Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Pushover and Incremental Dynamic Analysis for Failure Mode of Base-Isolated Buildings in Extreme Events

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Building for the Future: Durable, Sustainable, Resilient (fib Symposium 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 350))

  • 1544 Accesses

Abstract

The latest seismic design codes aim to provide the linear behavior of the superstructure of base-isolated buildings at the Maximum Considered Earthquake level. However, the failure mode order of the superstructure and the isolators should be determined in the case of using the high response modification factors. Generally, this approach is achieved using pushover analysis. For this reason, the lateral load distribution of the superstructure is crucial. In this study, a 7-story seismically isolated model is designed and subjected to the thirty spectrally matched ground motions at the Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) level. Then the obtained lateral load distribution of the nonlinear time history analyses is compared with the uniform and inverse triangular load distributions. The results reveal that the uniform and inverse triangular load distributions underestimate the superstructure load distribution. Later, Incremental Dynamic Analyses (IDA) are carried out, and the results are compared with those of pushover analyses using various lateral load distributions. The comparison results of the IDA and pushover method indicate that pushover analysis with code-based lateral load distribution causes conservative results for the superstructure strength compared to IDA results. Thus, the failure mode order differs for pushover analysis using ASCE 7–16 lateral load and for IDA analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kikuchi M, Black ID, Aiken ID (2008) On the response of yielding seismically isolated structures. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 37(21):659–679. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Güneş N (2021) Risk-targeted design of seismically isolated buildings. J Build Eng :103665. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2021.103665

  3. American Society of Civil Engineering (2017) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE standard ASCE/SEI 7–16. Virginia, USA. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780872629042

  4. Kitayama S, Constantinou MC (2018) Collapse performance of seismically isolated buildings designed by the procedures of ASCE/SEI 7. Eng Struct 164(March):243–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Güneş N, Ulucan ZÇ (2021) Collapse probability of code-based design of a seismically isolated reinforced concrete building. Structures 33:2402–2412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. International Conference of Building Officials (1991) ICBO: Uniform Building Code (1991). Whittier, CA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Winters CW, Constantinou MC (1993) Evaluation of Static and Response Spectrum Analysis Procedures of SEAOC/UBC for Seismic Isolated Structures,Technical Report NCEER-93-0004

    Google Scholar 

  8. ASCE (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE standard ASCE/SEI 7–10

    Google Scholar 

  9. Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (2018) Turkish building earthquake code (TBEC). Ankara, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  10. York K, Ryan KL (2008) Distribution of lateral forces in base-isolated buildings considering isolation system nonlinearity. J Earthquake Eng 12(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802003751

  11. Krawinkler H, Seneviratna GDPK (1998) Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Eng Struct 20(4–6). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8

  12. Sucuoǧlu H, Günay MS (2011) Generalized force vectors for multi-mode pushover analysis. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1020

  13. Akköse M, Sunca F, Türkay A (2018) Pushover analysis of prefabricated structures with various partially fixity rates. Earthquake Struct 14(1). https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.1.021

  14. Chopra AK, Goel RK (2004). A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 33(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.380

  15. Aydinoǧlu MN (2003) An incremental response spectrum analysis procedure based on inelastic spectral displacements for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation. Bull Earthq Eng 1(1):3–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024853326383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujii K, Masuda T (2021) Application of mode-adaptive bidirectional pushover analysis to an irregular reinforced concrete building retrofitted via base isolation. Appl Sci (Switzerland) 11(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219829

  17. Fujii K, Mogi Y, Noguchi T (2020) Predicting maximum and cumulative response of a base-isolated building using pushover analysis. Buildings 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS10050091

  18. Providakis CP (2008) Pushover analysis of base-isolated steel-concrete composite structures under near-fault excitations. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.06.012

  19. Faal HN, Poursha M (2017) Applicability of the N2, extended N2 and modal pushover analysis methods for the seismic evaluation of base-isolated building frames with lead rubber bearings (LRBs). Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.036

  20. Structural Engineers Association of Northern California (SEAONC) (1986). Tentative Seismic Isolation Design Requirements. San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kilar V, Koren D (2010) Simplified inelastic seismic analysis of base-isolated structures using the N2 method. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 39(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.978

  22. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 31(3):491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Disaster and Emergency Management Authority. Turkish Sesimic Hazard Map 2018: https://tdth.afad.gov.tr/TDTH/main.xhtml

  24. Computers and Stuctures Inc. (2016) ETABS Extended 3D Analysis of Building Systems, version 16.0

    Google Scholar 

  25. Computers and Stuctures Inc. (2018) Perform-3D , Nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3D structures, version 7.0.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. PEER Ground Motion Database (2014). University of California, California

    Google Scholar 

  27. Seismosoft (2021) SeismoMatch: earthquake software for response spectrum matching, Version 2021

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pant DR, Constantinou MC, Wijeyewickrema AC (2013) Re-evaluation of equivalent lateral force procedure for prediction of displacement demand in seismically isolated structures. Eng Struct 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.013

  29. Merino RJ, Perrone D, Filiatrault A (2020) Consistent floor response spectra for performance-based seismic design of nonstructural elements. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 49(3):261–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. De Domenico D, Falsone G, Ricciardi G (2018) Improved response-spectrum analysis of base-isolated buildings: a substructure-based response spectrum method. Eng Struct 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.037

  31. Bhandari M, Bharti SD, Shrimali MK, Datta TK (2018) Assessment of proposed lateral load patterns in pushover analysis for base-isolated frames. Eng Struct 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.080

  32. Haselton CB, Asce M, Liel AB, Asce M, Deierlein GG, Asce F et al (2011) Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. I : Assessment of Ductile Moment Frames 137(April):481–491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Deger ZT, Yang TY, Wallace JW, Moehle J (2015) Seismic performance of reinforced concrete core wall buildings with and without moment resisting frames. Struct Des Tall Special Build 24(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1175

  34. Panagiotou M, Restrepo JI (2009) Dual-plastic hinge design concept for reducing higher-mode effects on high-rise cantilever wall buildings. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 38(12). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.905

  35. Güneş N, Ulucan ZÇ (2019) Nonlinear dynamic response of a tall building to near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Bull Earthq Eng 17(6):2989–3013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00570-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architecture, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey

    Necmettin Güneş

Authors
  1. Necmettin Güneş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Necmettin Güneş .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Sarıyer-Istanbul, Türkiye

    Alper Ilki

  2. Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Sarıyer-Istanbul, Türkiye

    Derya Çavunt

  3. Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Sarıyer-Istanbul, Türkiye

    Yavuz Selim Çavunt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Güneş, N. (2023). Comparison of Pushover and Incremental Dynamic Analysis for Failure Mode of Base-Isolated Buildings in Extreme Events. In: Ilki, A., Çavunt, D., Çavunt, Y.S. (eds) Building for the Future: Durable, Sustainable, Resilient. fib Symposium 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 350. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32511-3_121

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32511-3_121

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32510-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32511-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation