Abstract
The last 30 years has seen the emergence of a self-styled ‘evolutionary’ paradigm within psychology (henceforth, EP). EP is often presented and critiqued as a distinctive, contentious paradigm, to be contrasted with other accounts of human psychology. However, little attention has been paid to the sense in which those other accounts are not also evolutionary. We outline the core commitments of canonical EP. These are, from least distinctive to most: mechanism, interactionism, functionalism, adaptationism, and functional specialization. We argue that the minimal requirement for an approach to psychology to qualify as evolutionary in an important sense is functionalism. This is because the notion of functional design in organismal structures presupposes a history of evolution by natural selection. On this criterion, we argue, most, perhaps all of psychology qualifies as evolutionary, either implicitly or explicitly. We review several approaches that are typically contrasted with EP, showing that these are all evolutionary too by our criteria. We suggest that the EP/non-EP dichotomy be retired. However, though all psychology is evolutionary, psychologists do not always need to foreground evolution in their research, just as is true for biologists. At the same time, more space for evolution does not mean any less space for environment, context, culture, meaning or agency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M. G., Wehbe, Y. S., & Buss, D. M. (2020). Context, environment and learning in evolution psychology. In Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6
Anderson, J. R. (1991). Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(3), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00070801
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.
Barrett, H. C. (2015). The shape of thought. Oxford University Press.
Bolhuis, J. J., Brown, G. R., Richardson, R. C., & Laland, K. N. (2011). Darwin in mind: New opportunities for evolutionary psychology. PLoS Biol, 9(7), e1001109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001109
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2009). Culture and the evolution of human cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1533), 3281–3288. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0134
Boyer, P. (2018). Minds make societies: How cognition explains the world humans create. Yale University Press.
Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53(5), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.5.533
Cabanac, M., Duclaux, R., & Spector, N. H. (1971). Sensory feedback in regulation of body weight: Is there a ponderostat? Nature, 229(5280), 125–127. https://doi.org/10.1038/229125a0
Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press.
Chater, N., Goodman, N., Griffiths, T. L., Kemp, C., Oaksford, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2011). The imaginary fundamentalists: The unshocking truth about Bayesian cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(4), 194–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000239
Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M. G., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65(2), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018413
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31(3), 187–276.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1987). From evolution to behavior: Evolutionary psychology as the missing link. In J. Dupré (Ed.), The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality (pp. 276–306). The MIT Press.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part II. Case study: A computational theory of social exchange. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 51–97.
Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2019). Is it good to cooperate? Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Current Anthropology, 60, 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/701478
Dickins, T. E., & Rahman, Q. (2012). The extended evolutionary synthesis and the role of soft inheritance in evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1740), 2913–2921. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0273
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/4444260
Eagly, A. H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 52, 1380–1383. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444390933.ch15
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458–476). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49
Fantino, M., Baigts, F., Cabanac, M., & Apfelbaum, M. (1983). Effects of an overfeeding regimen—The affective component of the sweet sensation. Appetite, 4(3), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(83)80028-2
Fiddick, L., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). No interpretation without representation: The role of domain-specific representations and inferences in the Wason selection task. Cognition, 77(1), 1–79.
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay in faculty psychology. MIT Press.
Freud, S. (2002). Civilization and its discontents. Penguin.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.
Glass, T. A., & Bilal, U. (2016). Are neighborhoods causal? Complications arising from the?Stickiness? Of ZNA. Social Science and Medicine, 166, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.001
Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2016). Pragmatic language interpretation as probabilistic inference. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(11), 818–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.005
Henrich, J. (2004). Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(03)00094-5
Henrich, J., & McElreath, R. (2003). The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.10110
Heyes, C. M. (2018). Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Harvard University Press.
Ho, M. K., Cushman, F., Littman, M. L., & Austerweil, J. L. (2019). People teach with rewards and punishments as communication, not reinforcements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(3), 520–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000569
Jacob, P., & Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2021). Is mindreading a gadget? Synthese, 199, 1–27.
Jones, M., & Love, B. C. (2011). Bayesian fundamentalism or enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(4), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10003134
Kokko, H., & Johnstone, R. A. (1999). Social queuing in animal societies: a dynamic model of reproductive skew. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266(1419), 571–578. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0674
Kurzban, R., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). Making Hay out of straw: Real and imagined controversies in evolutionary psychology. In J. H. Barkow (Ed.), Missing the revolution. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195130027.001.0001
Levy, N. (2004). Evolutionary psychology, human universals, and the standard social science model. Biology and Philosophy, 19(3), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIPH.0000036111.64561.63
Lewis, D. M. G., Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2017). Evolutionary psychology: A how-to guide. American Psychologist, 72(4), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040409
Lima, S. L. (1986). Predation risk and unpredictable feeding conditions: Determinants of body mass in birds. Ecology, 67(2), 377–385.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational approach. Freeman & Co.
McLaren, L. (2007). Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiologic Reviews, 29(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxm001
Nettle, D. (2018). Hanging on to the edges: Essays on science, society and the academic life. OpenBook Publishers.
Nettle, D., & Bateson, M. (2015). Adaptive developmental plasticity: What is it, how can we recognize it and when can it evolve? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1812), 20151005. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1005
Nettle, D., Andrews, C., & Bateson, M. (2017). Food insecurity as a driver of obesity in humans: The insurance hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e105–e105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000947
Pietraszewski, D., & Wertz, A. (2011). Reverse engineering the structure of cognitive mechanisms. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(August), 209–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000380
Pietraszewski, D., & Wertz, A. E. (2021). Why evolutionary psychology should abandon modularity. Perspectives on Psychological Science., 17, 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621997113
Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. Penguin.
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.
Schmitt, D. P., & International Sexuality Description Project. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.85
Shafto, P., Goodman, N. D., & Griffiths, T. L. (2014). A rational account of pedagogical reasoning: Teaching by, and learning from, examples. Cognitive Psychology, 71(June), 55–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.004
Smith, S. E. (2020). Is evolutionary psychology possible? Biological Theory, 15(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00336-4
Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131.
Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14, 29–56.
Sperber, D. (2005). Modularity and relevance: How can a massively modular mind by flexible and context-sensitive? In P. Caruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind. Structure and contents (pp. 53–68). Oxford University Press.
Sperber, D. (2006). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Blackwell.
Sperber, D., & Girotto, V. (2002). Use or misuse of the selection task? Rejoinder to Fiddick, Cosmides, and Tooby. Cognition, 85(3), 277–290.
Sperber, D., & Hirschfeld, L. (2007). Culture and modularity. The Innate Mind: Culture and Cognition, 2, 149–164.
Sperber, D., Cara, F., & Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57(1), 31–95.
Sterelny, K., & Griffiths, T. (1999). Sex and death: An introduction to the philosophy of biology. University of Chicago Press.
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011). How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science, 331(6022), 1279–1285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192788
Theriault, J. E., Young, L., & Barrett, L. F. (2021). The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure. Physics of Life Reviews, 36, 100–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2020.01.004
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–433.
Tooby, J. (2020). Evolutionary psychology as the crystalizing Core of a unified modern social science. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14(4), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000250
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part I. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10(1–3), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(89)90012-5
Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755
Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Aldine.
Vehrencamp, S. L. (1983). A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies. Animal Behaviour, 31(3), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80222-X
Wertz, A. E., & Moya, C. (2019). Pathways to cognitive design. Behavioural Processes, 161, 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.05.013
Zednik, C., & Jäkel, F. (2016). Bayesian reverse-engineering considered as a research strategy for cognitive science. Synthese, 193(12), 3951–3985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1180-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nettle, D., Scott-Phillips, T. (2023). Is a Non-evolutionary Psychology Possible?. In: du Crest, A., Valković, M., Ariew, A., Desmond, H., Huneman, P., Reydon, T.A.C. (eds) Evolutionary Thinking Across Disciplines. Synthese Library, vol 478. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33358-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33358-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33357-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33358-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)