Abstract
For over five hundred years cotton has been woven into the economic and political fabric of global capitalism. Cotton cultivation has created immense wealth and despair. For centuries, its commercial cultivation depended on slavery and other forms of repressive labor systems coupled to government intervention to protect large producers and control prices. Cotton grew to be one of the world’s most important commodities before facing stiff competition by synthetic fibers in recent decades. Cotton remains a prominent global commodity grown by millions of farmers around the world, but its importance to the global political economy now stems from the politics of its production and marketing. This importance is underscored by the cotton dispute, and expressed through its emergence and resolution. This chapter explores the emergence of the trade dispute, how scholars have approached explanation of its sources and evolution, and describes the organization of the book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The WTO-DSB case (DS267) is often referred to by its short title US—Upland Cotton or DS267.
- 2.
ABRAPA’s official name in Portuguese is Associação Brasileira de Produtores de Algodão.
- 3.
Associação Brasileira dos Produtores de Algodão. A Saga Do Algodão—Das Primeiras Lavouras à Ação Na OMC. Edited by Sérgio Rodrigues Costa and Miguel Garcia Bueno. Rio de Janeiro, Insight Engenharia. 2004, 72. Translated from Portuguese to English by the author.
- 4.
Doha World Trade Organization Ministerial 2001: Ministerial Declaration. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1. 20 November 2001.
- 5.
The Office of the United States Trade Representative. “USTR Zoellick Says World Has Chosen Path of Hope, Openness, Development and Growth.” November 14, 2001.
- 6.
Mares and Trinkunas (2016) make an important distinction between reformist and revisionist global governance strategies in their book, arguing that “Reform is focused on the design of global governance institutions and the procedures under which the order is implemented; for example, gaining a permanent seat at the UN Security Council or influence in the multilateral institutions that design the guidelines by which international behavior is judged. Revision entails promoting reforms of the governance structures in conjunction with a revision of the foundational principles of the order (p. 6).”
References
Anderson, K., & Valenzuela, E. (2007). The world trade organization’s Doha cotton initiative: A tale of two issues. World Economy, 30(8), 1281–1304.
Associação Brasileira dos Produtores de Algodão (ABRAPA). (2004). In S. R. Costa & M. Garcia Bueno (Eds.), A Saga Do Algodão—Das Primeiras Lavouras à Ação Na OMC. Insight Engenharia.
Beckert, S. (2015). Empire of cotton: A global history. Alfred A Knopf.
Black, M. A. T. (2016). King cotton in international trade: The political economy of dispute resolution at the WTO. Brill.
Brewster, R., & Chilton, A. (2014). Supplying compliance: Why and when the United States complies with WTO rulings. Yale Journal of International Law, 39, 201.
Clarke, T. (2000). Taking on the WTO: Lessons from the battle of Seattle. Studies in Political Economy, 62(1), 7–16.
Dakouré, A. P. (2013). Cotton-4 and the cotton subsidies issue: A litmus test for the WTO’s benefits to least-developed countries. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 14(5), 852–888.
Estevadeordal, A., & Robertson, R. (2002). Do preferential trade agreements matter for trade? The FTAA and the pattern of trade. FTAA and Beyond: Prospects for Integration in the Americas. David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies. Harvard University Press.
Feinberg, R. E. (2003). The political economy of United States’ free trade arrangements. World Economy, 26(7), 1019–1040.
Guan, S. (2014). WTO retaliation rules in subsidy-related cases: What can we learn from the U.S upland cotton arbitration? Journal of World Trade, 48(4), 815–842.
Hanrahan, C., & Resources, Science, and Industry Division. (2004, January). The African cotton initiative and WTO agriculture negotiations. Congressional Information Service, Library of Congress.
Hopewell, K. (2016). Breaking the WTO: How emerging powers disrupted the neoliberal project. Stanford University Press.
Johnson, D. (1950). Trade and agriculture; A sudy of inconsistent policies. John Willey & Sons Inc.
Jurenas, R. (2002). Sugar policy issues. Congressional Research Service.
Langevin, M. S. (2006). Será que as laranjas e a cana-de-açúcar da Flórida azedam olivre comércio? uma análise de ratificação de nível II da política comercial dos Estados Unidos com o Brasil. Contexto Internacional, 28, 167–221.
Mahrenbach, L. (2013). The trade policy of emerging powers: Strategic choices of Brazil and India. Springer.
Mares, D. R., & Trinkunas, H. A. (2016). Aspirational power: Brazil on the long road to global influence. Brookings Institution Press.
Schropp, S. A. (2009). Trade policy flexibility and enforcement in the WTO: A law and economics analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Sek, L., & Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division. (2002, June). Trade promotion authority (Fast-track authority for trade agreements): Background and developments in the 107th congress. Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress.
Simões, A. J. F. (2002). A ALCA no limiar do século XXI: Brasil e EUA na negociaçao comercial hemisférica (Working Paper ITD-Documento de Trabajo ITD; 9) (Vol. 9). BID-INTAL.
Singh, J. P. (2017). Sweet talk: Paternalism and collective action in North-South trade relations. Stanford University Press.
Sneyd, A. (2011). Governing cotton: Globalization and poverty in Africa. Springer.
Sneyd, A. (2016). Cotton. John Wiley & Sons.
Souza Farias, R. (2010). Sowing the seeds of leadership: Brazil and the agricultural trade negotiations of the Uruguay round. Journal of World Trade, 44(3).
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. WW. Norton & Company.
Streck, C. (2004). New partnerships in global environmental policy: The clean development mechanism. The Journal of Environment & Development, 13(3), 295–322.
Sumner, Daniel A. (2006). Reducing cotton subsidies: The DDA cotton initiative. Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, 271–292.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Langevin, M.S. (2023). Introduction. In: The Political Economy of Brazil’s WTO Case Against the United States. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34264-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34264-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34263-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34264-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)