calle, M. D., & Cordero, G. (2021). Looking at faculty writing groups from within: Some insights for their sustainability and future implementations. International Journal for Academic Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1976189
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a big five in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405277134
Schwartz, J. P. (2011). Silence is not golden: Making collaborations work. The Office of Research Integrity. Silence is not Golden: Making Collaborations Work | ORI—The Office of Research Integrity (hhs.gov).
Scott III, R. H. (2022, November 16). Ensuring ethics and integrity in co-authorship. Ensuring Ethics and Integrity in Co-Authorship | AACSB.
Smith, L., Hande, K., & Kennedy, B. B. (2020). Mentoring nursing faculty: An inclusive scholarship support group. Nurse Educator, 45(4), 185–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000736
Springer Nature. (2019). https://files.springernature.com/getResource/Collaboration%20in%20Research%20report.pdf
Strawser, M. G. (2019). Maintaining an active scholarly agenda and creating a culture of teaching and learning scholarship. Journal of Faculty Development, 33(3), 117–120.
Tusting, K., McCulloch, S., Bhatt, I., Hamilton, M., & Barton, D. (2019). Academics writing: The dynamics of knowledge creation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429197994
University of Nebraska, Office of Graduate Studies. (2023). Best practices for collaborating on research. Graduate Connections. Best Practices for Collaborating on Research | Graduate Connections | Nebraska (unl.edu).
University of Virginia (2023). Online ethics center for engineering and science. Topics: Authorship | Online Ethics.
Vanderbilt Center for Teaching (2023). Collaborative writing. Collaborative Writing | Center for Teaching | Vanderbilt University.
Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Growth of international collaboration in science: Revisiting six specialties. Scientometrics, 110, 1633–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2230-9
Woolston, C. (2002, April 1). When a mentor becomes a thief. Chronicle of Higher Education, When a Mentor Becomes a Thief (chronicle.com).
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
Xia, P., Yangwei, X., Zequan, X., & Li, Y. (2022, in press). Exploring librarians' intentions to collaborate in research: A model integrating the theory of planned behavior and social exchange theory. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221104259
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Applications of Technology
Applications of Technology
Tech Tool: Using Googledocs to Collaborate How To Collaborate in Google Docs (zapier.com).
Springer Nature Resource: Check out medical researcher Lingard’s (2021). Practical advice on collaborative writing teams Collaborative writing: Strategies and activities for writing productively together | SpringerLink.
Online Video: Using technology for collaboration in writing provides a quick overview of not only how to use email for collaborative communications but also how to navigate document tracking systems (such as Microsoft Word’s Track Changes feature or Adobe Acrobat) as well as web-based collaboration systems (wikis, Google Docs). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJlJCwmnV8M.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jalongo, M.R. (2023). Writing Together: Collaborative Work. In: Renck Jalongo, M., Saracho, O.N. (eds) Scholarly Writing. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39516-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39516-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39515-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39516-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)