Skip to main content

A Primer on Open Science-Driven Repository Platforms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Metadata and Semantic Research (MTSR 2022)

Abstract

Following Open Science mandates, institutions and communities increasingly demand repositories with native support for publishing scientific literature together with research data, software, and other research products. Such repositories may be thematic or general-purpose and are deeply integrated with the scholarly communication ecosystem to ensure versioning, persistent identifiers, data curation, usage stats, and so on. Identifying the most suitable off-the-shelf repository platform is often a non-trivial task as the choice depends on functional requirements, programming and technical skills, and infrastructure resources.

This work analyses four state-of-the-art Open Source repository platforms, namely Dryad, Dataverse, DSpace, and InvenioRDM, from both a functional and a software perspective. This work intends to provide an overview serving as a primer for choosing repository platform solutions in different application scenarios. Moreover, this paper highlights how these platforms reacted to some key Open Science demands, moving away from the original and old-fashioned concept of a repository serving as a static container of files and metadata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.eprints.org.

  2. 2.

    https://duraspace.org/fedora.

  3. 3.

    http://ngr.coar-repositories.org.

  4. 4.

    https://eosc-portal.eu.

  5. 5.

    https://www.jisc.ac.uk/irus.

  6. 6.

    https://makedatacount.org.

  7. 7.

    https://www.openaire.eu.

  8. 8.

    https://support.datacite.org/docs/counter-code-of-practice.

  9. 9.

    https://datadryad.org.

  10. 10.

    https://datadryad.org/stash/faq#files.

  11. 11.

    https://github.com/CDL-Dryad/dryad-app.

  12. 12.

    https://dataverse.org.

  13. 13.

    https://github.com/iqss/dataverse.

  14. 14.

    https://guides.dataverse.org/en/latest/admin/external-tools.html#inventory-of-external-tools.

  15. 15.

    https://openjournalsystems.com.

  16. 16.

    https://www.researchspace.com.

  17. 17.

    https://dspace.lyrasis.org.

  18. 18.

    https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/DSDOC6x/Curation+System#CurationSystem-Tasks.

  19. 19.

    https://github.com/dspace/dspace.

  20. 20.

    https://inveniosoftware.org/products/rdm.

  21. 21.

    https://github.com/inveniosoftware/invenio-app-rdm.

References

  1. Rodrigues, E., et al.: Next generation repositories: behaviours and technical recommendations of the COAR next generation repositories working group. Zenodo (2017). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1215014

  2. Dempsey, L.: Library collections in the life of the user: two directions. LIBER Q.: J. Assoc. Eur. Res. Librar. 26(4), 338–359 (2016). https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10170

  3. Austin, C., Brown, S., Fong, N., Humphrey, C., Leahey, A., Webster, P.: Research data repositories: review of current features, gap analysis, and recommendations for minimum requirements (Version 0) (2015). https://doi.org/10.29173/iq904

  4. Assante, M., Candela, L., Castelli, D., Tani, A.: Are scientific data repositories coping with research data publishing? Data Sci. J. 15, 6 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2016-006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jean-Claude, B., et al.: Open science, open data, and open scholarship: European policies to make science fit for the twenty-first century. Front. Big Data (2) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00043

  6. RepOSGate: Open Science Gateways for Institutional Repositories, Michele Artini, Leonardo Candela, Paolo Manghi & Silvia Giannini

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jwa, A.S., Poldrack, R.A.: The spectrum of data sharing policies in neuroimaging data repositories. Hum. Brain Mapp. 43(8), 2707–2721 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Forero, D.A., Curioso, W.H., Patrinos, G.P.: The importance of adherence to international standards for depositing open data in public repositories. BMC Res. Notes 14, 405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05817-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liaw, S.-T., et al.: Quality assessment of real-world data repositories across the data life cycle: a literature review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 28(7), 1591–1599 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Löffler, F., Wesp, V., König-Ries, B., Klan, F.: Dataset search in biodiversity research: do metadata in data repositories reflect scholarly information needs? PLoS ONE 16(3), e0246099 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bashir, S., Gul, S., Bashir, S., Nisa, N.T., Ganaie, S.A.: Evolution of institutional repositories: managing institutional research output to remove the gap of academic elitism. J. Librarianship Inf. Sci. 54(3), 518–531 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211009592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barrueco, J.M., Termens, M.: Digital preservation in institutional repositories: a systematic literature review. Digit. Libr. Perspect. 38(2), 161–174 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-02-2021-0011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boch, M., et al.: A systematic review of data management platforms. In: Rocha, A., Adeli, H., Dzemyda, G., Moreira, F. (eds.) WorldCIST 2022. LNNS, vol. 469, pp. 15–24. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04819-7_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Mannocci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bardi, A., Manghi, P., Mannocci, A., Ottonello, E., Pavone, G. (2023). A Primer on Open Science-Driven Repository Platforms. In: Garoufallou, E., Vlachidis, A. (eds) Metadata and Semantic Research. MTSR 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1789. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39141-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39141-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39140-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39141-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics