Abstract
This chapter analyzes the perception of workers at a federal university about work-related stress factors in the first weeks after the mandatory home office due to the Covid-19 pandemic between February and April 2020. This cross-sectional study included 898 university employees who answered a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Health Safety Executive-Indicator Tool (HSE-IT), an instrument that evaluates psychosocial risk factors and work-related stress. The sample was divided between before and after the definition of compulsory home office in the institution. Mean comparisons were performed for independent samples. Results revealed that there were significant differences in the Demand and Relationship dimensions, especially among female participants. The study identified psychosocial risks among university employees in contexts of crisis, emergency changes and remote work. Implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amsalem, D., Dixon, L. B., & Neria, Y. (2020). The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak and mental health: Current risks and recommended actions. JAMA Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1730
Balanzá-Martínez, V., Atienza-Carbonell, B., Kapczinski, F., & Boni, R. B. D. (2020). Lifestyle behaviours during the COVID-19-time to connect. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 141(5), 399–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13177
de Lucca, S. R., & Sobral, R. C. (2017). Aplicação de instrumento para o diagnóstico dos fatores de risco psicossociais nas organizações. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho, 15(1), 63–72.
Delfini, M., Drolas, A., Montes Cató, J., & Spinosa, L. (2020). Lidiando con el trabajo. Impacto del COVID-19 sobre el trabajo productivo y reproductivo. Trabajo y sociedad, 21(35), 1–3.
Edwards, J. A., Webster, S., Laar, D. V., & Easton, S. (2008). Psychometric analysis of the UKUK Health and Safety Executive’s Management Standards work-related stress Indicator Tool. Work & Stress, 22(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802166599
Hayes, S., Priestley, J. L., Ishmakhametov, N., & Ray, H. E. (2020). “I’m not working from home, i’m living at work”: Perceived stress and work-related burnout before and during COVID-19 [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vnkwa
Lanchimba, C., Bonilla-Bolaños, A., & Díaz-Sánchez, J. P. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Theoretical scenarios of its socioeconomic impacts in Latin America and the Caribbean. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 40(4), 622–646. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572020-3199
Moreira, W. C., de Sousa, A. R., & Nóbrega, M. d. P. S. d. S. (2020). Mental illness in the general population and health professionals during Covid-19: A scoping review. Texto & Contexto – Enfermagem, 29. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2020-0215
Pina, J. A., & Stotz, E. N. (2014). Intensificação do trabalho e saúde do trabalhador: Uma abordagem teórica. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 39(130), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1590/0303-7657000074913
Prasad, K. D. V., Vaidya, R. W., & Mangipudi, M. R. (2020). Effect of occupational stress and remote working on psychological well-being of employees: An empirical analysis during covid-19 pandemic concerning information technology industry in Hyderabad. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 11(2), 1–13.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Revised Edition). Sage.
Shimazu, A., Nakata, A., Nagata, T., Arakawa, Y., Kuroda, S., Inamizu, N., & Yamamoto, I. (2020). Psychosocial impact of COVID-19 for general workers. Journal of Occupational Health, 62(1), e12132. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12132
Sinclair, R. R., Allen, T., Barber, L., Bergman, M., Britt, T., Butler, A., Ford, M., Hammer, L., Kath, L., Probst, T., & Yuan, Z. (2020). Occupational health science in the time of COVID-19: Now more than ever. Occupational Health Science, 4(1–2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-020-00064-3
Souza, D. d. O. (2021). As dimensões da precarização do trabalho em face da pandemia de Covid-19. Trabalho, Educação e Saúde, 19, e00311143. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-7746-sol00311
Staniscuaski, F., Kmetzsch, L., Zandonà, E., Reichert, F., Soletti, R. C., Ludwig, Z. M. C., Lima, E. F., Neumann, A., Schwartz, I. V. D., Mello-Carpes, P. B., Tamajusuku, A. S. K., Werneck, F. P., Ricachenevsky, F. K., Infanger, C., Seixas, A., Staats, C. C., & Oliveira, L. de. (2020). Gender, race, and parenthood impact academic productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic: From survey to action. BioRxiv, 2020.07.04.187583. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.04.187583
von Gaudecker, H.-M., Holler, R., Janys, L., Siflinger, B., & Zimpelmann, C. (2020). Labour supply in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical evidence on hours, home office, and expectations (SSRN scholarly paper ID 3579251). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3579251
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Valls Atz, M., Remor, E. (2023). Perceptions of Work-Related Stress Factors in Brazilian Public University Employees at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic. In: Portillo, N., Morgan, M.L., Gallegos, M. (eds) Psychology and Covid-19 in the Americas. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38502-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38502-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38501-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38502-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)