Skip to main content

Giuseppe Paolo Stanislao Occhialini (1907–1993) A Short Biography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Scientific Legacy of Beppo Occhialini

Abstract

The development of my studies is typical of those of many people of my generation. Those among us who started their research trying to understand the nature of cosmic rays had been induced to the hunting of new particles. Actually, for more than twenty years, the only source of new particles had been the cosmic radiation. In such a way, the positron, the \(\pi \)- and \(\mu \)-mesons, the K-mesons, and the hyperons had been discovered. In 1954, when the Bevatron, the big accelerating machine, able to produce strange particles and the anti-proton, started to work, this time of grace of the cosmic rays found its end. At that time the physicists, who had an easy, adventurous, and less expensive way, found themselves in front of a choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hand-written note by Occhialini’s wife. Undated, written after 1957. Original in Italian. Occhialini Papers 8, 3, 7.

  2. 2.

    The classification advanced by Brown and Hoddeson (the historical table is on p. 7) is based on a division in five time intervals of the whole history of cosmic-rays physics: (a) the prehistory (up to 1911); (b) the age of discovery and exploration (1911–1930); (c) the first particle age (1930–1946); (d) the second particle age (1947–1953); e) the astrophysics age (from 1953 on).

  3. 3.

    An enjoying fact concerns Beppo’s proper name: “The origin of his initials, G. P. S., supplies an amusing example of Occhialini’s unorthodox approach. At the beginning of his career, he styled himself, as most Italians, with a single first name: Giuseppe. Upon joining Blackett, he opted for multiple initials. He explained that he added “P” for Peppino (a nickname for Giuseppe), and “S” for Sommerfeld, a pseudonym under which he had run as a sprinter in his student days (during an exam period). In actual fact, the Biographical Encyclopedia of Scientists lists, in addition to Giuseppe, the names Paolo and Stanislao” [2]. A copy of his birth certificate, delivered in the ’50s (having been the original documents destroyed during the war) attests his full name to be Giuseppe Paolo Stanislao, though it is right that he signed his first papers only with his first name.

  4. 4.

    Biographical notes about Raffaele Augusto Occhialini can be found in [3].

  5. 5.

    Biographical information about Giuseppe Occhialini can be found in [2, 4,5,6,7,8,9].

  6. 6.

    Reference [9], quotation on p. 322.

  7. 7.

    Reference [9], quotation on p. 322.

  8. 8.

    Information about the course of physics in Florence, in the period took into account here, is in [10].

  9. 9.

    Reference [9], quotation on p. 322.

  10. 10.

    On Bruno Rossi, and his role in cosmic-ray physics in this period, see [11,12,13,14].

  11. 11.

    On the general situation of physics in Italy of that time, see [15, 16].

  12. 12.

    Beppo Occhialini, still a student, was looking for a theme as argument of the Thesis for his Laurea. One day he told me this story: his father Augusto, Professor of Physics in Genova, used to spend the summer months in Germany for his research programs in Atomic Spectroscopy and coming back in fall 1927 reported about the experiments of Bothe and Kohlhorster on the Cosmic Radiation. Beppo proposed “Cosmic Rays” as theme for the thesis to his tutor and Bruno, after a reconnaisance tour in Germany, decided to make “Cosmic Rays as the main field of the research activity for his group in Florence.” Quotation from [17] on slide 7.

  13. 13.

    On the early history of cosmic rays, see [18, 19], and the fundamental recollections in [20].

  14. 14.

    On the Arcetri School, see [21].

  15. 15.

    According to Occhialini, the Geiger-Müller counter was like the Colt in the Far West: a cheap instrument usable by everyone on one’s way through a hard frontier.

  16. 16.

    Reference [4], quotation on p. 334.

  17. 17.

    Reference [7], quotation on p. 64.

  18. 18.

    On the history of physics in Cambridge in the ’30s, see [25] and Blackett’s own reminiscences in [26].

  19. 19.

    On Rutherford at the Cavendish, see [27].

  20. 20.

    On the history of the use of the cloud chamber in physical researches, see the chapter “Cloud Chambers: The Peculiar Genius of British Physics” in [28], pp. 65–141.

  21. 21.

    On Blackett’s contributions to cosmic-ray physics with the cloud chamber, see [29].

  22. 22.

    On the controlled cloud chamber, see [30].

  23. 23.

    Reference [31], quotation on p. 18. Besides Lovell’s work, biographical informations on Blackett can be found in [32].

  24. 24.

    Reference [33], quotation on p. 144.

  25. 25.

    On the discovery of the positron see Hanson’s classical studies [37], De Maria and Russo’s historical reconstruction [38], and Roqué’s analysis [39].

  26. 26.

    Letter from P. M. S. Blackett (Manchester) to A. Occhialini (Genoa), November 21st 1948. Occhialini Papers 1, 1, 3.

  27. 27.

    On Gleb Wataghin in São Paulo, see [41].

  28. 28.

    On the early history of physical sciences in Brazil, see [42,43,44,45,46].

  29. 29.

    On Marcelo Damy de Souza Santos, see his interview [47].

  30. 30.

    On Mario Schönberg, see his interviews [48, 49].

  31. 31.

    On Cesar Lattes, see [50,51,52].

  32. 32.

    Reference [9], quotation on p. 323.

  33. 33.

    On the Biophysics Laboratory in Rio de Janeiro, see [53].

  34. 34.

    On the history of the Department of Physics in Bristol, see [54]. On the history of the Cosmic Ray School of Physics in Bristol, see [55].

  35. 35.

    On the history of the use of nuclear emulsions in physical researches, see the chapter “Nuclear Emulsions: The Anxiety of the Experimenter” in [28], pp. 143–238.

  36. 36.

    Reference [4], quotation on p. 336.

  37. 37.

    On the discovery of the \(\pi \)-meson and the contemporary discovery of the V-particles, see the recollection of reminiscences and papers in [56]. See also [57, 58]. On the researches concerning particle physics in the ’30 and ’40s, see also the recollections in [59].

  38. 38.

    Biographical information on Powell is in [60, 61].

  39. 39.

    Reference [60], quotation on p. 36.

  40. 40.

    Reference [54], quotation on p. 38.

  41. 41.

    On the reflecting microscope, see [64].

  42. 42.

    Here we had two of the greatest physicists of their time, experimenters who were destined to become Nobel Prize winners and men who had the ability to inspire the countless researchers who were attracted to work with them. It would be hard to find British cosmic-rayites who had not worked in either of their laboratories, and indeed many of the European (not forgetting Eastern European) cosmic-ray physicists had received part at least of their training in Manchester or Bristol.” Reference [69], quotation on p. 27.

  43. 43.

    Reference [4], quotation on p. 340.

  44. 44.

    Letter from Augusto Occhialini (Genoa) to Giuseppe Occhialini (Brussels) (1950). Occhialini Papers 5, 1, 2.

  45. 45.

    Letter from Cecil Powell (Bristol) to Giuseppe Occhialini (Brussels), May 12th, 1950. Powell Papers. Bristol University Special Collections DM 1947/E.303.

  46. 46.

    On the state of physical researches in Italy soon after WW II, see [71].

  47. 47.

    On biographical information on Constance Charlotte Dilworth, see [72, 73].

  48. 48.

    Reference [74], quotation on p. 737.

  49. 49.

    On the history of scientific and physical studies in Milan, see [78,79,80].

  50. 50.

    Reference [9], quotation on p. 324.

  51. 51.

    The G-Stack flight itself had been prepared in a very short time in order to precede the results that would have been with the accelerating machines soon after. “Leprince Ringuet expressed, with an elegant metaphor, the attitude to this threat. Rather than to ‘retire to the country and wait six months for Brookhaven to give the answers’, the community would continue to work in the field in the hope that the higher energy components of the cosmic rays would still reserve some surprises. It was in this sort of climate that the G-Stack collaboration was born. It was a last minute attempt to beat the machines.” Reference [74], quotation on p. 739.

  52. 52.

    See the paragraph on Bagnères-de-Bigorre in [81].

  53. 53.

    I would like to take the point of view that two particles are equal until they are proven different.” Reference [81], quotation on p. 8.

  54. 54.

    For the results of the G-Stack experiment see [82, 83].

  55. 55.

    Reference [5], quotation on pp. 614–615.

  56. 56.

    Beppo is certainly not a home cooking man: he discerns the potentiality of the “spark chamber” as a detector fit for balloons and satellites and begins a collaboration with Saclay which masters the spark chamber technology and that is also bring to pass a partial change, from particles to space.” Quotation from [5] on p. 616.

  57. 57.

    Reference [4], quotation on p. 338.

  58. 58.

    The GIFCO was born with the constitution of four laboratiories: the ITESRE in Bologna, the IFSI in Frascati, the IFCTR in Milan, and the CosmoGeofisica in Turin, with two divisions in Florence and Palermo. The Palermo division will be the fifth laboratory in 1981, the IFCAI. After the event, this well-intended operation might have suffered of some deficiencies in the coordination of the groups: “The CNR responded to the initiative, with the agility of an asthmatic pachyderm, by mistaking (I’m quoting Occhialini’s words) the timing typical of archaeological excavations in Pompei, for that necessary to the reaction to a fast countdown for a rocket on the launching pad.” Quotation from [5] on p. 617.

  59. 59.

    On the history of space physics in Europe, see [87, 88].

  60. 60.

    On the history of gamma-ray astronomy, see [89].

  61. 61.

    Reference [89], quotation on p. 45.

  62. 62.

    Reference [4], quotation on p. 339.

  63. 63.

    After Bruno Rossi was named the NASA X-Ray Explorer.

  64. 64.

    Reference [8], quotation on pp. 238–239.

  65. 65.

    Occhialini was one of the discoverers of a large cave in the French Pyrénées, the Pierre St. Martin Cave, 1342 m deep, which will be for a long time the deepest cave the world over.

References

  1. Brown L. M., Hoddeson L. (Editors), The Birth of Particle Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Telegdi V. “Giuseppe Occhialini. 5 December 1907–30 December 1993”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 146 (2002) 218–222.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emanuelli G. Scienziati fisico-matematici marchigiani: 1846-1951: Luigi Donati, Oreste Murani, Temistocle Calzecchi Onesti, Angelo Battelli, Ferdinando Lori, Raffaello Augusto Occhialini (Steu, Urbino) 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bignami G. F. “Giuseppe Paolo Stanislao Occhialini. 5 December 1907–30 December 1993”, Biographical Memoirs of the Fellows of the Royal Society of London 48 (2002) 331–340.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scarsi L. “Giuseppe Occhialini: Il secondo periodo italiano (1950-1993)”, Il Nuovo Cimento C 20 (1997) 613–618.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Polvani G. “Per i venti anni dal ritorno in Italia di Giuseppe Occhialini”, Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico e Fisico di Milano 39 (1969) 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Russo A. “Vita di uno sperimentatore”, Sapere 4 (1996) 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tagliaferri G. “Giuseppe Occhialini”, Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo Accademia di Scienze e Lettere 128 (1994) 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Occhialini G. P. S. “Occhialini, Giuseppe”, in Scienziati e Tecnologi Contemporanei, vol. II (Mondadori, Milan) 1974, pp. 322–324.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mandò M. Notizie sugli studi di Fisica (1859–1949), in Storia dell’Ateneo Fiorentino. Contributi di studio (Parretti, Firenze) 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clark G. W. “Bruno Benedetto Rossi. April 13, 1905–November 21, 1993”, Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 75 (1998) 310–341.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi B. B. “Early days in cosmic rays”, Physics today, vol. 34, No. 10 (1981) 34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bustamante M. C. “Bruno Rossi au début des années trente: une étape décisive dans la physique des rayons cosmiques”, Archives internationals d’histoire des sciences 44 (1994) 92–115.

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Maria M., Malizia G. and Russo A. “La nascita della fisica dei raggi cosmici in Italia e la scoperta dell’effetto Est-Ovest”, Giornale di Fisica 33 (1992) 207–228.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Galdabini S. and Giuliani G. “Physics in Italy between 1900 and 1940: The universities, physicists, funds, and research”, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 19 (1988) 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Russo A. “Science and industry in Italy between the two world wars”, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 16 (1986) 230–281.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Scarsi L. Cosmic Rays in Florence. Bruno Rossi and the “Group of Arcetri” in ECRS Florence 30 August–3 September 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xu Q. and Brown L. M. “The early history of cosmic ray research”, American Journal of Physics 55 (1987) 23-33.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Swann W. F. G. “The History of Cosmic Rays”, American Journal of Physics 29 (1961) 811–816.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sekido Y. and Elliot H. (Editors) Early History of Cosmic Ray Studies. Personal Reminiscences with Old Photographs (Reidel, Dordrecht) 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rossi B. “Arcetri, 1928-1932”, in Early History of Cosmic Ray Studies. Personal Reminiscences with Old Photographs, edited by Sekido Y. and Elliot H. (Reidel, Dordrecht) 1985, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bothe W. W. G. and Kolhörster W. “Das Wesen der Höhenstrahlung”, Zeitschrift für Physik 56 (1929) 751–777. Bothe W. W. G. and Kolhörster W., “Die Natur der Höhenstrahlung”, Die Naturwissenschaften 17 (1929) 271–273.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rossi B. B. “Method of Registering Multiple Simultaneous Impulses of Several Geiger’s Counters”, Nature 125 (1930) 636.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Occhialini G. P. S. “Uno spettrografo magnetico per raggi \(\beta \) emessi da sostanze debolmente radioattive”, Rendiconti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei 14 (1931) 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hendry J. (Editor), Cambridge Physics in the Thirties (Adam Hilger Ltd, Bristol) 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Blackett P. M. S. “The Old Days of the Cavendish”, Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, Special Issue, 1 (1969) xxxii–xxxix.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Oliphant M. Rutherford. Recollections of the Cambridge Days (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Galison P. Image and Logic. A Material Culture of Microphysics (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bustamante M. C. “Blackett’s Experimental Researches on the Energy of Cosmic Rays”, Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences 47, No. 138 (1997) 108–141.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Blackett P. M. S. “On the Technique of the Counter Controlled Cloud Chamber”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 146 (1934) 281–299.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lovell B. “Patrick Maynard Stuart Blackett, Baron Blackett, of Chelsea”, Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society of London 21 (1975) 1–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nye M. J. Blackett. Physics, War and Politics in the Twentieth Century (Harvard University Press, Cambridge) 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Occhialini G. P. S. contribution to the “Memorial Meeting for Lord Blackett, O.M., C.H., F.R.S. at the Royal Society on 31 October 1974”, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 29 (1975) 144–146.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Blackett P. M. S. and Occhialini G. P. S. “Photography of Penetrating Corpuscular Radiation”, Nature 130 (1932) 363.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson T. H., Fleisher W. Jr. and Street J. C. “A Cloud Expansion Chamber for Automatically Photographing the Tracks of Corpuscular Cosmic Rays”, The Physical Review 40 (1932) 1048.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Blackett P. M. S. and Occhialini G. P. S. “Some Photographs of the Tracks of Penetrating Radiation”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Ser. A 139 (1933) 699–727.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hanson N. R. The Concept of the Positron (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) 1963; “Discovering the Positron”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12, No. 47 (1961) 194–214, 12, No. 48 (1962) 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  38. De Maria M. and Russo A. “The Discovery of the Positron”, Rivista di Storia della Scienza 2 (1985) 237–286.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Roqué X. “The Manufacture of the Positron”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (1997) 73–129.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Blackett P. M. S. “Cloud Chamber Researches in Nuclear Physics and Cosmic Radiation. Nobel Lecture, December 13, 1948” in Nobel Lecture, Physics 1942–1962 (Elsevier, New York) 1964, pp. 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Passos Videira A. A. and Bustamante M. C. “Gleb Wataghin en la Universidad de São Paulo: un momento culminante de la ciencia brasileña”, Quipu 10, No. 3 (1993) 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schwartzman S. “Struggling to be Born: The Scientific Community in Brazil”, Minerva 16 (1978) 545–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Schwartzman S. “Science and Higher Education in Brazil: an Historical View”, Woodrow Wilson International Center of Scholars, Latin American Program, Working Papers 8 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  44. De Souza Santos M. D. “Os precursores da física no Brasil” in Centros e Museus de Ciência visões e experiências edited by Crestana S., Goldman De Castro M., and Pereira G. (Saraiva, São Paulo) 1998, pp. 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bustamante M. C. and Videira A. A. P. “Bernhard Gross y la física de los rayos cósmicos en el Brasil”, Quipu 8 (1991) 325–347.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mascarenhas S. “Bernhard Gross and his Contribution to Physics in Brazil”, Brazilian Journal of Physics 29 (1999) 217–219.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Schober J. and Belisário R. “Marcelo Damy de Souza Santos”, Ciência e Cultura 55 (2003) 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hamburger A. I. “Mario Schenberg (1914-1990)” in Cientistas do Brasil - Depoimentos (Sociedade Brasileira par o Progresso da Ciência, São Paulo) 1998, pp. 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Franken T. and Costa C. “Entrevista com o Professor Mario ù Schenberg” (FGV/CPDOC-Historia Oral, Rio de Janeiro) 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nussenzveig M. et al., “Cesar Lattes. Modéstia, ciência e sabedoria”, Ciência hoje 19 (1995) 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Caruso F., Marques A. and Troper A. (Editors), Cesar Lattes, a descoberta do méson\(\pi \)e outras histórias (CBPF - MCT, Rio de Janeiro) 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bellandi J. and Pemmaraju A. (Editors), Topics on Cosmic Rays.\(60^{th}\)anniversary of C. M. G. Lattes (Editora da Unicamp, Campinas) 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Mariani M. C. “O Instituto de Biofísica da UFRJ” in Universidades e Instituições Científicas no Rio de Janeiro edited by Schwartzman S. (CNPq, Brasília) 1982, pp. 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tyndall A. M. A History of the Department of Physics in Bristol. 1876-1948. With Personal Reminiscences (1956) in Histories of Physics in Bristol edited by Chambers R. G. and Hart M., 2005: http://www.phy.bris.ac.uk/history.html.

  55. Lock W. O. “Origins and Early Days of the Bristol School of Cosmic-Ray Physics”, European Journal of Physics 11 (1990) 193–202.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Foster B. and Fowler P. H. (Editors), Forty Years of Particles Physics. Proceedings of the International Conference to Celebrate the\(40^{th}\)Anniversary of the Discoveries of the\(\pi \)- and V-Particles, held at the University of Bristol, 22–24 July 1987 (Adam Hilger, Bristol) 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ribeiro De Andrade A. M. “The Socio-Historical Construction of \(\pi \)-Meson” (Museo de Astronomia e Ciências Afins, Rio de Janeiro) 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ribeiro De Andrade A. M. Físicos, Mésons e Política: a dinâmica da ciência na sociedade (Hucitec/MAST, São Paulo) 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Brown L. M. and Hoddeson L. (Editors), The Birth of Particles Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Powell C. F. “Fragments of Autobiography” in Selected Papers of Cecil Frank Powell edited by Burhop E. H. S., Lock W. O. and Menon M. G. K. (North Holland, Amsterdam) 1972, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Frank F. C. and Perkins D. H. “Powell, Cecil Frank”, Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 17 (1971) 541–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Powell C. F., Occhialini G. P. S., Livesey D. L. and Chilton L. V. “A New Photographic Emulsion for the Detection of Fast Charged Particles”, Journal of Scientific Instruments 23 (1946) 102–106.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lattes C. G. M., Muirhead H., Occhialini G. P. S. and Powell C. F. “Processes Involving Charged Mesons”, Nature 159 (1947) 694–697.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. Burch C. R. “Reflecting Microscope”, Proceedings of the Physical Society 59 (1947) 41–46.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. Bates W. J. and Occhialini G. P. S. “Applications of the Reflecting Microscope to the Nuclear Plates Technique”, Nature 161 (1948) 473.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. Dilworth C. C., Occhialini G. P. S. and Payne R. M. “Processing Thick Emulsions for Nuclear Research”, Nature 162 (1948) 102–103.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. Dilworth C. C., Occhialini G. P. S. and Vermaesen L. “On Processing Nuclear Emulsions. Part 1. Concerning Temperature Development”, Bulletin du Centre de Physique Nucléaire de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles 13a (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bonetti A., Dilworth C. C. and Occhialini G. P. S. “On Processing Nuclear Emulsions. Part II. After Development Techniques”, Bulletin du Centre de Physique Nucléaire de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles 13b (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Wolfendale A. W. “History of British Contributions to the Astrophysical Aspects of Cosmic Rays and Gamma Rays since the Second World War”, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 29 (1988) 27–37.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. Powell C. F. The Cosmic Radiation. Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1950 in Nobel Lectures, Physics 1942-1962 (Elsevier, New York) 1964, pp. 144–157.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Amaldi E. “Gli anni della ricostruzione”, Giornale di Fisica 20 (1979) 186–225.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Gariboldi L. “Constance Charlotte Dilworth”, Il Nuovo Saggiatore 20, No. 3-4 (2004) 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Gariboldi L. “A Note in Memory of Constance Charlotte Dilworth Occhialini”, Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira da Física 4 (2004) 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Belloni L. and Dilworth C. C. “From Little to Big. A Story of a European Postwar Collaboration with Nuclear Emulsions” in The Restructuring of Physical Sciences in Europe and the United States 1945-1960 edited by De Maria M., Grilli M., and Sebastiani F. (World Scientific, Singapore) 1989, pp. 732–744.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Meulemans G., Occhialini G. P. S. and Vincent A. M. “The Wire Method of Loading Nuclear Emulsions”, Il Nuovo Cimento 8 (1951) 341–344.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. Bonetti A. and Occhialini G. P. S. “Cylindrical Emulsions”, Il Nuovo Cimento 8 (1951) 725–727.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. Dilworth C. C., Occhialini G. P. S. and Samuel E. “Eclaircissement des plaques photographiques nucléaires”, Bulletin du Centre de Physique Nucléaire de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles 2 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Tagliaferri G. “Le scienze esatte all’Università di Milano” in Storia di Milano, vol. 18 (Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, Roma) 1995, pp. 659–677.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Belloni L. “Giovanni Polvani e l’Istituto di Milano”, Il Nuovo Saggiatore 4, No. 3 (1988) 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Tagliaferri G. “Post War Restarting of Cosmic Ray Research at Milan University” in The Restructuring of Physical Sciences in Europe and the United States 1945-1960 edited by De Maria M., Grilli M. and Sebastiani F. (World Scientific, Singapore) 1989, pp. 716–731.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Baldo Ceolin M. “The Discreet Charm of the Nuclear Emulsion Era”, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Sciences 52 (2001) 1–21.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. Davies J. H. et al., “On the Masses and Modes of Decay of Heavy Mesons Produced by Cosmic Radiation”, Il Nuovo Cimento 2 (1955) 1065-1102.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. Davies J. H. et al., “Observations on Heavy Mesons Secondaries”, Suppl. Nuovo Cimento, 6, Ser. X, No. 2 (1956) 398–424.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Bhomwik B. et al., “The Interaction and Decay of K\(^{-}\) Mesons in Photographic Emulsion. Part I. General Characteristics of K\(^{-}\)-Interactions and Analysis of Events in which a Charged \(\pi \)-Meson is Emitted”, Il Nuovo Cimento 13 (1959) 690–729.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  85. Bhomwik B. et al., “The Interaction and Decay of K\(^{-}\) Mesons in Photographic Emulsion Nuclei. Part II. The Emission of Hyperons from K\(^{-}\) at Rest”, Il Nuovo Cimento 14 (1959) 315–364.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. Evans D. et al., “The Interaction and Decay of K\(^{-}\) Mesons in Photographic Emulsion. Part III”, Il Nuovo Cimento 15 (1960) 873–898.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  87. Krige J. and Russo A. A History of the European Space Agency 1958–1987. Volume I. The Story of ESRO and ELDO 1958–1973 (ESA Publications Division, Dordrecht) 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Krige J., Russo A. and Sebesta L. A History of the European Space Agency 1958–1987. Volume II. The Story of ESA 1973–1987 (ESA Publications Division, Dordrecht) 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Pinkau K. “The Early Days of Gamma-Ray Astronomy”, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series 120 (1996) 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo Gariboldi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gariboldi, L., Tucci, P. (2024). Giuseppe Paolo Stanislao Occhialini (1907–1993) A Short Biography. In: Gariboldi, L., Gervasi, M., Sironi, G., Treves, A., Tucci, P. (eds) The Scientific Legacy of Beppo Occhialini. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37034-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics