Abstract
Lacking situation awareness is one of the main issues in emergency dispatching that can lead to high uncertainty in decision-making. Automated systems can and will support dispatchers in this process in the future. Yet, the introduction of such systems can place additional cognitive demands on dispatchers and should therefore be tailored to their working routines at an early stage. This is especially true when systems execute tasks that cannot be performed by humans in this form, and thus provide new sources of information. To figure out how to design the integration of new information, it is essential to understand the existing information flow of dispatchers to assess how information processing might change. For this purpose, we propose the combination of simulations and the Critical Decision Method (CDM) with the amplification by psychological experimental design methods as an approach to uncover cognitive processes in decision-making. In a literature review, we identified 10 relevant empirical research papers in which this combination had already been applied in studies. The reviewed papers were analyzed in terms of methodological aspects and takeaways regarding the application of simulations and the CDM. The results show that both the simulation environment and scenarios, as well as the selection of CDM probes, require careful consideration and accurate alignment with the research objectives. In conclusion, we provide and discuss the methodological design, an experimental setup, and an example scenario focused on the emergency dispatching process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Artman, H., Wærn, Y.: Distributed cognition in an emergency co-ordination center. Cogn. Technol. Work 1(4), 237–246 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s101110050020
Blandford, A., Wong, W.: Situation awareness in emergency medical dispatch. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 61(4), 421–452 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.012
Krems, J.F., Baumann, M.R.K.: Driving and situation awareness: a cognitive model of memory-update processes. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) Human Centered Design. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 986–994. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_113
Mosier, K.L., Manzey, D.: Humans and automated decision aids: a match made in heaven? In: Mouloua, M., Hancock, P.A., and Ferraro, J. (eds.) Human Performance in Automated and Autonomous Systems. pp. 19–42. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, 2019. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429458330-2
Onnasch, L., Wickens, C.D., Li, H., Manzey, D.: Human performance consequences of stages and levels of automation: an integrated meta-analysis. Hum. Factors 56(3), 476–488 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813501549
Dousai, N.M.K., Loncaric, S.: Detection of humans in drone images for search and rescue operations. In: 2021 3rd Asia Pacific Information Technology Conference. pp. 69–75. ACM, Bangkok, Thailand (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3449365.3449377
Zicari, R.V., Brusseau, J., Blomberg, S.N., Christensen, H.C., Coffee, M., Ganapini, M.B., et al.: On assessing trustworthy AI in healthcare. Machine learning as a supportive tool to recognize cardiac arrest in emergency calls. Front. Human Dyn. 3, 673104 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2021.673104
Melcher, V., Diederichs, F., Maestre, R., Hofmann, C., Nacenta, J.-M., van Gent, J., et al.: Smart vital signs and accident monitoring system for motorcyclists embedded in helmets and garments for advanced eCall emergency assistance and health analysis monitoring. Proc. Manuf. 3, 3208–3213 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.871
Crandall, B.W., Klein, G.A., Hoffman, R.R.: Working Minds: A Practitioner’s Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2006). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7304.001.0001
Klein, G.A., Calderwood, R., MacGregor, D.: Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 19(3), 462–472 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1109/21.31053
Militello, L.G., Klein, G.: Decision-centered design. In: Lee, J.D., Kirlik, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Engineering, pp. 261–271. Oxford University Press, New York, NY (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199757183.013.0016
Crandall, B.W.: A comparative study of think-aloud and critical decision knowledge elicitation methods. ACM SIGART Bull. 144–146 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1145/63266.63288
Hoffman, R.R., Crandall, B., Shadbolt, N.: Use of the critical decision method to elicit expert knowledge: a case study in the methodology of cognitive task analysis. Hum. Factors 40(2), 254–276 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872098779480442
Von Thaden, T.L., Wiegmann, D.A.: Improving incident reports using a schematic recall aid: the critical event reporting tool (CERT). In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 82–86. SAGE Publications (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120104500218
Thurman, R.A.: Instructional simulation from a cognitive psychology viewpoint. ETR&D. 41, 75–89 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297513
Militello, L.G., Hutton, R.J.B.: Applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA): a practitioner’s toolkit for understanding cognitive task demands. Ergonomics 41(11), 1618–1641 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/001401398186108
Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., et al.: The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int. J. Surg. 88, 105906 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
Elliott, T., Welsh, M., Nettelbeck, T., Mills, V.: Investigating naturalistic decision making in a simulated microworld: what questions should we ask? Behav. Res. Methods 39(4), 901–910 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192985
Malakis, S., Kontogiannis, T., Psaros, P.: Monitoring and evaluating failure-sensitive strategies in Air Traffic Control simulator training. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2674396.2674462
Mansikka, H., Virtanen, K., Uggeldahl, V., Harris, D.: Team situation awareness accuracy measurement technique for simulated air combat - curvilinear relationship between awareness and performance. Appl. Ergon. 96 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103473
Roose, K.M., Veinott, E.S., Mueller, S.T.: The tracer method: the dynamic duo combining cognitive task analysis and eye tracking. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts, pp. 585–593. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3271522
Roose, K.M., Veinott, E.S.: Understanding game roles and strategy using a mixed methods approach. In: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, pp. 1–5. ACM, Virtual Event Germany (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3448018.3458006
Rozzi, S., Amaldi, P., Wong, W., Field, B.: Operational potential for 3D displays in air traffic control. In: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics Invent! Explore! - ECCE 2007. pp. 179–184. ACM Press (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1362550.1362586
Salmon, P.M., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H., Jenkins, D., Ladva, D., Rafferty, L., et al.: Measuring situation awareness in complex systems: comparison of measures study. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 39(3), 490–500 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.010
Stelmaszewska, H., Wong, B.L.W., Bhimani, N., Barn, B.: User behaviour: searching for scholarly material using electronic resource discovery systems. In: Electronic Workshops in Computing, pp. 17–26. BCS Learning & Development (2010). https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2010.5
Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Jenkins, D.P., Rafferty, L., Ladva, D.: Same or different? Generalising from novices to experts in military command and control studies. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40(5), 473–483 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2010.04.003
Endsley, M.R.: Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In: Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, pp. 789–795. IEEE, Dayton, OH (1988). https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1988.195097
Taylor, R.M.: Situational awareness rating technique (SART): the development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In: Salas, E. (ed.) Situational Awareness, pp. 111–128. Routledge, London (2017). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315087924-8
Lipshitz, R., Klein, G., Orasanu, J., Salas, E.: Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 14, 331–352 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.381
Cooke, N.J.: Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 41(6), 801–849 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1083
Acknowledgment
This work was motivated by scenarios investigated as part of the 5G-TELK-NF project funded by the German Federal Ministry for Digital and Transport (Grant number: 165GU135M). For their support, we would like to thank the team at the Emergency Control Center (Leitstelle Nord) in Harrislee, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gruner, M., Schrills, T., Franke, T. (2023). Pre-defined Emergencies on Demand: Simulation-Based Analysis of Information Processing in Emergency Dispatching. In: Duffy, V.G. (eds) Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14028. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35741-1_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35741-1_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35740-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35741-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)