Abstract
In this paper, the performance of portfolios consisting of stocks selected with the recently proposed expected utility, entropy and variance (EU–EV) risk model is analysed. The portfolios were constructed using data of the PSI 20 index, from January 2019 to December 2020, by reducing the number of stock components to the half with the EU–EV risk model. The efficiency of these portfolios in terms of the mean–variance model was shown to be approximately equal to the efficiency of portfolios obtained from the whole set of stocks. The aim is to evaluate the performance of the constructed portfolios, by comparing their in-sample and out-of-sample results with those of the benchmark. For that purpose, cumulative returns in the in-sample period from January 2019 to December 2020 and in the out-of-sample period from January 2021 to December 2022, considering both an one-year and a two-year time horizon, as well as different performance metrics, such as Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, Beta and Alpha, are analysed. The results reveal that the portfolios constructed with the EU–EV risk model outperform the benchmark portfolio in the given periods, where a better performance was obtained in the one-year out-of-sample period. These results suggest that the strategy of constructing portfolios using the best ranked stocks according to the EU–EV risk model can be useful for short-term investment objectives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bermejo, R., Figuerola-Ferretti, I., Hevia, T., Santos, A.: Factor investing: a stock selection methodology for the European equity market. Heliyon 7(10), e08168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08168
Brito, I.: A portfolio stock selection model based on expected utility, entropy and variance. Expert Syst. Appl. 213, Part A, 118896 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118896
Brito, I.: A decision model based on expected utility, entropy and variance. Appl. Math. Comput. 379, Article 125285 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125285
Brito, I.: The normalized expected utility - entropy and variance model for decisions under risk. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 148, 174–201 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2022.06.005
Chen, W., Zhang, H., Mehlawat, M.K., Jia, L.: mean-variance portfolio optimization using machine learning-based stock price prediction. Appl. Soft Comput. 100, Article 106943 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106943
DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., Uppal, R.: Optimal versus naive diversification: how inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Rev. Financ. Stud. 22(5), 1915–1953 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm075
Huang, C.F.: A hybrid stock selection model using genetic algorithms and support vector regression. Appl. Soft Comput. 12, 807–818 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2011.10.009
Li, B., Zhang, R.: A new mean-variance-entropy model for uncertain portfolio optimization with liquidity and diversification. Chaos Solitons Fractals 146, 110842 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110842
Malladi, R., Fabozzi, F.J.: Equal-weighted strategy: why it outperforms value-weighted strategies? Theory and evidence. J. Asset Manag. 18, 188–208 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-016-0033-4
Marhfor, A.: Portfolio performance measurement: review of literature and avenues of future research. Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag. 6, 432–438 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2016.64039
Markowitz, H.: Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)
Paiva, F.P., Cardoso, R.T.M., Hanaoka, G.P., Duarte, W.M.: Decision-making for financial trading: a fusion approach of machine learning and portfolio selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 115, 635–655 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.003
Samarakoon, L.P., Hasan, T.: Portfolio Performance Evaluation. In: Lee, CF., Lee, A.C. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Finance. Springer, Boston, MA (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-26336-6_60
Qin, Z., Li, X., Ji, X.: Portfolio selection based on fuzzy cross-entropy. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 228, 188–196 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2008.09.010
Xidonas, P., Essner, E.: On ESG portfolio construction: a multi-objective optimization approach. Comput. Econ. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-022-10327-6
Yang, J., Feng, Y. Qiu, W.: Stock selection for portfolios using expected utility-entropy decision model. Entropy 19, Article 508 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/e19100508
Acknowledgements
IB thanks support from FCT (“Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia”) through the Projects UIDB/00013/2020 and UIDP/00013/2020.
GJM acknowledges the financial support from FCT through the Project UIDB/04650/2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brito, I., Machado, G.J. (2023). Performance Evaluation of Portfolio Stocks Selected with the EU–EV Risk Model. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops. ICCSA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14105. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37108-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37108-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37107-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37108-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)