Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agile Visualisierung im Design Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neue Trends in Wirtschaftsinformatik und eingesetzte Technologien

  • 1838 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel wird ein agiler Visualisierungsansatz vorgestellt, der einen der am weitesten verbreiteten Innovationsprozesse unterstützt: Design Thinking. Der Ansatz integriert die vordefinierten grafischen Elemente von SAP Scenes, um digitale Szenen für Storyboards zu entwerfen. Unvorhergesehene Szenarien können durch das Einfügen neuer grafischer Elemente und damit verbundener domänenspezifischer Aspekte on-the-fly erstellt werden. Dies fördert das Problemverständnis und die Ideenfindung, die andernfalls durch den Mangel an Elementen behindert würden. Der symbolische, auf künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) basierende Ansatz gewährleistet die maschinelle Interpretierbarkeit der skizzierten Szenen. Im Gegenzug wird die Plausibilitätsprüfung der Szenen automatisiert, um die Designer bei der Erstellung sinnvoller Storyboards zu unterstützen. Die Plausibilitätsprüfung beinhaltet die Verwendung einer Domänen-Ontologie, die mit semantischen Einschränkungen versehen ist. Der Ansatz ist in dem Prototyp AOAME4Scenes implementiert, der für die Evaluierung verwendet wird.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Das Storyboard wurde im Innovationsraum des Herman Hollerith Zentrums (HHZ) der Hochschule Reutlingen realisiert.

  2. 2.

    http://www.hhz.de/home/.

Literatur

  1. Bridgeland, D.M., Zahavi, R.: Business Modeling: A Practical Guide to Realizing Business Value. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sibbet, D.: Visual Meetings: How Graphics, Sticky Notes and Idea Mapping Can Transform Group Productivity. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taborda, E., Chandrasegaran, S.K., Kisselburgh, L., Reid, T., Ramani, K.: Enhancing visual thinking in a toy design course using freehand sketching. In: ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, S. 267–276. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cross, N.: Natural intelligence in design. Des. Stud. 20(1), 25–39 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xin, M.: 3D sketching and collaborative design with napkin sketch. Ph.D. thesis, University of Calgary (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knapp, J., Zeratsky, J., Kowitz, B.: Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days. Simon & Schuster, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Plattner, H.: An Introduction to Design Thinking Process Guide. The Institute of Design at Stanford, Stanford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jonson, B.: Design ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age. Des. Stud. 26(6), 613–624 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Razzouk, R., Shute, V.: What is design thinking and why is it important. Rev. Educ. Res. 82(3), 330–348 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohamed, A., Claudia, B.: Designing a digital service to improve the user experience of conference organizers. Master thesis, Chalmers University of Technology Sweden (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wong, N.H.: Making user-focused prototype using design sprint to test, design, and prototype mobile app rapidly. Ph.D. thesis, Tampere University of Applied Sciences (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fehlau, A.: Collaborative sketching – drawing a bridge between ideation and prototyping. https://experience.sap.com/skillup/collaborative-sketching-drawing-a-bridge-between-ideation-and-prototyping/. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  13. UXM: A guide to sketch storming – a design game for ideation – UXM. http://www.uxforthemasses.com/sketch-storming/. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  14. Nováková, K., Jakubal, V., Achten, H., Matějovská, D.: Collab sketch. eCAADe. 2013(18), 213 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lindley, S., Cao, X., Helmes, J., Morris, R., Meek, S.: Towards a tool for design ideation: insights from use of SketchStorm. In: Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference. British Computer Society, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Detken, K.: Scenes: a new method and tool to create storyboards. https://experience.sap.com/skillup/scenes-new-method-tool-create-storyboards/. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  17. de Vere, I., Kapoor, A., Melles, G., et al.: Developing a drawing culture: new directions in engineering education. In: DS 68-8: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Vol. 8 S. 226–235. Design Education, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–19 July (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hohmann, M.: The final output of the front end innovation process. In: 6th IBA Bachelor Thesis Conference, University of Twente, Enschede (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. SAP: Scenes Concept and Building Guide. https://experience.sap.com/designservices/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/07/ScenesConceptAndBuildingGuidepdf-2.pdf. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  20. Laurenzi, E., Hinkelmann, K., Izzo, S., Reimer, U., Merwe, A.V.D.: Towards an agile and ontology-aided modeling environment for DSML adaptation. In: International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, S. 222–234. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Laurenzi, E., Hinkelmann, K., van der Merwe, A.: An agile and ontology-aided modeling environment. In: Buchmann, R.A., Karagiannis, D., Kirikova, M. (Hrsg.) IFIP Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling, S. 221–237. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Digitrans-Consortium: digitrans method for the digital transformation of smes. https://informatik.univie.ac.at/en/research/projects/project/278/. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  23. Miron, E.T., Muck, C., Karagiannis, D.: Transforming haptic storyboards into diagrammatic models: the scene2model tool. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. OMILab: ADOxx Meta-Modelling Platform. https://www.adoxx.org/live/home. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  25. Beckman, S., Barry, M.: Design and innovation through storytelling. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 1(4), 151–160 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sketchboard: Creative team sketching and diagramming on an endless online whiteboard. https://sketchboard.io/. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  27. SketchTogether: Sketchtogether – a real time whiteboard for the web. https://sketchtogether.com/. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  28. Dam, R., Siang, T.: Stage 4 in the design thinking process: prototype|interaction design foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/stage-4-in-the-design-thinking-process-prototype/. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  29. Miron, E.T., Muck, C., Karagiannis, D., Götzinger, D.: Transforming storyboards into diagrammatic models. In: Chapman, P., Stapleton, G., Moktefi, A., Perez-Kriz, S., Bellucci, F. (Hrsg.) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, S. 770–773. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Hevner, A.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19(2), 4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, B.: Design science research in information systems. J. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Interaction design foundation: what is design thinking? https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/design-thinking. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  33. Schallmo, D., Williams, C.A., Lang, K.: An integrated design thinking approach-literature review, basic principles and roadmap for design thinking. In: ISPIM Innovation Symposium, S. 1–18. The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), University of Trondheim (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lindberg, T., Meinel, C., Wagner, R.: Design thinking: a fruitful concept for it development. In: Design Thinking, S. 3–18. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Lucena, P., Braz, A., Chicoria, A., Tizzei, L.: IBM design thinking software development framework. In: Brazilian Workshop on Agile Methods. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dam, R., Siang, T.: Introduction to the essential ideation techniques which are the heart of design thinking. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/introduction-to-the-essential-ideation-techniques-which-are-the-heart-of-design-thinking. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  37. Walker, R., Ap Cenydd, L., Pop, S., Miles, H.C., Hughes, C.J., Teahan, W.J., Roberts, J.C.: Storyboarding for visual analytics. Inf. Vis. 14(1), 27–50 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mural: Think and collaborate visually. Anywhere, anytime. https://mural.co/. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  39. Wüest, D., Seyff, N., Glinz, M.: Flexisketch team: collaborative sketching and notation creation on the fly. In: IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, S. 685–688. University of Zurich (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Google Creative Lab: AutoDraw. https://experiments.withgoogle.com/autodraw. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  41. OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0. January. Object Management Group OMG, Needham (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  42. The Open Group: ArchiMate 3.0.1 Specification. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/. Zugegriffen am 01.12.2019

  43. Sandholm, T., Lee, D., Tegelund, B., Han, S., Shin, B., Kim, B.: Cloudfridge: a testbed for smart fridge interactions. arXiv:1401.0585. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  44. W3C: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL). https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/ (2017). Zugegriffen am 01.06.2019

  45. Laurenzi, E., Hinkelmann, K., Jüngling, S., Montecchiari, D., Pande, C., Martin, A.: Towards an assistive and pattern learning-driven process modeling approach. In: Martin, A., Hinkelmann, K., Gerber, A., Lenat, D., van Harmelen, F., Clark, P. (Hrsg.) AAAI Spring Symposium: Combining Machine Learning with Knowledge Engineering, S. 6, Palo Alto (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz FHNW, Hochschule für Wirtschaft, Forschungsgruppe Intelligente Informationssysteme, Olten, Schweiz

    Emanuele Laurenzi, Knut Hinkelmann, Devid Montecchiari & Mini Goel

  2. Abteilung für Informatik, Universität Pretoria, Pretoria, Südafrika

    Emanuele Laurenzi & Knut Hinkelmann

  3. Universität von Camerino, Camerino, Italien

    Devid Montecchiari

Authors
  1. Emanuele Laurenzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Knut Hinkelmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Devid Montecchiari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mini Goel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuele Laurenzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz FHNW, Hochschule für Wirtschaft, Basel, Schweiz

    Rolf Dornberger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laurenzi, E., Hinkelmann, K., Montecchiari, D., Goel, M. (2023). Agile Visualisierung im Design Thinking. In: Dornberger, R. (eds) Neue Trends in Wirtschaftsinformatik und eingesetzte Technologien. Springer Vieweg, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32538-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation