Abstract
Verbal and non-verbal interpersonal interactions, if quantified, can be important factors for analyzing the performance of globalized team members. While using a survey is a common way to measure the interpersonal interactions, behavioral observation is a method that can effectively save time and avoid individual bias in interpretation. This between-subjects experiment collected data from 101 participants in a face-to-face (F2F), video conference (VC), and virtual reality (VR) training communication between the participant and a confederate trainer. The study explored whether the three conditions affected facial and interpersonal behavior differently. Secondly, the study examined whether future researchers could use the behavior markers to predict social and task variables. The dependent behavioral marker variables were Affirmation, Head Nod, Socializing, Question, Leaning Forward, Common Point of Reference, Mirroring, and Hand Gesture. Results showed that Affirmation and Question occurred significantly more often in F2F and VR than in VC. Participants also scored significantly higher in Head Nod in F2F than in VR and VC conditions, and VR socializing scores were also significantly higher than VC condition. Finally, correlation analysis showed that some self-report survey responses could possibly be replaced with behavioral observation methods. Future researchers who can automate the behavioral coding could thus use this approach rather than survey questions for those constructs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sellen, A., Buxton, B., Arnott, J.: Using spatial cues to improve videoconferencing. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’92. pp. 651–652. ACM Press, Monterey, California, United States (1992). https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.143070
Ranjan, A., Birnholtz, J.P., Balakrishnan, R.: An exploratory analysis of partner action and camera control in a video-mediated collaborative task. In: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 403–412 (2006)
Lee, K.M.: Presence, explicated. Commun. Theory. 14, 27–50 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
Lombard, M., Ditton, T.: At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 3 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
Tsetserukou, D., Neviarouskaya, A.: Emotion telepresence: emotion augmentation through affective haptics and visual stimuli. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 352, 012045 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/352/1/012045
Keynan, O., Brandel, N., Slakmon, B.: Students’ knowledge on emotion expression and recognition in computer-mediated communication: a comparative case study. Comput. Educ. 189, 104597 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104597
Kim, D., Frank, M.G., Kim, S.T.: Emotional display behavior in different forms of computer mediated communication. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 222–229 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.001
Schneider, S., Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G.D.: The impact of video lecturers’ nonverbal communication on learning–an experiment on gestures and facial expressions of pedagogical agents. Comput. Educ. 176, 104350 (2022)
Derks, D., Fischer, A.H., Bos, A.E.: The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: a review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 766–785 (2008)
Kafetsios, K., Chatzakou, D., Tsigilis, N., Vakali, A.: Experience of emotion in face to face and computer-mediated social interactions: an event sampling study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 76, 287–293 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.033
Culnan, M.J.: Information technologies. Handb. Organ. Commun.- Interdiscip. Perspect.-. (1987)
Rice, R.E., Love, G.: Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Commun. Res. 14, 85–108 (1987)
Walther, J.B., Burgoon, J.K.: Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Hum. Commun. Res. 19, 50–88 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00295.x
Walther, J.B., Anderson, J.F., Park, D.W.: Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Commun. Res. 21, 460–487 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021004002
Rozell, J., et al.: Circuit world: a multiplayer VE for researching engineering learning. In: 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW), p. 773. IEEE (2021)
Friard, O., Gamba, M.: BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1325–1330 (2016)
O’Brien, H.L., Toms, E.G.: The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61, 50–69 (2010)
Slater, M., Sadagic, A., Usoh, M., Schroeder, R.: Small-group behavior in a virtual and real environment: a comparative study. Presence. 9, 37–51 (2000)
Bernieri, F.J., Davis, J.M., Rosenthal, R., Knee, C.R.: Interactional synchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20, 303–311 (1994)
McAllister, D.J.: Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Manage. J. 38, 24–59 (1995)
Taylor, R.M.: Situational awareness rating technique (SART): the development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In: Situational Awareness, pp. 111–128. Routledge (2017)
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Advances in Psychology, pp. 139–183. Elsevier (1988)
Dunn, O.J.: Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6, 241–252 (1964)
Acknowledgments
This research has been partially supported by an award from the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), U.S. Department of Energy associated with Award Number DE-AR0001097.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sanaei, M., Machacek, M., Gilbert, S.B., Eubanks, C., Wu, P., Oliver, J. (2023). Behavioral Coding for Predicting Perceptions of Interactions in Dyads. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14040. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34411-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34411-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34410-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34411-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)