Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical Ethics and the Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics in Intensive Care Medicine

Part of the book series: Lessons from the ICU ((LEICU))

  • 344 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter gives a general overview of the interconnectedness of clinical ethics and the law. It deals with the various aspects of health care in the intensive care unit, from patient rights to the practices of caregivers. Laws differ from country to country, and in this chapter, some of these differences are highlighted. A set of core ethical matters with common situations in the intensive care unit will bring together ethics and the law. Knowledge of the applicable law where the clinician practices is indispensable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Singer P. Ethics. In: Encyclopedia Britannica; 2022. https://www.britannica.com/topic/ethics-philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  2. United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

  3. American Medical Association. Patient rights. Code of medical ethics opinion. 1.1.3. 2022. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/patient-rights.

  4. Olejarczyk JP, Young M. Patient rights and ethics. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1635–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Assembly. Resolution 67.19, May 24, 2014. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA67/A67_R19-en.pdf

  8. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Decisions near the end of life. JAMA. 1992;267:2229–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brennan F, Lohman D, Gwyther L. Access to pain management as a human right. Am J Public Health. 2019;109:61–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Grace PJ. Professional advocacy: widening the scope of accountability. Nurs Philos. 2001;2:151–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wendler D. Are physicians obligated always to act in the patient's best interests? J Med Ethics. 2010;36:66–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. United States Congress. H.R.3300—Doctors’ Bill of Rights Act. 1999. https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-bill/3300/all-info

  13. Keown J. The legal revolution: from "sanctity of life" to "quality of life" and "autonomy". J Contemp Health L & Pol'y. 1997;14:253.

    Google Scholar 

  14. DeMartino ES, Dudzinski DM, Doyle CK, et al. Who decides when a patient can't? Statutes on alternate decision makers. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1478–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lautrette A, Peigne V, Watts J, et al. Surrogate decision makers for incompetent ICU patients: a European perspective. Curr Opin Critical Care. 2008;14:714–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Conventions on the Rights of the Child. Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989 entry into force 2 September 1990, in accordance with article 49. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx

  17. Council of Europe. The best interests of the child: a dialogue between theory and practice. Council of Europe 2016. https://rm.coe.int/1680657e56

  18. Pope TM. The best interest standard for health care decision making: definition and defense. Am J Bioeth. 2018;8:36–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. United Kingdom public general acts. Mental Capacity Act 2005. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents

  20. Downar J, You JJ, Bagshaw SM, et al. Nonbeneficial treatment in Canada. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:270–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sprung CL, Eidelman LA, Steinberg A. Is the physician's duty to the individual patient or to society? Crit Care Med. 1995;23:618–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ely EW, Azoulay E, Sprung CL. Eight things we would never do regarding end-of-life care in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:1116–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Carlet J, Thijs LG, Antonelli M, et al. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th international consensus conference in critical care: Brussels. Intensive Care Med. 2003;30:770–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policy statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:1318–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pope TM. Legal fundamentals of surrogate decision making. Chest. 2012;141:1074–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Duttge G. Notvertretungsrecht in der Intensivmedizin. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2022;147:1464–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Marjel van Dam & Jozef Kesecioglu

  2. Center of Medical Law and Department of Criminal Law, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

    Gunnar Duttge

  3. Center for Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, Survivorship (CIBS), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

    E. Wesley Ely

  4. Veteran’s Affairs Geriatric Research Education Clinical Centre (GRECC), Nashville, TN, USA

    E. Wesley Ely

  5. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Charles L. Sprung

  6. Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA

    Aimee B. Milliken

Authors
  1. Marjel van Dam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jozef Kesecioglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gunnar Duttge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Wesley Ely
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Charles L. Sprung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Aimee B. Milliken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjel van Dam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Klinikum Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

    Andrej Michalsen

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Brighton, MA, USA

    Nicholas Sadovnikoff

  3. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Jozef Kesecioglu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Dam, M., Kesecioglu, J., Duttge, G., Ely, E.W., Sprung, C.L., Milliken, A.B. (2023). Clinical Ethics and the Law. In: Michalsen, A., Sadovnikoff, N., Kesecioglu, J. (eds) Ethics in Intensive Care Medicine. Lessons from the ICU. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29390-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29390-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29389-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29390-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation