Skip to main content

FaaSOnto: A Semantic Model for Enabling Function-as-a-Service Platform Selection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD 2023)

Abstract

Serverless computing shifts the responsibilities of provisioning and managing cloud infrastructure resources from developers to cloud service providers, allowing developers to focus solely on their applications. Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) is a serverless computing approach that enables developers to develop their applications as event-driven functions. There are many FaaS platforms available through public cloud providers or open-source distributions. Understanding the differences in these platforms and keeping up to date with their latest developments is challenging. Hence, it is necessary to systematically model the information about FaaS Platforms to allow practitioners to select the platform most suited for realizing their use cases. This paper presents the FaaSOnto ontology, a semantic model that represents the characteristics of FaaS platforms. We developed the ontology systematically following the NeOn methodology. We fully implemented the ontology using OWL2 and created a knowledge base with information about ten different FaaS platforms. The knowledge base is semi-automatically populated. On top of the knowledge base, we developed a minimal decision support system to enable the sorting and filtering of FaaS platforms based on their characteristics to facilitate an interactive platform selection process.

S. van Geene and I. Kumara—Contributed equally to this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Ontology:DOLCE+DnS_Ultralite.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/IndikaKuma/FaaSOnto.

  3. 3.

    https://protege.stanford.edu/.

References

  1. Castro, P., Ishakian, V., Muthusamy, V., Slominski, A.: The rise of serverless computing. Commun. ACM 62(12), 44–54 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Foundation, C.N.C.: CNCF Annual Survey 2021 (2021). https://www.cncf.io/reports/cncf-annual-survey-2021/. Accessed 22 May 2022

  3. Yussupov, V., Soldani, J., Breitenbücher, U., Brogi, A., Leymann, F.: FaaSten your decisions: a classiffication framework and technology review of function-asa- Service platforms. J. Syst. Softw. 175, 110906 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Copik, M., Kwasniewski, G., Besta, M., Podstawski, M., Hoeer, T.: SEBS: a serverless benchmark suite for function-as-a-service computing. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Middleware Conference, pp. 64–78 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wen, J., Liu, Y., Chen, Z., Chen, J., Ma, Y.: Characterizing commodity serverless computing platforms. J. Softw. Evol. Process n/a(n/a), 2394 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Suárez-Figueroa, Mari Carmen, Gómez-Pérez, Asunción, Fernández-López, Mariano: The neon methodology for ontology Engineering. In: Suárez-Figueroa, Mari Carmen, Gómez-Pérez, Asunción, Motta, Enrico, Gangemi, Aldo (eds.) Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, pp. 9–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Gangemi, Aldo, Presutti, Valentina: Ontology design patterns. In: Staab, Steffen, Studer, Rudi (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. IHIS, pp. 221–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gangemi, A., Mika, P.: Understanding the semantic web through descriptions and situations. In: OTM Confederated International Conferences on the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, pp. 689–706. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Poveda-Villalón, M., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Validating ontologies with oops! In: Teije, A., et al. (eds.) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, pp. 267–281. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Bassiliades, N., Symeonidis, M., Gouvas, P., Kontopoulos, E., Meditskos, G., Vlahavas, I.: PaaSport semantic model: an ontology for a platform-as-a-service semantically interoperable marketplace. Data Knowl. Eng. 113, 81–115 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumara, I., et al.: The do’s and don’ts of infrastructure code: a systematic gray literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 137, 106593 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wen, J., et al.: An empirical study on challenges of application development in serverless computing. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 416–428. ACM, Athens Greece (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fawei, B., Pan, J.Z., Kollingbaum, M., Wyner, A.Z.: A semi-automated ontology construction for legal question answering. New Gen. Comput. 37(4), 453–478 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganapathy, D.N., Joshi, K.P.: A semantically rich framework to automate cloud service level agreements. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 16(1), 53–64 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moscato, F., Aversa, R., Di Martino, B., Fortiş, T.-F., Munteanu, V.: An analysis of mosaic ontology for cloud resources annotation. In: 2011 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp. 973–980 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kamateri, E., et al.: Cloud4SOA: a semantic-interoperability PaaS solution for multi-cloud platform management and portability. In: Lau, Kung-Kiu., Lamersdorf, Winfried, Pimentel, Ernesto (eds.) ESOCC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8135, pp. 64–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40651-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun, L., Ma, J., Zhang, Y., Dong, H., Hussain, F.K.: Cloud-FuSeR: fuzzy ontology and MCDM based cloud service selection. Future Gen. Comput. Syst. 57, 42–55 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Sayed, M.M., Hassan, H.A., Omara, F.A.: CloudFNF: an ontology structure for functional and non-functional features of cloud services. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 141, 143–173 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumara, I., et al.: Towards semantic detection of smells in cloud infrastructure code. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining And Semantics, pp. 63–67. ACM, Biarritz France (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Di Nitto, E., Gorroñogoitia Cruz, J., Kumara, I., Radolović, D., Tokmakov, K., Vasileiou, Z.: Deployment and Operation of Complex Software in Heterogeneous Execution Environments: The SODALITE Approach. Springer, Cham, Gewerbestrasse (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wong, W., Liu, W., Bennamoun, M.: Ontology learning from text: a look back and into the future. ACM Comput. Surv. 44(4) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Farshidi, S., Jansen, S., Jong, R., Brinkkemper, S.: A decision support system for cloud service provider selection problem in software producing organizations. In: 2018 IEEE 20th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), vol. 01, pp. 139–148 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Farshidi, S., Jansen, S., Espa na, S., Verkleij, J.: Decision support for blockchain platform selection: three industry case studies. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 67(4), 1109–1128 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Farshidi, S., Jansen, S., Jong, R., Brinkkemper, S.: A decision support system for software technology selection. J. Decis. Syst. 27(sup1), 98–110 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Farshidi, S., Jansen, S., Deldar, M.: A decision model for programming language ecosystem selection: Seven industry case studies. Inf. Softw. Technol. 139, 106640 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. DSDM Consortium, R., et al.: The DSDM agile project framework handbook. Ashford, Kent, UK: DSDM Consortium (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has received funding from the Dutch government under the SENTINEL project and the European Union’s Horizon research and innovation program under the grant agreement No 101097036 (ONCOSCREEN).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Indika Kumara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

van Geene, S., Kumara, I., Monsieur, G., Heuvel, WJ.v.D., Tamburri, D.A. (2023). FaaSOnto: A Semantic Model for Enabling Function-as-a-Service Platform Selection. In: Shishkov, B. (eds) Business Modeling and Software Design. BMSD 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 483. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36757-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36757-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36756-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36757-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics