Skip to main content

The Impact of Russia’s War against Ukraine on Finland and Sweden’s Decision to Join NATO: Effects on the Global Nuclear Order

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Russia’s War on Ukraine

Abstract

Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine has caused a shift in the traditional nonalignment stance of Finland and Sweden, leading them to seek membership in the nuclear alliance. This change in security approach has implications for the global nuclear order, particularly in terms of nuclear disarmament and deployment. Despite the presence of public support for NATO membership in both countries, Finland and Sweden encountered challenges in their accession process. These challenges included Hungary’s delay in ratifying their applications and Türkiye’s conditional support to the accession of the two Nordic countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following the 1961 Berlin Crisis, Richard Lowenthal coined the pejorative term “Finlandization” to describe Russia’s political influence over Finland in the Cold War (Laqueur, 1977).

  2. 2.

    Nuclear renunciation describes “the set of decisions leading to the final outcome of a given actor not possessing nuclear weapons” (Pelopidas, 2015, pp. 337–48). On researching renunciation, see Kjølv Egeland (2022), and Maria Rost Rublee (2009). For Sweden’s renunciation, see Thomas Jonter (2016).

  3. 3.

    The concept of hegemonic nuclear order is a frequently employed descriptor for our current state of nuclear affairs, i.e., “a limited few countries are allowed to possess nuclear weapons, and the longterm promises of these nations to disarm their nuclear arsenals have not yet been fulfilled” (Jonter & Rosengren, 2022). Although this specific phrasing is relatively new, criticisms of the hegemonic nuclear order are not (ibid.). Indeed, histories of the hegemonic nuclear order, even those produced prior to the opening for signature of the NPT, “have often departed from or even challenged the narratives of those select few states who benefit from it” (ibid.). While Ritchie, (2019) describes the TPNW as a counter-hegemonic challenge to the present nuclear order, he supports Considine’s (2019) argument that it does not challenge the hegemonic structure as such.

  4. 4.

    Nuclear anarchy is a theory that refers to a state of international relations in which there is no central authority or mechanism for controlling the spread and use of nuclear weapons. On the concept of nuclear anarchy, see Robert Jervis (1989).

  5. 5.

    Nuclear stability is a concept in international relations theory that refers to the idea that the possession of nuclear weapons by multiple states creates a stable balance of power and deters conflict. On the concept of nuclear stability theory, please see the seminal work of Thomas Schelling (1966) and Waltz (1981).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adérito Vicente .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vicente, A., Alkış, M.A., Maksymenko, I. (2023). The Impact of Russia’s War against Ukraine on Finland and Sweden’s Decision to Join NATO: Effects on the Global Nuclear Order. In: Vicente, A., Sinovets, P., Theron, J. (eds) Russia’s War on Ukraine. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32221-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics