Skip to main content

Arrangement of Working Bodies on the Cultivator Frame Based on Hydrodynamic Analogy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fundamental and Applied Scientific Research in the Development of Agriculture in the Far East (AFE-2022) (AFE 2023)

Abstract

By analogy with hydrodynamic processes, when cultivating the soil with the “stingray” working bodies, the equilibrium of the fluid flow in the pipe is considered, which is obtained by the upper destroyed soil layer at a constant speed of the cultivator. The aim of the work is to arrange the working bodies on the frame. In the structure of the total duration of the tillage process by the “stingray” working body, the reduction of the transition process contributes to an increase in the established form of the “stingray” working body. To ensure the overlap of the “stingray” working bodies, it is advisable to place them on the frame at an angle to the direction of movement of the unit, according to the arrow-shaped scheme. When placing the “stingray” working bodies on the cultivator frame, it is necessary to ensure the overlap of the working bodies in the transverse direction. When placing the “stingray” working bodies in the longitudinal direction, a sufficient distance in the longitudinal direction should be provided to ensure coverage of the deformation zone of the interstand space. The relations revealing the interrelation of the parameters of the arrangement of the “stingray” working body on the cultivator frame with the physico-mechanical properties characterised by soil friction are obtained. The arrangement of the “stingray” working bodies on the frame is in the transverse and longitudinal direction 0.35–0.40 m and at least 0.50 m, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mudarisov SG, Sultanov SM (2006) Achievements Sci Technol Agric 8:35–36

    Google Scholar 

  2. Makarenko AN, Martynova IV (2016) Bull Bryansk State Agric Acad 3(55):76–82

    Google Scholar 

  3. Makarenko AN, Martynova IV (2018) Actual problems of agroengineering and ways to solve them, May, November 19, 2018. V. Ya. Gorin Belgorod State Agrarian University, Maiskiy, pp 94–99

    Google Scholar 

  4. Volik BA, Lepet EI, Konoviy AV (2018) Environ Eng 2(10):45–48

    Google Scholar 

  5. Babitsky LF, Sobolevsky IV (2016) News Agric Sci Taurida 6(169):50–59

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parkhomenko GG, Parkhomenko SG (2018) Tractors Agric Mach 1:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Babitsky LF, Moskalevich VY, Sobolevsky IV (2017) Agric Sci Euro-North-East 4(59):68–71

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang M, Li J (2018) Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2861

  9. Gazonas GA, Wildman RA, Hopkins DA, Scheidler MJ (2018) Arch Appl Mech 88(8):1275–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-018-1372-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mamkagh A (2019) Asian J Adv Agric Res 9(1):1–7 https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAAR/2019/46706 https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAAR/2019/46706

  11. Panagos P, Borrelli P, Poesen J et al (2015) Environ Sci Policy 54:438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.012

  12. Chappell A, Webb N (2016) Aeol Res 23:63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Katra I, Gross A, Swet N et al (2016) Sci Rep 6:24736. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Adhikari K, Hartemink AE (2016) Geoderma 262:101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Couvreur V, Vanderborght J, Draye X, Javaux M (2014) Water Resour Res 50(11):8891–8906. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sándor Z, Tállai M, Kincses I et al (2020) DRC Sustain Future 1(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.37281/DRCSF/1.1.3

  17. Botta GF, Antille DL, Bienvenido F et al (2019) Engineering for rural development. Jelgava 22:174–178. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2019.18.N216

  18. Mairghanya M, Yahya A, Adam NM et al (2019) Soil Tillage Res 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104318

  19. Akuraju VR, Ryu D, George B et al (2017) Agric For Meteorol 232:489–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fang Y, Du Y, Wang J et al (2017). Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00672

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Galina Parkhomenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Parkhomenko, G., Kambulov, S., Pakhomov, V. (2024). Arrangement of Working Bodies on the Cultivator Frame Based on Hydrodynamic Analogy. In: Zokirjon ugli, K.S., Muratov, A., Ignateva, S. (eds) Fundamental and Applied Scientific Research in the Development of Agriculture in the Far East (AFE-2022). AFE 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 733. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37978-9_102

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics