Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 46 Accesses

Abstract

For over five hundred years cotton has been woven into the economic and political fabric of global capitalism. Cotton cultivation has created immense wealth and despair. For centuries, its commercial cultivation depended on slavery and other forms of repressive labor systems coupled to government intervention to protect large producers and control prices. Cotton grew to be one of the world’s most important commodities before facing stiff competition by synthetic fibers in recent decades. Cotton remains a prominent global commodity grown by millions of farmers around the world, but its importance to the global political economy now stems from the politics of its production and marketing. This importance is underscored by the cotton dispute, and expressed through its emergence and resolution. This chapter explores the emergence of the trade dispute, how scholars have approached explanation of its sources and evolution, and describes the organization of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The WTO-DSB case (DS267) is often referred to by its short title US—Upland Cotton or DS267.

  2. 2.

    ABRAPA’s official name in Portuguese is Associação Brasileira de Produtores de Algodão.

  3. 3.

    Associação Brasileira dos Produtores de Algodão. A Saga Do Algodão—Das Primeiras Lavouras à Ação Na OMC. Edited by Sérgio Rodrigues Costa and Miguel Garcia Bueno. Rio de Janeiro, Insight Engenharia. 2004, 72. Translated from Portuguese to English by the author.

  4. 4.

    Doha World Trade Organization Ministerial 2001: Ministerial Declaration. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1. 20 November 2001.

  5. 5.

    The Office of the United States Trade Representative. “USTR Zoellick Says World Has Chosen Path of Hope, Openness, Development and Growth.” November 14, 2001.

  6. 6.

    Mares and Trinkunas (2016) make an important distinction between reformist and revisionist global governance strategies in their book, arguing that “Reform is focused on the design of global governance institutions and the procedures under which the order is implemented; for example, gaining a permanent seat at the UN Security Council or influence in the multilateral institutions that design the guidelines by which international behavior is judged. Revision entails promoting reforms of the governance structures in conjunction with a revision of the foundational principles of the order (p. 6).”

References

  • Anderson, K., & Valenzuela, E. (2007). The world trade organization’s Doha cotton initiative: A tale of two issues. World Economy, 30(8), 1281–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Associação Brasileira dos Produtores de Algodão (ABRAPA). (2004). In S. R. Costa & M. Garcia Bueno (Eds.), A Saga Do Algodão—Das Primeiras Lavouras à Ação Na OMC. Insight Engenharia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, S. (2015). Empire of cotton: A global history. Alfred A Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M. A. T. (2016). King cotton in international trade: The political economy of dispute resolution at the WTO. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, R., & Chilton, A. (2014). Supplying compliance: Why and when the United States complies with WTO rulings. Yale Journal of International Law, 39, 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T. (2000). Taking on the WTO: Lessons from the battle of Seattle. Studies in Political Economy, 62(1), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dakouré, A. P. (2013). Cotton-4 and the cotton subsidies issue: A litmus test for the WTO’s benefits to least-developed countries. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 14(5), 852–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estevadeordal, A., & Robertson, R. (2002). Do preferential trade agreements matter for trade? The FTAA and the pattern of trade. FTAA and Beyond: Prospects for Integration in the Americas. David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, R. E. (2003). The political economy of United States’ free trade arrangements. World Economy, 26(7), 1019–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, S. (2014). WTO retaliation rules in subsidy-related cases: What can we learn from the U.S upland cotton arbitration? Journal of World Trade, 48(4), 815–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan, C., & Resources, Science, and Industry Division. (2004, January). The African cotton initiative and WTO agriculture negotiations. Congressional Information Service, Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopewell, K. (2016). Breaking the WTO: How emerging powers disrupted the neoliberal project. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. (1950). Trade and agriculture; A sudy of inconsistent policies. John Willey & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurenas, R. (2002). Sugar policy issues. Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langevin, M. S. (2006). Será que as laranjas e a cana-de-açúcar da Flórida azedam olivre comércio? uma análise de ratificação de nível II da política comercial dos Estados Unidos com o Brasil. Contexto Internacional, 28, 167–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahrenbach, L. (2013). The trade policy of emerging powers: Strategic choices of Brazil and India. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mares, D. R., & Trinkunas, H. A. (2016). Aspirational power: Brazil on the long road to global influence. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schropp, S. A. (2009). Trade policy flexibility and enforcement in the WTO: A law and economics analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sek, L., & Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division. (2002, June). Trade promotion authority (Fast-track authority for trade agreements): Background and developments in the 107th congress. Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simões, A. J. F. (2002). A ALCA no limiar do século XXI: Brasil e EUA na negociaçao comercial hemisférica (Working Paper ITD-Documento de Trabajo ITD; 9) (Vol. 9). BID-INTAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. P. (2017). Sweet talk: Paternalism and collective action in North-South trade relations. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneyd, A. (2011). Governing cotton: Globalization and poverty in Africa. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sneyd, A. (2016). Cotton. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza Farias, R. (2010). Sowing the seeds of leadership: Brazil and the agricultural trade negotiations of the Uruguay round. Journal of World Trade, 44(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. WW. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streck, C. (2004). New partnerships in global environmental policy: The clean development mechanism. The Journal of Environment & Development, 13(3), 295–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, Daniel A. (2006). Reducing cotton subsidies: The DDA cotton initiative. Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, 271–292.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark S. Langevin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Langevin, M.S. (2023). Introduction. In: The Political Economy of Brazil’s WTO Case Against the United States. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34264-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics