Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1831))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Item Response Theory (IRT) is a well known method for assessing responses from humans in education and psychology. In education, IRT is used to infer student abilities and characteristics of test items from student responses. Interactions with students are expensive, calling for methods that efficiently gather information for inferring student abilities. Methods based on Optimal Experimental Design (OED) are computationally costly, making them inapplicable for interactive applications. In response, we propose incorporating amortised experimental design into IRT. Here, the computational cost is shifted to a precomputing phase by training a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agent with synthetic data. The agent is trained to select optimally informative test items for the distribution of students, and to conduct amortised inference conditioned on the experiment outcomes. During deployment the agent estimates parameters from data, and suggests the next test item for the student, in close to real-time, by taking into account the history of experiments and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blau, T., Bonilla, E.V., Chades, I., Dezfouli, A.: Optimizing sequential experimental design with deep reinforcement learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2107ā€“2128. PMLR (2022)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User modeling and user-adapted interaction 4(4), 253ā€“278 (1994)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Foster, A., Ivanova, D.R., Malik, I., Rainforth, T.: Deep adaptive design: Amortizing sequential bayesian experimental design. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 3384ā€“3395. PMLR (2021)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Ghosh, A., Lan, A.: Bobcat: Bilevel optimization-based computerized adaptive testing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07386 (2021)

  5. Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H.: Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1988-9

  6. Li, X., Xu, H., Zhang, J., Chang, H.H.: Deep reinforcement learning for adaptive learning systems. J. Educ. Behav. Statist. 10769986221129847 (2020)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. PaaƟen, B., Dywel, M., Fleckenstein, M., Pinkwart, N.: Sparse factor autoencoders for item response theory. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, p. 17 (2022)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Raffin, A., Hill, A., Gleave, A., Kanervisto, A., Ernestus, M., Dormann, N.: Stable-baselines3: Reliable reinforcement learning implementations. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 22(268), 1ā€“8 (2021). http://jmlr.org/papers/v22/20-1364.html

  9. Rainforth, T., Cornish, R., Yang, H., Warrington, A., Wood, F.: On nesting monte carlo estimators. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 4267ā€“4276. PMLR (2018)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Rasch, G.: Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. ERIC (1993)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Ryan, E.G., Drovandi, C.C., McGree, J.M., Pettitt, A.N.: A review of modern computational algorithms for Bayesian optimal design. Int. Statist. Rev. 84(1), 128ā€“154 (2016)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., Klimov, O.: Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 (2017)

  13. Smucker, B., Krzywinski, M., Altman, N.: Optimal experimental design. Nat. Methods 15(8), 559ā€“560 (2018)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Wu, M., Davis, R.L., Domingue, B.W., Piech, C., Goodman, N.: Variational item response theory: Fast, accurate, and expressive. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.00276 (2020)

  15. Yeung, C.K.: Deep-irt: Make deep learning based knowledge tracing explainable using item response theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.11738 (2019)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antti Keurulainen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Keurulainen, A., Westerlund, I., Keurulainen, O., Howes, A. (2023). Amortised Design Optimization forĀ Item Response Theory. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dimitrova, V., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky. AIED 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1831. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_56

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36335-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36336-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics