Abstract
Mind wandering (“zoning out”) is a frequent occurrence and is negatively related to learning outcomes, which suggests it would be beneficial to measure and mitigate it. To this end, we investigated whether movement from a wrist-worn accelerometer between tasks could predict mind wandering as 125 learners read long, connected, informative texts. We examined random forest models using both basic statistical and more novel nonlinear dynamics movement features, finding that the former were more predictive of future (i.e., about 5 min later) reports of mind wandering. Models generalized across students with AUROCS up to 0.62. Importantly, vertical movement as measured by the Z-axis accelerometer channel, e.g. flexion or extension of the elbow in stretching, was the most predictive signal, whereas horizontal arm movements (measured by X- and Y-axis channels) and rotational movement were not predictive. We discuss implications for theories of mind wandering and applications for intelligent learning interfaces that can prospectively detect mind wandering.
R. Southwell and C.E. Peacock—These authors contributed equally
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blasche, G., et al.: Comparison of rest-break interventions during a mentally demanding task. Stress. Health 34(5), 629–638 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2830
Bosch, N., D’Mello, S.K.: Can computers outperform humans in detecting user zone-outs? Implications for intelligent interfaces. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29, 2, 1–33 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3481889
Carriere, J.S.A., et al.: Wandering in both mind and body: individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 67(1), 19–31 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031438
Coco, M.I., Dale, R.: Cross-recurrence quantification analysis of categorical and continuous time series: an R package. Front. Psychol. 5 (2014)
D’Mello, S., et al.: Posture as a predictor of learner’s affective engagement. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 29, no. 29, p. 7, Merced, CA (2007)
D’Mello, S.K.: Giving eyesight to the blind: towards attention-aware AIED. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(2), 645–659 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0104-1
D’Mello, S.K., et al.: Machine-learned computational models can enhance the study of text and discourse: a case study using eye tracking to model reading comprehension. Discourse Process. 57(5–6), 420–440 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1739600
D’Mello, S.K., et al.: Zone out no more: mitigating mind wandering during computerized reading. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. International Educational Data Mining Society, Wuhan, China (2017)
D’Mello, S.K., Graesser, A.C.: Mining bodily patterns of affective experience during learning. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Data Mining (2010)
D’Mello, S.K., Mills, C.S.: Mind wandering during reading: an interdisciplinary and integrative review of psychological, computing, and intervention research and theory. Lang. Linguist. Compass. 15(4), e12412 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12412
Erdaş, Ç.B., et al.: Integrating features for accelerometer-based activity recognition. Proc. Comp. Sci. 98, 522–527 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.070
Faber, M., Bixler, R., D’Mello, S.K.: An automated behavioral measure of mind wandering during computerized reading. Behav. Res. Methods 50(1), 134–150 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0857-y
Faber, M., Mills, C., Kopp, K., D’Mello, S.: The effect of disfluency on mind wandering during text comprehension. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24(3), 914–919 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1153-z
Farley, J., et al.: Everyday attention and lecture retention: the effects of time, fidgeting, and mind wandering. Front. Psychol. 4, 619 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00619
Fenesi, B., et al.: Sweat so you don’t forget: exercise breaks during a university lecture increase on-task attention and learning. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 7(2), 261–269 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.01.012
Flesch, R.: A new readability yardstick. J. Appl. Psychol. 32(3), 221–233 (1948)
Forrin, N.D., Risko, E.F., Smilek, D.: On the relation between reading difficulty and mind-wandering: a section-length account. Psychol. Res. 83(3), 485–497 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0936-9
Fox, K.C.R., Christoff, K.: The Oxford Handbook of Spontaneous Thought: Mind-Wandering, Creativity, and Dreaming. Oxford University Press (2018)
Hutt, S., et al.: Automated gaze-based mind wandering detection during computerized learning in classrooms. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 29(4), 821–867 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-019-09228-5
Kopp, K., Bixler, R., D’Mello, S.: Identifying learning conditions that minimize mind wandering by modeling individual attributes. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 94–103. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_12
Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.-I.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc. (2017)
Mills, C., et al.: Eye-Mind reader: an intelligent reading interface that promotes long-term comprehension by detecting and responding to mind wandering. Hum.-Comp. Interact. 36(4), 306–332 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2020.1716762
Mooneyham, B.W., Schooler, J.W.: The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: a review. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 67(1), 11–18 (2013)
Mota, S., Picard, R.W.: Automated posture analysis for detecting learner’s interest level. In: 2003 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, p. 49 IEEE, Madison, Wisconsin, USA (2003)
Nakatani, C., et al.: Context-dependent neural effects predict mind wandering minutes in advance. http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.04.458977, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.04.458977
Ravi, N., et al.: Activity recognition from accelerometer data. In: American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 6 (2005)
Robin, X., et al.: pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 12(1), 77 (2011)
Seli, P., et al.: Restless mind, restless body. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 40(3), 660–668 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035260
Smallwood, J., Schooler, J.W.: The Science of Mind Wandering: Empirically Navigating the Stream of Consciousness. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66(1), 487–518 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331
Straczkiewicz, M., Glynn, N.W., Harezlak, J.: On placement, location and orientation of wrist-worn tri-axial accelerometers during free-living measurements. Sensors 19(9), 2095 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19092095
Szpunar, K.K., et al.: Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures. PNAS 110(16), 6313–6317 (2013)
Webber, C., Zbilut, J.: Recurrence quantification analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems. Tutorials in Contemporary Nonlinear Methods for the Behavioral Sciences (2005)
Wong, A.Y., et al.: Task-unrelated thought during educational activities: a meta-analysis of its occurrence and relationship with learning. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 71, 102098 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102098
Zhang, H., Jonides, J.: Pre-trial gaze stability predicts momentary slips of attention. https://psyarxiv.com/bv2uc/ (2021). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bv2uc
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: United States. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045221. Last accessed 14 Jan 2023
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Southwell, R., Peacock, C.E., D’Mello, S.K. (2023). Getting the Wiggles Out: Movement Between Tasks Predicts Future Mind Wandering During Learning Activities. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13916. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36271-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36272-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)