Skip to main content

Effect of Soil Material Uncertainty on Seismic Response of Medium-Rise RC Frames Considering Soil-Structure Interaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 2022 Eurasian OpenSees Days (EOS 2022)

Abstract

Past earthquakes like the Mexico City earthquake of 1985 have highlighted the effect of soft soils on the seismic response of structures. Several researchers have concluded that the consideration of soil-structure interaction is essential. Most studies on reinforced concrete (RC) buildings considering SSI, carried out in the past, have not considered the soil material uncertainty. It is worth mentioning that soil properties contain a certain level of uncertainty that can influence the RC frame’s response under the influence of SSI. The present work focuses on quantifying the effect of soil material uncertainty on the response of RC frame building. A planar mid-rise RC moment frame, designed as per Indian standard codes, has been considered and modelled in OpenSees. The numerical model of the frame along with soil is analyzed using the direct approach by considering the nonlinear behavior of both soil and structure. The uncertainty in the soil properties is considered in terms of Cohesion, Unit weight, Poisson's ratio, and Shear modulus, with the coefficient of variation (COV) as 10%. Further, 50 samples of material properties are generated assuming lognormal distribution which are combined using the Latin-Hypercube sampling (LHS) method to maintain the equal probability. A total of 1200 numerical analyses are performed, considering 24 ground motion records. Peak inter-story drift ratio (PISDR) and peak roof displacement (PRD) are the considered engineering demand parameters (EDPs) and a statistical study has been performed to understand the effect of soil material uncertainty on the seismic response of the RC frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mylonakis, G., Gazetas, G.: Seismic soil-structure interaction: beneficial or detrimental? J. Earthquake Eng. 4(3), 277–301 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460009350372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jennings, P.C., Bielak, J.: Dynamics of building-soil interaction. Bull. Tile Seismol. Soc. America 63(1) (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Galal, K., Naimi, M.: Effect of soil conditions on the response of reinforced concrete tall structures to near-fault earthquakes. Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 17(3), 541–562 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karapetrou, S.T., Fotopoulou, S.D., Pitilakis, K.D.: Seismic vulnerability assessment of high-rise non-ductile RC buildings considering soil-structure interaction effects. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 73, 42–57 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Raychowdhury, P.: Effect of soil parameter uncertainty on seismic demand of low-rise steel buildings on dense silty sand. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 29(10), 1367–1378 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rajeev, P., Tesfamariam, S.: Seismic fragilities of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames with consideration of soil structure interaction. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 40, 78–86 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akhoondi, M.R., Behnamfar, F.: Seismic fragility curves of steel structures including soil-structure interaction and variation of soil parameters. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106609

  8. Nguyen, H.D., Shin, M.: Effects of soil–structure interaction on seismic performance of a low-rise R/C moment frame considering material uncertainties. J. Build. Eng. 44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102713

  9. Asten, M.W., Boore, D.M.: Comparison of Shear-Velocity Profiles of Unconsolidated Sediments near the Coyote Borehole (CCOC) Measured with Fourteen Invasive and Non-Invasive Methods (2005). https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG10.2.85

  10. Moss, R.E.S.: Quantifying measurement uncertainty of thirty-meter shear-wave velocity. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98(3), 1399–1411 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tomeo, R., Pitilakis, D., Bilotta, A., Nigro, E.: SSI effects on seismic demand of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames. Eng. Struct. 173, 559–572 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karafagka, S., Fotopoulou, S., Pitilakis, D.: Fragility curves of non-ductile RC frame buildings on saturated soils including liquefaction effects and soil–structure interaction. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 19(15), 6443–6468 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01081-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP): Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings. Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kohrangi, M., Bazzurro, P., Vamvatsikos, D.: Vector and scalar IMs in structural response estimation, part II: building demand assessment. Earthquake Spectra 32(3):1525–1543 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1193/053115EQS081M

  15. Singh, Y., Gade, P., Lang, D.H., Erduran, E.: Seismic behavior of buildings located on slopes, an analytical study and some observations from Sikkim earthquake of September 18, 2011. In: Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. IS 1893 Part 1: Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1: General provisions and buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. IS 456: Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete code of practise, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Fenves, G.L., Scott, M.H.: Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), University of California, Berkeley, CA (2009). http://opensees.berkeley.edu

  19. Bao, H., et al.: Large-scale simulation of elastic wave propagation in heterogeneous media on parallel computers. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 152(1–2), 85–102 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00183-7

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lysmer, J., Kuhlemeyer, R.L.: Finite dynamic model for infinite media. Eng. Mech. 1969(95), 859–877 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Joyner, W.B., Chen, A.T.: Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. America 65(5), 1315–36 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J., Park, R.: Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 114(8), 1804–26 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yang, Z., Lu, J., Elgamal, A.: OpenSees Soil Models and Solid- Fluid Fully Coupled Elements, User’s Manual, ver. 1.0. University of California, San Diego (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rayleigh, J.W.S., Lindsay, R.B.: The theory of sound - Dover Publications, New York (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kwok, A.O.L., et al.: Use of exact solutions of wave propagation problems to guide implementation of nonlinear seismic ground response analysis procedures. J. Geotechn. Eng. 133(11), 1385–1398 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankit Kumar Goyal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hoda, S., Goyal, A.K., Gade, M., Sharma, N. (2023). Effect of Soil Material Uncertainty on Seismic Response of Medium-Rise RC Frames Considering Soil-Structure Interaction. In: Di Trapani, F., Demartino, C., Marano, G.C., Monti, G. (eds) Proceedings of the 2022 Eurasian OpenSees Days. EOS 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30125-4_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30125-4_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30124-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30125-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics