Skip to main content
  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

Susan Embretson is professor of quantitative psychology at the Georgia Institute of Technology and was president of the Psychometric Society in 1998. Embretson wrote her dissertation at the University of Minnesota in 1973 under Renee Dawis’ supervision. Her research interests include item response models, validity, and the cognitive basis of item responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill.

  2. 2.

    Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179–197.

  3. 3.

    Embretson, S. E. (2016). Understanding examinees’ responses to items: Implications for measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 35, 6–22.

    Embretson, S. E. (2007). Construct validity: A universal validity system or just another test evaluation procedure? Educational Researcher, 36, 449–455.

  4. 4.

    Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  5. 5.

    Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item reponse theory: Principles and Applications. Kluwer Nijhoff.

  6. 6.

    Embretson, S. E. (1999). Generating items during testing: Psychometric issues and models. Psychometrika, 64, 407–433.

  7. 7.

    Embretson, S. E. (2016). Understanding examinees’ responses to items: Implications for measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 35, 6–22.

  8. 8.

    aroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.

  9. 9.

    Anastasi, A. (1937). Differential psychology. New York: Macmillan.

    Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

  10. 10.

    Embretson, S. E. (1984). A general latent trait model for resonse processes. Psychometrika, 2, 175–186.

  11. 11.

    Fischer, G. H. (1973). The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 37, 359–374.

  12. 12.

    Rodgers, J. L. (2010). The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: A quite methodological revolution. American Psychologist, 65, 1–12.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wijsen, L.D. (2023). Susan Embretson. In: Twenty Interviews With Psychometric Society Presidents. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34858-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics