Skip to main content

Achievements and Hurdles Towards Women’s Access to Climate Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women’s Empowerment and Its Limits
  • 170 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses whether and how women face challenges in accessing climate justice by clarifying the linkages between environmental changes and human rights to assess the current evolution in the Sustainable Development Agenda (notably SDG5: achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls by 2030). In 2022, the 66th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) addressed as a priority topic “gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls in the context of climate change, environmental and disaster risk reduction policies and programmes”. Women and girls, along with other vulnerable groups, such as indigenous peoples, and local communities, are the ones who “are the most affected by land and resource tenure insecurity and environmental degradation”, and they “disproportionately suffer the effects of biodiversity loss”. Despite achievements towards gender equality, women and girls are disproportionately affected by climate change and environmental degradation; this risk is not related to their biological sex, but rather to gender inequalities and gender norms that are rooted in societies. This chapter aims to demonstrate that it is not only exposure to certain hazards, disasters, pollutants and climate change but also the economic and social situation of women that reduces their ability to recover—from both major disasters caused by chronic emergencies and the chronic emergencies themselves—and perpetuates their marginalization and exclusion by limiting their access to climate justice. Due to the structural inequalities they face, women are hugely impacted by the climate crisis and environmental destruction. While the gender equality gaps in education, political and economic participation, and health are priorities of concern at the global level, climate change may increase violence against women and, more generally, slow violence. Against such a backdrop, the chapter aims to highlight how women can contribute significantly to cocreating resilience and adaptation strategies and solutions, given their understanding of the environment and their role as custodians of ancestral and traditional knowledge. This chapter elaborates on the future of women’s human rights from theoretical and empirical perspectives, shedding light on how to engender climate justice and access to justice, and embrace feminist concerns on matters of exploitation and domination of the environment in parallel to the domination and subordination of women by men in society.

Sections 2 and 2.1 have been written by Sara De Vido; sections 3, 3.1 and 3.2 are by Elisa Fornalé. The introduction and conclusion are the outcome of a common reflection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Savaresi (2019); Savaresi and Setzer (2022). In January 2022, the climate litigation databases developed by the Sabin Centre for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law School (http://climatecasechart.com) and the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics (https://climate-laws.org/) listed 90 climate change cases against states that relied on human rights-related arguments.

  2. 2.

    Wewerinke-Singh and Antoniadis (2022). See also Knox (2009).

  3. 3.

    Rodriguez-Garavito (2019).

  4. 4.

    Lyster (2016).

  5. 5.

    Grear (2014); Shue (2016); Heyward and Roser (2016); Grahn-Farley (2022); Chinkin & Charlesworth (2022).

  6. 6.

    MacGregor (2010, pp. 223–224).

  7. 7.

    As highlighted by the 2022 report of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the 2022 agreed conclusions of the Commission on Women, the climate breakdown risks disproportionally affecting the rights of women and girls and it is becoming increasingly central to identify the obstacles that could prevent their access to justice in this regard (IPCCC. 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2. Accessed 30 October 2022; Commission on the Status of Women. 2022. Agreed Conclusion. E/CN.6/2022/L.7).

  8. 8.

    Francioni (2007, p. 64); Francioni (2008, p. 30).

  9. 9.

    Francioni (2007, p. 68); See also CEDAW. 2019. Guidelines on CEDAW General Recommendation No. 38 on Trafficking in Women and Girls in the Context of Global Migration (CEDAW/C/G38).

  10. 10.

    Francioni (2007, p. 69).

  11. 11.

    European Court of Human Rights, Golder v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 4451/70, judgement of 21 February 1975.

  12. 12.

    Ibid., paras. 35 and 36.

  13. 13.

    Cançado (2011, p. 64).

  14. 14.

    Cançado (2011, p. 17).

  15. 15.

    For more on the mechanisms of protection of human rights, see, ex multis, Shelton (2013), De Schutter (2019) and Smith (2021).

  16. 16.

    Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). 2015. General Recommendation on Women’s Access to Justice. CEDAW/C/GC/33, para. 13; See also CEDAW. 2019. Guidelines on CEDAW General Recommendation No. 38 on Trafficking in Women and Girls in the Context of Global Migration (CEDAW/C/G38).

  17. 17.

    Ibid., para. 8.

  18. 18.

    CEDAW. 2010. General Recommendation on the Core Obligations of States Parties under Article 2. CEDAW/C/GC/28, para. 34.

  19. 19.

    Cook and Cusack (2010).

  20. 20.

    Cusack, Simone. 2014. Eliminating Judicial Stereotyping: Equal Access to Justice for Women in Gender-Based Violence Cases. Commissioned by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Women/WRGS/StudyGenderStereotyping.doc. Accessed 30 October 2022.

  21. 21.

    Cusack (2014, p. ii); Esquivel (2016) and Carant (2017).

  22. 22.

    Cusack (2014, p. ii).

  23. 23.

    Karen Tayag Vertido v. The Philippines, CEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008, 22 September 2010.

  24. 24.

    A.F. v. Italy, CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019, 18 July 2022.

  25. 25.

    Ibid. “Under article 5 (a) of the Convention, States parties have an obligation to expose and remove the underlying social and cultural barriers, including gender stereotypes, that prevent women from exercising and claiming their rights and impede their access to effective remedies” (para. 7.5).

  26. 26.

    European Court of Human Rights, J.L. v. Italy, Application No. 5671/16, judgement of 27 May 2021.

  27. 27.

    For a critical analysis of the case, see Ilieva (2021), who stresses, for example, that the Court ignored the authorities’ failure to offer J.L. any support—they offered her no psychological counselling, practical assistance or social intervention.

  28. 28.

    Maguire (2019); Celorio (2022); General Assembly (GA). 2019. Analytical Study on Gender-Responsive Climate Action for the Full and Effective Enjoyment of the Rights of Women. A/HRC/C/41/26.

  29. 29.

    Esquivel (2016), Carant (2017).

  30. 30.

    Nixon (2011).

  31. 31.

    Jones and Otto (2019).

  32. 32.

    De Vido (2021).

  33. 33.

    Nixon (2011).

  34. 34.

    As illustrated by Nixon “slow violence” means “a violence that occurs gradually and out of sight, a violence of delayed destruction that is dispersed across time and space, an attritional violence that is typically not viewed as violence at all” (Nixon 2011, p. 2).

  35. 35.

    UN Secretary General (UNSG). 2022. The Impacts of Climate Change on the Human Rights of People in Vulnerable Situations. A/HRC/50/57, para. 32.

  36. 36.

    Grahn-Farley (2022).

  37. 37.

    The CEDAW Committee adopted a statement on gender and climate change in 2009 to highlight that “all stakeholders should ensure that climate change and disaster risk reduction measures are gender responsive, sensitive to indigenous knowledge systems and respect human rights. Women’s right to participate at all levels of decision-making must be guaranteed in climate change policies and programmes”, CEDAW, 44th Session, August 2009, “Statement of the CEDAW Committee on Disaster Risk Reduction, Gender and Climate Change” (Borras-Pentinat 2022, p. 113; Simm 2019).

  38. 38.

    CEDAW. 2018. General Recommendation No 37 on Gender Related Dimensions of Disaster Risk Reduction in a Changing Climate. UN Doc CEDAW/C/GC/37, para. 37.

  39. 39.

    De Vido (forthcoming 2023).

  40. 40.

    Commission on the Status of Women. 2022. Agreed Conclusion. E/CN.6/2022/L.7.

  41. 41.

    A.F. v. Italy, CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019, 18 July 2022.

  42. 42.

    Celorio (2020).

  43. 43.

    CEDAW, Concluding Observations, Maldives, 23 November 2021; CEDAW, Concluding Observations, Suriname, CEDAW/C/SUR/CO/4-6, 14 March 2018; CEDAW, Concluding Observations, New Zealand, UN Doc CEDAW/C/NZL/CO/8, 25 July 2018.

  44. 44.

    UN Doc CEDAW/C/CPV/CO/9, 30 July 2019, para. 36.

  45. 45.

    UN Doc CEDAW/C/FJI/CO/5, para. 54.

  46. 46.

    UN Doc CEDAW/C/KHM/CO/6, 12 November 2019.

  47. 47.

    UN Doc CEDAW/C/MGL/CO/10, 12 July 2022.

  48. 48.

    “(b) Rural women’s and girls’ limited access to justice, support services for victims of gender-based violence against women, education, information and communications technology and health care”, UN Doc CEDAW/C/BOL/CO/7, 12 July 2022.

  49. 49.

    The recordings of the CSW66 official meetings are available at https://www.unwomen.org/en/csw/csw66-2022/official-meetings. Accessed 30 October 2022.

  50. 50.

    Jenny Yi-Chen Han, Camille Pross, Rashi Agarwal, and Andreea Raluca Torre. 2022. State of Gender Equality and Climate Change in ASEAN. https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2022/08/state-of-gender-equality-and-climate-change-in-asean. Accessed 30 October 2022.

  51. 51.

    ASEAN Declaration on the Gender-Responsive Implementation of the ASEAN Community Vision 2025 and Sustainable Development Goals. 2017. https://asean.org/asean-declaration-on-the-gender-responsive-implementation-of-the-asean-community-vision-2025-and-sustainable-development-goals. Accessed 30 October 2022.

  52. 52.

    National Council for Women (NCW). 2018. National Strategy for the Empowerment of Egyptian Women 2030. Vision and Pillars. http://ncw.gov.eg/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/final-version-national-strategy-for-the-empowerment-of-egyptian-women-2030.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2022.

  53. 53.

    White House. 2021. National Strategy on Gender Equity and Equality. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/National-Strategy-on-Gender-Equity-and-Equality.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2022.

  54. 54.

    UNSG. 2022. The Impacts of Climate Change on the Human Rights of People in Vulnerable Situations. A/HRC/50/57, para. 32.

  55. 55.

    The case Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and others v. Switzerland (application no. 53600/20) has been allocated to the jurisdiction of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights on Friday, 29th April 2022.

  56. 56.

    Bahr et al. (2018); Schmid (2022).

  57. 57.

    Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences. 2022. Violence against indigenous women and girls. A/HRC/50/26.

  58. 58.

    See the most well-known case of this sort, that of Berata Caceres, a global environmental activist who was assassinated in 2016. She played a key role in denouncing the lack of consent and free consultation for the construction of the dam in Honduras. (UNSG 2022, p. 19; Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences. 2022. Violence against indigenous women and girls. A/HRC/50/26, para. 51).

  59. 59.

    UN. 2020. Final Warning: Death Threats and Killings of Human Rights Defenders. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Mary Lawlor. A/HRC/46/35, GA. 2019. Analytical Study on Gender-Responsive Climate Action for the Full and Effective Enjoyment of the Rights of Women. A/HRC/C/41/26, para. 25.

  60. 60.

    Simm (2019, p. 150).

  61. 61.

    Simm (2019, p. 150).

  62. 62.

    Moreno-Lax (2021, p. 43).

  63. 63.

    Commission on the Status of Women. 2022. Agreed Conclusion. E/CN.6/2022/L.7.

References

  • Bahr, Cordelia Christiane, Ursula Brunner, Kristin Casper, and Sandra H. Lustig. 2018. KlimaSeniorinnen: Lessons from the Swiss Senior Women’s Case for Future Climate Litigation. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 9: 194–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borras-Pentinat, Susana. 2022. Gender Climate Justice in a Context of Intersectional Vulnerabilities. In Understanding Vulnerability in the Context of Climate Change, ed. Maria del Mar Campins Eritja and Rahma Bentirou Mathlouthi, 103–122. Barcelona: Atelier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cançado Trindade, Antônio A. 2011. The Access of Individuals to International Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carant, Jane Briant. 2017. Unheard Voices: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Millennium Development Goals’ Evolution into the Sustainable Development Goals. Third World Quarterly 38 (1): 16–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celorio, Rosa. 2020. Several Steps Forward, One Backward: Climate Change, Latin America, and Human Rights Resilience. Maryland Journal of International Law 96: 133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2022. Women and International Human Rights in Modern Times: A Contemporary Casebook. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, Hilary, and Christine Chinkin. 2022. The Boundaries of International Law. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Rebecca J., and Simone Cusack. 2010. Gender Stereotyping: Transnational Legal Perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cusack, Simone. 2014. Eliminating Judicial Stereotyping: Equal Access to Justice for Women in Gender-Based Violence Cases. Commissioned by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Women/WRGS/StudyGenderStereotyping.doc. Accessed 30 October 2022.

  • De Schutter, Olivier. 2019. International Human Rights Law. Cases, Materials, Commentary. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Vido, Sara. 2021. A Quest for an Eco-centric Approach to International Law: The COVID-19 Pandemic as Game Changer. Jus Cogens 2: 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2023. In dubio pro futuris generationibus: una risposta giuridica eco-centrica alla slow violence, in Micaela Frulli (eds), L’interesse delle future generazioni nel diritto internazionale e dell’Unione europea. Forthcoming. Napoli: Scientifica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esquivel, Valeria. 2016. Power and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Feminist Analysis. Gender & Development 24: 1, 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francioni, Francesco. 2007. Access to Justice as a Human Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Il diritto di accesso alla giustizia nel diritto internazionale generale. In Accesso alla giustizia dell’individuo nel diritto internazionale e dell’Unione Europea, ed. Francesco Francioni, Marco Gestri, Natalino Ronzitti, and Tullio Scovazzi, 3–44. Milano: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahn-Farley, Maria. 2022. The Human Rights Claim in Climate Justice: Children Leading the Way. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice 25: 439–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grear, Anna. 2014. Towards ‘Climate Justice’? A Critical Reflection on Legal Subjectivity and Climate Injustice: Warning Signals, Patterned Hierarchies, Directions for Future Law and Policy. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 5: 103–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyward, Clare, and Dominic Roser. 2016. Climate Justice in a Non-Ideal World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ilieva, Margarita S. 2021. J.L. v. Italy: A Survivor of Trivictimisation – Naming a Court’s Failure to Fully (Recognize and) Acknowledge Judicial Gender-Based Revictimisation. Strasbourg Observers. https://strasbourgobservers.com/2021/09/06/j-l-v-italy-a-survivor-of-trivictimisation-naming-a-courts-failure-to-fully-recognize-and-acknowledge-judicial-gender-based-revictimisation. Accessed 22 July 2022.

  • Jepsen, Henrik, Magnus Lundgren, Kai Monheim, and Hayley Walker. 2021. Negotiating the Paris Agreements. The Insider Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones Emily, and Otto Dianne. 2019. Thinking through anthropocentrism in international law: queer theory, posthuman feminism and the postcolonial, in LSE Blog, https://www.lse.ac.uk/women-peacesecurity/assets/documents/2020/Final-Jones-and-Otto-Anthropocentrism-Posthuman-Feminism-Postcol-and-ILLSE-WPS-Blog-2019-002.pdf

  • Knox, John H. 2009. Linking Human Rights and Climate Change at the United Nations. Harvard Environmental Law Review 33: 477–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, Rosemary. 2016. Climate Justice and Disaster Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, S. 2010. Gender and Climate Change: From Impacts to Discourses. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 6: 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2010.536669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, Rowena. 2019. Gender, Climate Change and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. In Research Handbook on Feminist Engagement with International Law, ed. Susan Harris Rimmer and Kate Ogg, 63–80. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Lax, Violeta. 2021. Intersectionality, Forced Migration, and Jus-Generation of the Right to Flee: Theorising a Composite Entitlement to Leave to Escape Irreversible Harm. In Migration and the European Convention on Human Rights, ed. Başak Çalı et al., 43–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Garavito, César. 2019. Empowered Participatory Jurisprudence, Experimentation, Deliberation and Norms in Socioeconomic Rights Adjudication. In The Future of Economic and Social Rights, ed. Katharine G. Young, 233–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Savaresi, Annalisa, and Juan Auz. 2019. Climate Change Litigation and Human Rights: Pushing the Boundaries. Climate Law 9: 244–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savaresi, A., and J. Setzer. 2022. Rights-Based Litigation in the Climate Emergency: Mapping the Landscape and New Knowledge Frontiers. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 13: 7–34. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2022.01.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savaresi, A., et al. 2022. Climate Change Litigation and Human Rights: Stocktaking and a Look at the Future. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 13: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2022.0001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, Evelyne. 2022. Victim Status Before the ECtHR in Cases of Alleged Omissions: The Swiss Climate Case. EJIL: Talk. https://www.ejiltalk.org/victim-status-before-the-ecthr-in-cases-of-alleged-omissions-the-swiss-climate-case. Accessed 30 October 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, Dinah. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shue, Henry. 2016. Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simm, Gabrielle. 2019. Gender, Disasters and International Law. In Research Handbook on Feminist Engagement with International Law, ed. Susan Harris and Kate Ogg, 118–133. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Rhona K. M. 2021. International Human Rights Law. Ed. 10. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wewerinke-Singh, Margaretha, and Melina Antoniadis. 2022. Vessel for Drowning Persons? The Standard-Setting Potential of International Human Rights Litigation in Addressing Climate Displacement. In Yearbook of International Disaster Law 3: 238–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Fornalé .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Vido, S., Fornalé, E. (2023). Achievements and Hurdles Towards Women’s Access to Climate Justice. In: Fornalé, E., Cristani, F. (eds) Women’s Empowerment and Its Limits. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29332-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29332-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29331-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29332-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics