Skip to main content

Institutional Power and Resistance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Young Men, Masculinities and Imprisonment

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

  • 75 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores how masculinities are shaped by inter-prisoner and institutional power in the prison. It starts by examining the relationship between the young men and the institution, and how institutional power affected most elements of prisoners’ lives, resulting in feelings of vulnerability and powerlessness. The second section discusses the power dynamics between the prison staff and the young men, highlighting discrepancies in the implementation of the privilege scheme, favouritism, and how some young men were able to 'play the system'. The final section examines practices that the young men had adopted to resist institutional power. It shows how they practiced resistance collectively and individually in both the public and private domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The NIPS’s Progressive Regimes and Earned Privileges Scheme (PREPS), introduced in Hydebank in 2006. See Chapter 3 for a more detailed discussion on the physical organisation of Hydebank and the spatial arrangement of the enhancement regime.

  2. 2.

    Pseudonym.

  3. 3.

    During the Troubles, ‘politically affiliated prisoners’, who asserted that the acts for which they were charged had political motivations and were often committed in their capacity as a member of a paramilitary organisation (also see Scraton, 2015), were at first granted ‘special category status'. This meant that they were separated from ‘ordinary criminals’ and opposing paramilitary groups and allowed to wear their own clothes and associate freely. From 1976, ‘special category status' was revoked and politically affiliated prisoners were treated in the same manner as prisoners in the general population: they were required to wear prison uniforms and could not associate freely, etc. (McEvoy, 2001). Republican politically affiliated prisoners immediately campaigned for restoration of ‘special category status’. ‘Blanket protests’ (refusal to wear prison clothing) were followed by ‘no-wash’ or ‘dirty’ protests (during which prisoners smeared excrement around their cells), and culminated in hunger strikes. Margaret Thatcher’s unyielding Conservative Government would not accede to the Republican prisoners’ demands and in 1981 ten hunger strikers starved to death (Beresford, 1987; McKeown, 2001). These protests were acts of collective resistance against an institution that was formally responsible for prisoners’ health and safety.

  4. 4.

    In 1983, 38 politically affiliated Republican prisoners escaped from the Maze prison. This was the largest ever escape of prisoners from a prison under the control of the British state (McEvoy, 2001).

  5. 5.

    This is a credit system. Prisoners purchased a product and paid for it at a later date. If they missed payment, they were required to pay double the original purchase price (often called ‘double-bubble’).

  6. 6.

    Also known as a punched pocket, these are transparent plastic bags slit at the top and with a perforated edge, normally used to hold documents.

  7. 7.

    An extract from July’s field notes illustrates my own interaction with a mouse in the prison. ‘I was spending the day with the prisoners that were doing the industrial cleaning certificate. When we got back to the office some of the young men said they saw a mouse and had jumped on top of tables and chairs and were screaming and shouting. Upon seeing the young men screaming and jumping my instant reaction was to jump on top of the nearest chair in the office. They said the mouse had run under the table and into where all the cleaning products were kept. Fintan evidently was not scared of mice, he was laughing at us and began looking among the varying cleaning products for the mouse. He was pulling out bottle after bottle to no avail. Behind all the bottles, there was a pipe lying on the ground not attached to anything, Fintan said “I bet ya it’s in that”. At this point, myself and the other young men had got down from our safe spots and were crowded around the pipe. He moved it with his foot and nothing came out. Upon encouragement, he then picked it up to look inside it and shouted “aw fuck it’s in there” at the same time flicked the pipe towards where myself and the other young men were standing. A mouse came flying out of the top of the pipe, landed in front of us, and scurried through us and under a filing cabinet. Again, every single one of us jumped up onto chairs and tables screaming as the mouse disappeared’.

  8. 8.

    Obsessive compulsive disorder.

References

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism (2nd ed.). Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, D. (1987). Ten dead men: The story of the 1981 Irish hunger strike. Grafton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. (2016). Inmates control Northern Ireland jail, say staff as Hydebank attacks ‘go through the roof’. Belfast Telegraph. Retrieved from https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/inmates-control-northern-ireland-jail-say-staff-as-hydebank-attacks-go-through-the-roof/35285622.html

  • Bosworth, M. (1999). Agency and choice in women’s prisons: Toward a constitutive penology. In S. Henry & D. Milovanovic (Eds.), Constitutive criminology at work: Applications to crime and justice. State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M., & Carrabine, E. (2001). Reassessing resistance: Race, gender and sexuality in prison. Punishment & Society, 3(4), 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, M., & Maruna, S. (2012). Discipline and disparity: An independent report prepared for the Northern Ireland prison service. Queens University Belfast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesaroni, C., & Alvi, S. (2010). Masculinity and resistance in adolescent carceral settings. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 52(3), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemmer, D. (1940). The prison community. Christopher Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2005). Prisoner society in the era of hard drugs. Punishment & Society, 7(4), 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2007). Power, adaptation and resistance in a late-modern men’s prison. British Journal of Criminology, 47(2), 256–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2009). The prisoner society. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2011a). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment and Society, 13(5), 509–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2011b). Soft power in prison: Implications for staff–prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 455–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B., & Ievins, A. (2020). The prison as a reinventive institution. Theoretical Criminology, 24(4), 568–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CJINI. (2016). Report on an unannounced inspection of Hydebank Wood Secure College 9–19 May. CJINI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Harré, R. (2001). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader, 20, 261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2000). Lives of infamous men. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 III. The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012). When prisoners take over the prison: A social psychology of resistance. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 154–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubrin, C. E. (2005). Gangstas, thugs, and hustlas: Identity and the code of the street in rap music. Social Problems, 52(3), 360–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Independent Monitoring Board (IMB). (2017). Independent monitoring board annual report 2016–2017 Hydebank Wood College. Independent Monitoring Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Y. (2005). Men behind bars: “Doing” masculinity as an adaptation to imprisonment. Men and Masculinities, 8(1), 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, N. (2012). Doing harder time? The experiences of an ageing male prison population in England and Wales. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen, T. (1965). The defenses of the weak: A sociological study of a Norwegian Correctional Institution. Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, A. (2022). Hydebank Young Offenders Centre 'seven-hour riot' sees four men sentenced. Belfast Live. Retrieved from https://www.belfastlive.co.uk/news/belfast-news/hydebank-young-offenders-centre-seven-24711905

  • McEvoy, K. (2001). Paramilitary Imprisonment in Northern Ireland: Resistance, Management and Release. Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, K., McConnachie, K., & Jamieson, R. (2012). Political imprisonment and the ‘War on Terror’. In Y. Jewkes (Ed.), Handbook on prisons. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, L. (2001). Out of time: Irish Republican Prisoners, Long Kesh, 1970–2000. Beyond the Pale Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerschmidt, J. W. (2001). Masculinities, crime, and prison. In D. Sabo, T. A. Kupers, & W. London (Eds.), Prison Masculinities. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, N., Ingemar R., Robert, P., & Blum, R. (1973). Prisons. In R. Blum (Ed.), Drug dealers – Taking action. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hearn, D. (2009). Repression and solidary cultures of resistance: Irish political prisoners on protest. American Journal of Sociology, 115(2), 491–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. (2008). Negotiating identities: Ethnicity and social relations in a young offenders’ institution. Theoretical Criminology, 12(3), 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, A. (2016). ‘Tactics’, agency and power in women’s prisons. British Journal of Criminology, 56(2), 332–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scraton, P. (2015). Prisons and imprisonment in Northern Ireland. In A.-M. McAlinden, & C. Dwyer (Eds.), Criminal justice in transition: The Northern Ireland context. Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scraton, P., Sim, J., & Skidmore, P. (1991). Prisons under protest. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, J. A. (2016). Masculinities and the adult male prison experience. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. (2012). Criminals with ‘community spirit’: Practising citizenship in the hidden world of the prison. Space and Polity, 16(3), 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugelvik, T. (2011). The hidden food: Mealtime resistance and identity work in a Norwegian prison. Punishment & Society, 13(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugelvik, T. (2014). Power and resistance in prison: Doing time, doing freedom. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wahidin, A., & Tate, S. (2005). Prison (e)scapes and body tropes: Older women in the prison time machine. Body and Society, 11(2), 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. (2011). Review of the book Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity, by L. Wacquant. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 50, 546–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, L. J., & Tumim, S. (1991). Prison disturbances April 1990. HM Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conor Murray .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Murray, C. (2023). Institutional Power and Resistance. In: Young Men, Masculinities and Imprisonment. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33398-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33398-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33397-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33398-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics