Abstract
Causality is an ubiquitous but elusive concept describing the relationship between cause and effect. In the context of business processes, it defines ontological, i.e., existential, and temporal dependencies between activities. Modeling languages define types of constraints and dependencies between activities. However, they mainly focus on the representation of the business process and the activity execution order without addressing the nature and type of activity interrelationships, i.e., its ontological profile. This paper proposes a new way of understanding activity relations through the fundamental distinction between temporal and ontological dependencies. Ten general types of activity interrelationships are derived covering all possible relationships between two activities in loop-free processes. They can be used as an aid in process redesign tasks, compliance checking, and to compare and analyze existing modeling approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Note that the process term in this case does not refer to business processes. It is rather an action that continues constantly.
References
Adamo, G., Borgo, S., Di Francescomarino, C., Ghidini, C., Guarino, N., Sanfilippo, E.M.: Business process activity relationships: is there anything beyond arrows? In: Weske, M., Montali, M., Weber, I., vom Brocke, J. (eds.) BPM 2018. LNBIP, vol. 329, pp. 53–70. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98651-7_4
Adamo, G., Francescomarino, C.D., Ghidini, C., Maggi, F.M.: Beyond arrows in process models: a user study on activity dependences and their rationales. Inf. Syst. 100, 101762 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2021.101762
Arntzenius, F., Hitchcock, C., Rédei, M.: Reichenbach’s common cause principle. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2019 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2019)
Awad, A.: BPMN-Q: a language to query business processes. In: Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures - Concepts and Applications, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2007). LNI, Germany, vol. P-119, pp. 115–128. GI (2007)
Awad, A., Decker, G., Weske, M.: Efficient compliance checking using BPMN-Q and temporal logic. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85758-7_24
Baier, C., Katoen, J.: Principles of Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)
Caron, F., Vanthienen, J., Baesens, B.: Comprehensive rule-based compliance checking and risk management with process mining. Decis. Support Syst. 54(3), 1357–1369 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.012
Correia, F.: Ontological dependence. Philos Compass 3(5), 1013–1032 (2008)
Galton, A.: States, processes and events, and the ontology of causal relations. In: Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, FOIS 2012. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 239, pp. 279–292, Austria. IOS Press (2012). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-084-0-279
Halpern, J.Y.: Actual Causality. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)
Hildebrandt, T.T., Mukkamala, R.R.: Declarative event-based workflow as distributed dynamic condition response graphs. In: Proceedings Third Workshop on Programming Language Approaches to Concurrency and Communication-Centric Software, PLACES 2010. EPTCS, Cyprus, vol. 69, pp. 59–73 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.69.5
Kunze, M., Weske, M.: Behavioural Models - From Modelling Finite Automata to Analysing Business Processes. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44960-9
Lehmann, J., Borgo, S., Masolo, C., Gangemi, A.: Causality and causation in DOLCE. In: Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Proceedings of the International Conference FOIS, pp. 273–284 (2004)
Montali, M.: The ConDec language. In: Specification and Verification of Declarative Open Interaction Models. LNBIP, vol. 56, pp. 47–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14538-4_3
OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), version 2.0.2. Technical report, Object Management Group (2014). https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/PDF
Pearl, J., Mackenzie, D.: The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. Basic Books (2018)
Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A declarative approach for flexible business processes management. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11837862_18
Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H., Van der Aalst, W.M.: DECLARE: full support for loosely-structured processes. In: 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2007), pp. 287–287. IEEE (2007)
Ramezani, E., Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Where did i misbehave? Diagnostic information in compliance checking. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7481, pp. 262–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_21
Soffer, P.: A state-based intention driven declarative process model. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des. 4(2), 44–64 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4018/jismd.2013040103
Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical and Computational Foundations. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. (1999)
Weske, M.: Business Process Management - Concepts, Languages, Architectures, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59432-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Andree, K., Bano, D., Weske, M. (2023). Beyond Temporal Dependency: An Ontology-Based Approach to Modeling Causal Structures in Business Processes. In: van der Aa, H., Bork, D., Proper, H.A., Schmidt, R. (eds) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2023 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 479. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34241-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34241-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34240-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34241-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)