Skip to main content

Humanitarian Logistics Under Uncertainty: Planning for Sheltering and Evacuation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uncertainty in Facility Location Problems

Abstract

This chapter focuses on a major area emerging in the context of humanitarian logistics: emergency evacuation planning and management. Two major aspects are covered: shelter site location and evacuation traffic assignment. Both are discussed separately before an integrated problem is considered. Throughout the chapter, uncertainty in the underlying parameters is assumed. The major sources of uncertainty analyzed are the demand for sheltering and capacity of the edges in the underlying network. Congestion issues emerge in this context that are also considered. Different paradigms for capturing uncertainty are considered for illustrative purposes, namely, robust optimization, chance-constrained programming, and stochastic programming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdelgawad, H., & Abdulhai, B. (2009). Emergency evacuation planning as a network design problem: a critical review. Transportation Letters, 1, 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARC. (2002). Standards for hurricane evacuation shelter selection, ARC 4496. Technical report. American Red Cross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayram, V. (2016). Optimization models for large scale network evacuation planning and management: a literature review. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 21(2), 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayram, V., Tansel, B.Ç., & Yaman, H. (2015). Compromising system and user interests in shelter location and evacuation planning. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 72, 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayram, V., & Yaman, H. (2018a). Shelter location and evacuation route assignment under uncertainty: A benders decomposition approach. Transportation Science, 52(2), 416–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayram, V., & Yaman, H. (2018b). A stochastic programming approach for shelter location and evacuation planning. RAIRO-Operations Research, 52(3):779–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, K. (1966). A flow travel time relationship for use in transportation planning. In Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) Conference, 3rd, 1966, Sydney (Vol. 3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, M., Marcotte, P., & Stan, M. (1995). The congested facility location problem. Location Science, 3(1), 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DHS. (2019). Planning considerations: Evacuation and shelter-in-place guidance for state, local, tribal, and territorial partners. US Department of Homeland Security. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/planning-considerations-evacuation-and-shelter-in-place.pdf.

  • Dönmez, Z., Kara, B. Y., Karsu, Ö., & Saldanha-da-Gama, F. (2021). Humanitarian facility location under uncertainty: Critical review and future prospects. Omega, 102, 102,393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espejo, I., Marín, A., & Rodríguez-Chía, A. M. (2012). Closest assignment constraints in discrete location problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 219, 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA. (2006). Risk management series, safe rooms and shelters: Protecting people against terrorist attacks, FEMA 453. Technical report. Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA. (2008). Design and construction guidance for community safe rooms, FEMA (p. 361, 2nd edn.) Technical report. Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA. (2021). Improving public messaging for evacuation and shelter-in-place, findings and recommendations for emergency managers from peer-reviewed research. US Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_improving-public-messaging-for-evacuation-and-shelter-in-place_literature-review-report.pdf.

  • FHWA. (2007). Using highways for no-notice evacuations. Federal Highway Administration, Routes to Effective Evacuation Planning Primer Series FHWA-HOP-08-003. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1564165488078-09ab4aac641f77fe7b7dd30bad21526b/Planning_Considerations_Evacuation_and_Shelter-in-Place.pdf.

  • Fischetti, M., Ljubić, I., & Sinnl, M. (2016). Benders decomposition without separability: A computational study for capacitated facility location problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(3), 557–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenshields, B., Channing, W., Miller, H., et al. (1935). A study of traffic capacity. In: Highway Research Board Proceedings, National Research Council (USA), Highway Research Board (vol. 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, O., Möhring, R. H., Schulz, A. S., & Stier-Moses, N. E. (2005). System-optimal routing of traffic flows with user constraints in networks with congestion. Operations Research, 53(4), 600–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kınay, O., Kara, B., Saldanha-da-Gama, F., & Correia, I. (2018). Modeling the shelter site location problem using chance constraints: A case study for Istanbul. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(1), 132–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kılcı, F., Kara, B. Y., & Bozkaya, B. (2015). Locating temporary shelter areas after an earthquake: A case for Turkey. European Journal of Operational Research, 243, 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kınay, O., Saldanha-da-Gama, F., & Kara, B. (2019). On multi-criteria chance-constrained capacitated single-source discrete facility location problems. Omega, 83, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulshrestha, A., Wu, D., Lou, Y., & Yin, Y. (2011). Robust shelter locations for evacuation planning with demand uncertainty. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 3(4), 272–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, A. C., Xu, N., Nozick, L., & Davidson, R. (2011). Bilevel optimization for integrated shelter location analysis and transportation planning for hurricane events. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 17(4), 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, A. C. Y., Nozick, L., Xu, N., & Davidson, R. (2012). Shelter location and transportation planning under hurricane conditions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(4), 715–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., & Jin, M. (2010) Sheltering planning and management for natural disasters. In: Proceedings of THC-IT 2010—Texas Hurricane Center for Innovative Technology. Texas, USA: University of Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., Murray-Tuite, P., Wolshon, B., & Baker, E. J. (2018). Large-scale evacuation: The analysis, modeling, and management of emergency relocation from hazardous areas. CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., & Prater, C. S. (2007). Critical behavioral assumptions in evacuation time estimate analysis for private vehicles: Examples from hurricane research and planning. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 133(1), 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostajabdaveh, M., Gutjahr, W. J., & Salman, F. S. (2019). Inequity-averse shelter location for disaster preparedness. IISE Transactions, 51, 809–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, P., Wolf, R., & Hampson, R. (2005). The evacuation worked, but created a highway horror. USA Today (pp. 712–716). http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-09-25-evacuation-cover_x.htm

  • Ozbay, E., Özlem, Ç., & Kara, B. Y. (2019). Shelter site location under multi-hazard scenarios. Computers & Operations Research, 106, 102–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2, 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for general loss functions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26, 1443–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. (2021). Tutorial on risk neutral, distributionally robust and risk averse multistage stochastic programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 288, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y. (1985). Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Z. J. M., Pannala, J., Rai, R., & Tsoi, T. S. (2008). Modeling transportation networks during disruptions and emergency evacuations. Technical report. Modeling Transportation Networks During Disruptions and Emergency Evacuations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H., Wang, Y., & Xue, Y. (2021). A bi-objective robust optimization model for disaster response planning under uncertainties. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 155, 107,213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TAM. (1964). Traffic Assignment Manual. Bureau of Public Roads, US Department of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. R., Garfin, D. R., & Silver, R. C. (2017). Evacuation from natural disasters: A systematic review of the literature. Risk Analysis, 37(4), 812–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDHS. (2013). National response framework. Department of Homeland Security, WD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. L., & Falkson, L. M. (1975). The optimal nodal location of public facilities with price-sensitive demand. Geographical Analysis, 7, 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H. (2013). Model building in mathematical programming (5th edn.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, C., & Turnquist, M. A. (2009). Integrated evacuation network optimization and emergency vehicle assignment. Transportation Research Record, 2091, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahyaei, M., & Bozorgi-Amiri, A. (2019). Robust reliable humanitarian relief network design: an integration of shelter and supply facility location. Annals of Operations Research, 283, 897–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahar Y. Kara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bayram, V., Kara, B.Y., Saldanha-da-Gama, F., Yaman, H. (2023). Humanitarian Logistics Under Uncertainty: Planning for Sheltering and Evacuation. In: Eiselt, H.A., Marianov, V. (eds) Uncertainty in Facility Location Problems. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 347. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32338-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics