Skip to main content

The Role of Social Networks When Using Digital Health Interventions for Multimorbidity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management (HCII 2023)

Abstract

The use of a digital health intervention can be a valuable addition to the self-management journey of a person living with multiple chronic conditions (multimorbidity). However, digital technology is but one aspect of self-management. Different social actors, including formal and informal carers also contribute to various self-management efforts. This study investigated the role of social networks in the use of the digital health intervention ProACT, which was designed to support the self-management abilities of older people with multimorbidity (PwMs). Self-reports of social connection, using the Lubben Social Network Scale, and semi-structured interviews after up to one year of ProACT use were analyzed. Family, friends, healthcare professionals, and triage nurses were all found to be relevant actors in the social networks of PwMs. Several psychosocial mechanisms were identified through which different social relationships influenced PwMs’ adoption and use of ProACT, including social support, social influence, social engagement, and person-to-person contact. Future digital health interventions should consider these mechanisms for effective implementation of such technology among PwMs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://seuro2020.eu/

References

  1. Hallberg, I., Ranerup, A., Kjellgren, K.: Supporting the self-management of hypertension: Patients’ experiences of using a mobile phone-based system. J. Hum. Hypertens. 30, 141–146 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2015.37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nolte, E., McKee, M.: Caring for people with chronic conditions: An Introduction. In: Caring for people with chronic conditions: A health system perspective, pp. 1–14. Open University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doyle, J., et al.: A digital platform to support self-management of multiple chronic conditions (ProACT): Findings in relation to engagement during a one-year proof-of-concept trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 23(12), e22672 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2196/22672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alkawaldeh, M.Y., Jacelon, C.S., Choi, J.: Older adults’ experiences with a tablet-based self-management intervention for diabetes mellitus type II: A qualitative study. Geriatr. Nurs. 41(3), 305–312 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miyamoto, S., et al.: Empowering diabetes self-management through technology and nurse health coaching. Diabetes Educator 45(6), 586–595 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721719879421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park, S.K., Bang, C.H., Lee, S.H.: Evaluating the effect of a smartphone app-based self-management program for people with COPD: A randomized controlled trial. Appl. Nurs. Res. 52, 151231 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallant, M.P.: The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: A review and directions for research. Health Educ. Behav. 30(2), 170–195 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198102251030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heumann, M., Röhnsch, G., Hämel, K.: Primary healthcare nurses’ involvement in patient and community participation in the context of chronic diseases: An integrative review. J. Adv. Nurs. 78(1), 26–47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. Active ageing: a policy framework. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/67215. Accessed 06 Feb 2023

  10. Koetsenruijter, J., et al.: Social support systems as determinants of self-management and quality of life of people with diabetes across Europe: Study protocol for an observational study. Health Quality Life Outcomes 12(29) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-29

  11. Vassilev, I., et al.: Social networks, social capital and chronic illness self-management: A realist review. Chronic Illn. 7, 60–86 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395310383338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berkman, L.F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., Seeman, T.E.: From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc. Sci. 51(6), 843–857 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Valente, T.W.: Social Networks and Health Behavior. In: Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice, pp. 205–222 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gu, J., Yang, C., Zhang, K., Zhang, Q.: Mediating role of psychological capital in the relationship between social support and treatment burden among older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Geriatr. Nurs. 42(5), 1172–1177 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tran, V.-T., Barnes, C., Montori, V.M., Falissard, B., Ravaud, P.: Taxonomy of the burden of treatment: a multi-country web-based qualitative study of patients with chronic conditions. BMC Medicine 13(115) (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0356-x

  16. The Academy of Medical Sciences. Multimorbidity: a priority for global health research. https://acmedsci.ac.uk/file-download/82222577. Accessed 08 Feb 2023

  17. Kirakalaprathapan, A., Oremus, M.: Efficacy of telehealth in integrated chronic disease management for older, multimorbid adults with heart failure: A systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inf. 162, 104756 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McManus, R.J., et al.: Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 376(9736), 163–172 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60964-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Visser, L., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A.: Point-of-care testing for diabetes patients: investigating diabetes management by older adults. In: CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1645–1650. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581193

  20. Panagioti, M., et al.: Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv. Res. 14, 356 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Perl, S., et al.: Socio-economic effects and cost saving potential of remote patient monitoring (SAVE-HM trial). Int. J. Cardiol. 169(6), 402–407 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.10.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Danesi, G., Pralong, M., Panese, F., Burnand, B., Grossen, M.: Techno-social reconfigurations in diabetes (self-) care. Soc. Stud. Sci. 50(2), 198–220 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720903493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nunes, F., Verdezoto, N., Fitzpatrick, G., Kyng, M., Grönvall, E., Storni, C.: Self-care technologies in HCI: Trends, tensions, and opportunities. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22(6), 33:1–33:45 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2803173

  24. Taylor, A., Godden, D., Aitken, A., Colligan, J., Wilson, R.: Delivering group-based services to the home via the Internet: Maximising clinical and social benefits. In: 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops, pp. 384–388 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2011.246004

  25. Heaney, C.A., Israel, B.A.: Social networks and social support. In: Health Behavior and Health Education, pp. 189–210. John Wiley & Sons (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hwu, Y.-J., Yu, C.-C.: Exploring health behavior determinants for people with chronic illness using the constructs of planned behavior theory. J. Nurs. Res. 14(4), 261–270 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JNR.0000387585.27587.4e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gallant, M.P., Spitze, G.D., Prohaska, T.R.: Help or hindrance? How family and friends influence chronic illness self-management among older adults. Res. Aging 29(5), 375–409 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027507303169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Alqahtani, J., Alqahtani, I.: Self-care in the older adult population with chronic disease: Concept analysis. Heliyon 8(7), e09991 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lawless, M.T., Tieu, M., Feo, R., Kitson, A.L.: Theories of self-care and self-management of long-term conditions by community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-ethnography. Soc. Sci. Med. 287, 114393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, G., D’Arcy, C.: Physical activity and social support mediate the relationship between chronic diseases and positive mental health in a national sample of community-dwelling Canadians 65+: A structural equation analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 298, 142–150 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chu, W.-M., et al.: Effect of different types of social support on physical frailty development among community-dwelling older adults in Japan: Evidence from a 10-year population-based cohort study. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 108, 104928 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2023.104928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu, Y., et al.: Relationships among social support, self-efficacy, and patient activation in community-dwelling older adults living with coronary heart disease: A cross-sectional study. Geriatr. Nurs. 48, 139–144 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li, T., Zhang, Y.: Social network types and the health of older adults: Exploring reciprocal associations. Soc. Sci. Med. 130, 59–68 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Doyle, J., et al.: The role of phone-based triage nurses in supporting older adults with multimorbidity to digitally self-manage – Findings from the ProACT proof-of-concept study. Digit. Health 8, 20552076221131140 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221131140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McKinlay, E., et al.: Social networks of patients with multimorbidity: A qualitative study of patients’ and supporters’ views. J. Prim. Health Care 9(2), 153–161 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1071/HC16062

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6), 1360–1380 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rogers, A., Brooks, H., Vassilev, I., Kennedy, A., Blickem, C., Reeves, D.: Why less may be more: A mixed methods study of the work and relatedness of ‘weak ties’ in supporting long-term condition self-management. Implement. Sci. 9, 19 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tsai, A.C., Papachristos, A.V.: From social networks to health: Durkheim after the turn of the millennium. Soc. Sci. Med. 125, 1–7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Vassilev, I., Rogers, A., Kennedy, A., Koetsenruijter, J.: The influence of social networks on self-management support: A metasynthesis. BMC Publ. Health 14, 719 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Friis, K., Lasgaard, M., Pedersen, M.H., Duncan, P., Maindal, H.T.: Health literacy, multimorbidity, and patient-perceived treatment burden in individuals with cardiovascular disease. A Danish population-based study. Patient Educ. Counsel. 102(10), 1932–1938 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.013

  41. Dinsmore, J., et al.: A digital health platform for integrated and proactive patient-centered multimorbidity self-management and care (ProACT): Protocol for an action research proof-of-concept trial. JMIR Res. Protocols 10(12), e22125 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2196/22125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fiori, K.L., Smith, J., Antonucci, T.C.: Social network types among older adults: A multidimensional approach. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 62(6), 322–330 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.6.P322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lubben, J.E.: Assessing social networks among elderly populations. Fam. Commun. Health 11(3), 42–52 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Versions of the LSNS. https://www.bc.edu/content/bc-web/schools/ssw/sites/lubben/description/versions-of-the-lsns.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2023

  45. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lubben, J., et al.: Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben social network scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist 46(4), 503–513 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.4.503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Weck, M., Afanassieva, M.: Toward the adoption of digital assistive technology: Factors affecting older people’s initial trust formation. Telecommun. Policy 102483 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102483

  48. Tripp-Reimer, T., et al.: An integrated model of multimorbidity and symptom science. Nurs. Outlook 68(4), 430–439 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2020.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ell, K.: Social networks, social support and coping with serious illness: The family connection. Soc. Sci. Med. 42(2), 173–183 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00100-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wu, F., Sheng, Y.: Social support network, social support, self-efficacy, health-promoting behavior and healthy aging among older adults: A pathway analysis. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 85, 103934 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2019.103934

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ProACT project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement no. 689996. The SEURO project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement no. 945449. We would like to thank all participants of this research for their valuable time.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Polak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Polak, S., van Leeuwen, C., Sillevis Smitt, M., Doyle, J., Cullen-Smith, S., Jacobs, A. (2023). The Role of Social Networks When Using Digital Health Interventions for Multimorbidity. In: Duffy, V.G. (eds) Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14029. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35748-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35748-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35747-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35748-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics