Skip to main content

Abstract

Lean philosophy has been widely introduced in many manufacturing and service industries, allowing for increased operational gains and creating a relationship between the work environment and the workers’ well-being. This study aims to understand the relationship between Lean and workers' well-being on a shop floor. A questionnaire based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model was conducted in an industrial company in Brazil, and a total of 165 responses were collected. Through an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), eight factors were identified (soft Lean practices, Lean training, the pace of work, small group problem solving, interdependencies, problem-solving work demands, engagement and exhaustion). Posteriorly, a cluster analysis allowed us to identify 3 distinct groups in the sample, cluster 1 – includes those employees with a high level of engagement and exhaustion: cluster 2 – employees with a moderate level of engagement and exhaustion; and cluster 3 – employees with a low level of engagement and exhaustion. Additionally, using multiple linear regression analysis, it can be concluded that soft Lean practices (0.46) and the pace of work (−0.23) are the variables that most influence the engagement, and the same can be observed regarding exhaustion, where soft Lean practices (−0.36) and pace of work (0.40) also present statistically significant results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh, J., Singh, H.: Enigma of KAIZEN approach in manufacturing industry of Northern India. Int. J. Qual. Reliabil. Manage. 35(1), 187–207 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jasti, K., Kodali, R.: A literature review of empirical research methodology in lean manufacturing. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 34(8), 1080–1122 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Langstrand, J., Drotz, E.: The rhetoric and reality of lean: a multiple case study. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 27(3–4), 398–412 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huo, M., Boxall, P.: Are all aspects of Lean production bad for workers? An analysis of how problem-solving demands affect employee well-being. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 28(4), 569–584 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leyer, M., Reus, M., Moormann, J.: How satisfied are employees with lean environments? Prod. Plann. Control. 32(1), 52–62 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Doi, Y.: An epidemiologic review on occupational sleep research among Japanese workers. Ind. Health 43(1), 3–10 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Halbesleben, J.R.B., Buckley, M.R.: Burnout in organizational life. J. Manag. 30(6), 859–879 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beraldin, A.R., Danese, P., Romano, P.: An investigation of the relationship between lean and well-being based on the job demands-resources model. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 39(12), 1295–1322 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasle, P., Bojesen, A., Jensen, P., Bramming, P.: Lean and the working environment: a review of the literature. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 32(7), 829–849 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parker, S.K.: Longitudinal effects of Lean production on employee outcomes and the mediating role of work characteristics. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(4), 620–634 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson, P.R., Mullarkey, S.: Lean production teams and health in garment manufacture. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 5(2), 231–245 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seppala, P., Klemola, S.: How do employees perceive their organization and job when companies adopt principles of lean production? Hum. Fact. Ergon. Manufact. Serv. Ind. 14(2), 157–180 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Soliman, M., Saurin, T., Anzanello, M.: The impacts of Lean production on the complexity of socio-technical systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 197, 342–357 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jayamaha, N.P., Wagner, J.P., Grigg, N.P., et al.: Testing a theoretical model underlying the ‘Toyota Way’ – an empirical study involving a large global sample of Toyota facilities. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(14), 4332–4350 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor, A., Taylor, M., McSweeney, A.: Towards greater understanding of success and survival of Lean systems. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(22), 6607–6630 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Magnani, F., Carbone, V., Moatti, V.: The human dimension of lean: a literature review. Supply Chain Forum. 20(2), 132–144 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Varadaraj, A., Ananth, S.: The effect of Lean on job satisfaction. Int. J. Intell. Enterp. 7(1/2/3), 137–154 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., Roos., D.: The Machine that Changed the World. Macmillan, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hines, P., Holweg, M., Rich, N.: A review of contemporary lean thinking. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 24(10), 994–1011 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alves, A.C., Dinis-Carvalho, J., Sousa, R.M.: Lean production as promoter of thinkers to achieve companies’ agility. Learn. Organ. 19(3), 219–237 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhamu, J., Sangwan, K.S.: Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 34(7), 876–940 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Psomas, E., Antony, J.: Research gaps in Lean manufacturing: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Qual. Reliabil. Manage. 36(5), 815–839 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bamber, G., Stanton, P., Bartram, T., Ballardie, R.: Human resource management, lean processes and outcomes for employees: towards a research agenda. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 25(21), 2881–2891 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Nachreiner, F., Schaufeli, W.B.: The job demands-resources model of burnout. . Appl. Psychol. 86, 499–512 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Herzberg, F.I.: Work and the Nature of Man. 3rd edn Thomas Y. Crowell Co. (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hackman, J.R.: Work redesign and motivation. Prof. Psychol. 11(3), 445–455 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Karasek, R.A.: Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job design. Adm. Sci. Q. 24(2), 285–308 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huo, M., Boxall, P.: Lean production and the well-being of the frontline manager: the job demands - resources model as a diagnostic tool in Chinese manufacturing. Asia Pacific J. Hum. Resour. 55(3), 280–297 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ulhassan, W., Schwarz, U., Thor, J., et al.: Interactions between Lean management and the psychosocial work environment in a hospital setting – a multi-method study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 14, 480 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stone, K.B.: Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma. 3(2), 112–132 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E.: The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 22(3), 309–328 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jackson, P.R., Martin, R.: Impact of just-in-time on job content, employee attitudes and well-being: a longitudinal study. Ergonomics 39(1), 1–16 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Longoni, A., Pagell, M., Johnston, D., Veltri, A.: When does Lean hurt? An exploration of lean practices and worker health and safety outcomes. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(11), 3300–3320 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hair, J., Baben, B., Money, A., Samouel, P.: Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em gestão. Editora Bookman (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hopp, W.J.: Positive Lean: merging the science of efficiency with the psychology of work. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56(1–2), 398–413 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gaiardelli, P., Resta, B., Dotti, S.: Exploring the role of human factors in Lean management. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma. 10(1), 339–366 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is sponsored by national funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia–, under the project UIDB/00285/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luís Miguel D. F. Ferreira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Calcerano, T., Ferreira, L.M.D.F., Pinto, A. (2024). The Well-Being of Workers in Lean Manufacturing Work Environments. In: Silva, F.J.G., Ferreira, L.P., Sá, J.C., Pereira, M.T., Pinto, C.M.A. (eds) Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing: Establishing Bridges for More Sustainable Manufacturing Systems. FAIM 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38165-2_90

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38165-2_90

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38164-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38165-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics