Skip to main content

Performance Evaluation of Portfolio Stocks Selected with the EU–EV Risk Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops (ICCSA 2023)

Abstract

In this paper, the performance of portfolios consisting of stocks selected with the recently proposed expected utility, entropy and variance (EU–EV) risk model is analysed. The portfolios were constructed using data of the PSI 20 index, from January 2019 to December 2020, by reducing the number of stock components to the half with the EU–EV risk model. The efficiency of these portfolios in terms of the mean–variance model was shown to be approximately equal to the efficiency of portfolios obtained from the whole set of stocks. The aim is to evaluate the performance of the constructed portfolios, by comparing their in-sample and out-of-sample results with those of the benchmark. For that purpose, cumulative returns in the in-sample period from January 2019 to December 2020 and in the out-of-sample period from January 2021 to December 2022, considering both an one-year and a two-year time horizon, as well as different performance metrics, such as Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, Beta and Alpha, are analysed. The results reveal that the portfolios constructed with the EU–EV risk model outperform the benchmark portfolio in the given periods, where a better performance was obtained in the one-year out-of-sample period. These results suggest that the strategy of constructing portfolios using the best ranked stocks according to the EU–EV risk model can be useful for short-term investment objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bermejo, R., Figuerola-Ferretti, I., Hevia, T., Santos, A.: Factor investing: a stock selection methodology for the European equity market. Heliyon 7(10), e08168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brito, I.: A portfolio stock selection model based on expected utility, entropy and variance. Expert Syst. Appl. 213, Part A, 118896 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118896

  3. Brito, I.: A decision model based on expected utility, entropy and variance. Appl. Math. Comput. 379, Article 125285 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125285

  4. Brito, I.: The normalized expected utility - entropy and variance model for decisions under risk. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 148, 174–201 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2022.06.005

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, W., Zhang, H., Mehlawat, M.K., Jia, L.: mean-variance portfolio optimization using machine learning-based stock price prediction. Appl. Soft Comput. 100, Article 106943 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106943

  6. DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., Uppal, R.: Optimal versus naive diversification: how inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Rev. Financ. Stud. 22(5), 1915–1953 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, C.F.: A hybrid stock selection model using genetic algorithms and support vector regression. Appl. Soft Comput. 12, 807–818 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2011.10.009

  8. Li, B., Zhang, R.: A new mean-variance-entropy model for uncertain portfolio optimization with liquidity and diversification. Chaos Solitons Fractals 146, 110842 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110842

  9. Malladi, R., Fabozzi, F.J.: Equal-weighted strategy: why it outperforms value-weighted strategies? Theory and evidence. J. Asset Manag. 18, 188–208 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-016-0033-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marhfor, A.: Portfolio performance measurement: review of literature and avenues of future research. Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag. 6, 432–438 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2016.64039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Markowitz, H.: Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paiva, F.P., Cardoso, R.T.M., Hanaoka, G.P., Duarte, W.M.: Decision-making for financial trading: a fusion approach of machine learning and portfolio selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 115, 635–655 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.003

  13. Samarakoon, L.P., Hasan, T.: Portfolio Performance Evaluation. In: Lee, CF., Lee, A.C. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Finance. Springer, Boston, MA (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-26336-6_60

  14. Qin, Z., Li, X., Ji, X.: Portfolio selection based on fuzzy cross-entropy. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 228, 188–196 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2008.09.010

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Xidonas, P., Essner, E.: On ESG portfolio construction: a multi-objective optimization approach. Comput. Econ. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-022-10327-6

  16. Yang, J., Feng, Y. Qiu, W.: Stock selection for portfolios using expected utility-entropy decision model. Entropy 19, Article 508 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/e19100508

Download references

Acknowledgements

IB thanks support from FCT (“Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia”) through the Projects UIDB/00013/2020 and UIDP/00013/2020.

GJM acknowledges the financial support from FCT through the Project UIDB/04650/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Brito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brito, I., Machado, G.J. (2023). Performance Evaluation of Portfolio Stocks Selected with the EU–EV Risk Model. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops. ICCSA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14105. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37108-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37108-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37107-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37108-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics