Abstract
This chapter argues that India’s continued insistence on framing Kashmir as its internal matter erases not only the long and complex history of international interventions in Kashmir but also the multiple shifts and contradictions of its own political approach toward Kashmir. In particular, we analyze how India’s interlocutory missions offered extra-constitutional means to “compensate” for the incremental attrition of Kashmiri political voice. Such procedural performances, or pretend “political listening” (Bassel, Leah. 2017. Why a Politics of Listening? In: The Politics of Listening. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137–53,167-4_1), upheld the facade of Indian democracy without disrupting or challenging India’s political agenda in Kashmir. In other words, state-mediated interlocutions constitute a form of symbolic violence that normalized the proceduralism of an occupying state and used humanist registers of inclusion and participation to erase the terrorizing face of the Indian occupation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Works Cited
Adelman, Susan. 2015. The Rebel: A Biography of Ram Jethmalani. Delhi: Penguin Press.
Banerji, Indranil. 2011. “Kashmir: A History of Failed Interlocutors.” Vivekananda International Foundation, March 25.
Bassel, Leah. 2017. “Why a Politics of Listening?” In The Politics of Listening. London: Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53167-4_1
Behera, Navnita Chadha. 2006. Demystifying Kashmir. Washington: Brookings Institute Press.
Bhan, Mona. 2014. Counterinsurgency, Development, and the Politics of Identity: From Warfare to Welfare? London: Routledge.
Business Standard. 2019. “Abrogation of J&K’s Special Status ‘aggression on state.’” NC. September 7. https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/abrogation-of-j-k-s-special-status-aggression-on-state-nc-119090700520_1.html
BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party). 2012. Jammu and Kashmir Interlocutors Report Weakens Constitutional Link between J&K and Rest of India. August. http://www.bjp.org/images/publications/jk_interlocutors_report.pdf
Bose, Sumantra. 2003. Kashmir: Roots of Conflict, Paths to Peace. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Chowdhary, Rekha. 2014. “India’s Response to the Kashmir Insurgency: A Holistic Perspective.” In Insurgency and Counter-Insurgency in South Asia, edited by Moeed Yusuf. Washington DC, United States Institute of Peace (USIP).
Deshpande, Rajeev. 2004. “First Ever Talks between Hurriyat, L. K. Advani End on Positive Note.” India Today, February 2. https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/nation/story/20040202-first-ever-meet-between-hurriyat-and-lk-advani-end-positive-790644-2004-02-02
Dixit, J.N. 2002. India Pakistan in War and Peace. London and NY: Routledge.
Dulat, A.S. 2015. Kashmir: The Vajpayee Years. India: Harper Collins.
Hussain, Altaf. 2006. “Kashmir Hardlines Refuse Talks.” BBC News, May 20.
Jaffrelot, Christophe, and Gilles Verniers. 2020. A New Party System or a New Political System? Contemporary South Asia 28 (2): 141–154.
Jaleel, Muzamil. 2013. “How New Delhi Manages Kashmir.” Indian Express, July 4.
Jethmalani, Ram. 2007. Conscience of a Maverick. Ubs Publishers.
Khan, Nyla Ali. 2018. Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah’s Reflections on Kashmir. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Khare, Harish. 2001. “Huriyat Plea: Pant Meets Vajpayee.” The Hindu, June 24.
Kumar, Radha. 2018. “How Manmohan Singh Embarked on a Mission of Peace in Kashmir from 2004 Onwards.” Scroll.in. November 27.
Lamb, Alastair. 1991. Kashmir: A Disputed Legacy, 1846–1990. England: Roxford Books.
Mullick, B.N. 1971. My Years with Nehru: Kashmir. Bombay, NY: Allied Publishers.
Narayanan, M.K. 2019. “Safeguarding Constitutional Morality.” The Hindu. December 24. https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/safeguarding-constitutional-morality/article30383084.ece
Noorani, A. G. 2016. “Vajpayee’s Insaniyat.” Frontline. September 30. https://frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/vajpayees-insaniyat/article9103651.ece
Outlook. 2001. “Doors Have Not Been Closed.” June 4.
Qasim, Sayyid Mir. 1992. My Life and Times. New Delhi: Allied Publishers Limited.
Rediff.com. 2001. “Why Should We Meet K.C. Pant?” April 4.
Rediff.com, 2003. “Advani to Head Talks with Hurriyat.” October 22. https://www.rediff.com/news/2003/oct/22ccs.htm
Schofield, Victoria. 2003. Kashmir in Conflict: India, Pakistan and the Unending War. London: I.B. Tauris.
Times of India. 2019. “Government Move on Article 370 ‘murder of democracy’, ‘attack on Indian Constitution’, Left Parties.” August 5.
Wahid, Siddiq. 2012. “A Schizophrenic Interlocution on Jammu & Kashmir.” Economic and Political Weekly 47 (26/27): 12–16.
Wani, Fayaz. 2017. “Kashmiri Separatists Reject Talks with Interlocutor.” The New Indian Express, October 31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhan, M., Duschinski, H. (2023). From Incorporation to Elimination: Interlocution as an Apparatus of Occupation in Kashmir. In: Duschinski, H., Bhan, M., Robinson, C.d. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of New Directions in Kashmir Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28520-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28520-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28519-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28520-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)