Abstract
Around the world, STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education and its variants (i.e., STEAM, STREAM) are at the forefront of educational conversations. At the heart of these conversations are questions of how to prepare future generations of scientists, STEM teachers, and citizen scientists in response to rapid economic and social challenges. In this chapter, the authors, serving as both instructors and researchers of STEM education in different education contexts in the U.S. and Turkey examine different STEM teacher preparation programs. Considering the broader international context, the authors engaged in dialogues and reflected on the need to prepare future STEM teachers to face wicked problems (Carter, Gathering in threads in the insensible global world: The wicked problem of globalization and science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(1), 1–12, 2011) in STEM education. These challenges are both localized and global where actors are entangled with other actors who are always and already in the milieu or “middle” (Deleuze & Guatarri, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum, 1987) of becoming Homo sapiens textilis, the human that knows it is interwoven (Jeong et al., The Anthropocene as we know it: Posthumanism, science education and scientific literacy as a path to sustainability. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(3), 805–820, 2021). Facing these challenges, we as STEM educators offer recommendations to not only educate future generations of STEM teachers and K-12 students in interdisciplinary way of thinking, but also thoughtfully consider what STEM education could become.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akaygun, S., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2020). Collaboratively learning to teach STEM: A model for learning to integrate STEM education in preservice teacher education. In V. L. Akerson & G. A. Buck (Eds.), Critical questions in STEM education (pp. 147–163). Springer.
Aksela, M., Lundell, J., & Ikävalko, T. (Eds.) (2020). LUMA Finland -Together we are more. LUMA Centre Finland. https://www.luma.fi/en/download/luma-finland-together-we-are-more/
Arslan, Ö. (2021). A different perspective on design-skill workshops and STEM education: Teachers’ opinions. Journal of STEM Teacher Institutes, 1(1), 58–65.
Ay, K., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2021). An investigation on various countries’ STEM education policies and implications for Turkey. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty., 23(1), 82–105.
Bakhtin, M. (1982). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. University of Texas Press.
Bannister, N. A. (2015). Reframing practice: Teacher learning through interactions in a collaborative group. Journal of the learning sciences, 24(3), 347–372.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Mesutoglu, C., & Ocak, C. (2016). Moving STEM beyond schools: Students’ perceptions about an out-of-school STEM education program. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 9–19.
Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 102–112.
Brandt, C. B. (2008). Discursive geographies in science: Space, identity, and scientific discourse among indigenous women in higher education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(3), 703–730.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association Press.
Cannady, M. A., Greenwald, E., & Harris, K. N. (2014). Problematizing the STEM pipeline metaphor: Is the STEM pipeline metaphor serving our students and the STEM workforce? Science Education, 98(3), 443–460.
Carter, L. (2011). Gathering in threads in the insensible global world: The wicked problem of globalisation and science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(1), 1–12.
Çınar, S., Pırasa, N., Uzun, N., & Erenler, S. (2016). The effect of STEM education on pre-service science teachers’ perception of interdisciplinary education. Journal of Turkish. Science Education, 13(special), 118–142.
Cohen, E., Hoz, R., & Kaplan, H. (2013). The practicum in preservice teacher education: a review of empirical studies. Teaching Education, 24(4), 345–380.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (n.d.). Standards in your State. Standards in Your State | Common Core State Standards Initiative. Retrieved February 26, 2022, from http://www.corestandards.org/standards-in-your-state/
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
Jeong, S. & Lewis, S. (In Press, 2022). Leveraging technology to foster high school students’ online presence and engagement as becomings: An integrated STEM lesson on trebuchet and parabolas. In F. Allaire & J. Killham (Eds.), Teaching and learning online: Science for secondary grade levels. Information Age Publishing.
Jeong, S., Sherman, B., & Tippins, D. J. (2021). The Anthropocene as we know it: Posthumanism, science education and scientific literacy as a path to sustainability. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(3), 805–820.
Jeong, S., Tippins, D. J., Haverkos, K., Kutner, M., Kayumova, S., & Britton, S. (2019). STEM education and the theft of futures of our youth: Some questions and challenges for educators. In Converting STEM into STEAM programs (pp. 285–305). Springer.
Johnson, C. C. (2013). Conceptualizing integrated STEM education. School Science and Mathematics, 113(8), 367–368.
Judson, E. (2013). The relationship between time allocated for science in elementary schools and state accountability policies. Science Education, 97, 621–636.
Kayacan, K., & Ozluleci, M. (2021). An analysis of the seventh-grade science textbook in terms of science, engineering and entrepreneurship applications. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 27, 319–345.
Lissitsa, S., & Chachashvili-Bolotin, S. (2021). Occupational reproduction and mobility in STEM–parental narratives of their child’s occupational choice. Educational Studies. Advance online publication.
McDonald, S., Bateman, K., & McCausland, J. (2020). Ch. 10: Practice-embedded methods courses for preservice teachers. In D. Stroupe, K. Hammerness, & S. McDonald (Eds.), Preparing science teachers through practice-based teacher education. Harvard Education Press.
Milner, A. R., Sondergeld, T. A., Demir, A., Johnson, C. C., & Czerniak, C. M. (2012). Elementary teachers’ beliefs about teaching science and classroom practice: An examination of pre/post NCLB testing in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(2), 111–132.
Ministry of National Education, MoNE. (2018). Science lesson curricula, elementary and middle school grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. (Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı.ilkokul ve ortaokul 3., 4., 5., 6., 7. ve 8. Sınıflar) Turkish Republic Ministry of Education (T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı). http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=325
Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In J. Strobel, S. Purzer, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in precollege settings: Research into practice (pp. 35–60). Sense Publishers.
National Science Teacher Association. (n.d.). About the next generation science standards. NGSS@NSTA. Retrieved February 26, 2022, from https://ngss.nsta.org/about.aspx
Patton, K., & Parker, M. (2017). Teacher education communities of practice: More than a culture of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 351–360.
Penfield, R. D., & Lee, O. (2010). Test-based accountability: Potential benefits and pitfalls of science assessment with student diversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 6–24.
Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2016). Investigating preservice STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 759–774.
Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Henriksson, H. W., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science Education Now: A New Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. European Commission Directorate General for Research Information and Communication Unit. Retrieved February 10, 2022, from https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/documents/rocard-report-science-education-now-new-pedagogy-future-europe
Sherman, B. J., Bateman, K. M., Jeong, S., & Hudock, L. A. (2021). Dialogic meta-ethnography: troubling methodology in ethnographically informed qualitative inquiry. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(1), 279–302.
Sondergeld, T. A., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Johnson, C. C. (2016). Integrating the three dimensions of next generation science standards: Issues and solutions for authentic assessment of student learning. School Science and Mathematics, 116(2), 67–70.
Tseng, F. C., & Kuo, F. Y. (2014). A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice. Computers & Education, 72, 37–47.
Turkish Higher Educational Council. (2018). New Curricula for the Teacher Education Bachelor Programs (Yeni Öğretmen Yetiştirme Lisans Programları). https://urldefense.com/v3/. https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari__;!!KGKeukY!lq8DdP2zp5XSXdMtIIUip_rxp6cSHMch_n5mtsk5bbPDyb9pBqCgeAzarGlAugYtkpI$
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Yamak, H., Bulut, N., & Dündar, S. (2014). The impact of STEM activities on 5th grade students’ scientific process skills and their attitudes towards science (5. Sınıf öğrencilerinin bilimsel süreç becerileri ile fene karşı tutumlarına FeTeMM etkinliklerinin etkisi) []. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 34(2), 249–265.
Yilmaz, A., Gülgün, C., Çetinkaya, M., & Doganay, K. (2018). Initiatives and new trends towards STEM education in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(11), 1–10.
Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jeong, S., Bateman, K.M., Akaygun, S., Aslan-Tutak, F., Şen-Akbulut, M., Safak, R.A. (2023). Entanglement of the United States and Turkish Science and Mathematics Educators Through the Lens of Becomings: Conceptualizing STEM Education Using a Bakhtinian Dialogic Approach. In: Al-Balushi, S.M., Martin-Hansen, L., Song, Y. (eds) Reforming Science Teacher Education Programs in the STEM Era. Palgrave Studies on Leadership and Learning in Teacher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27334-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27334-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27333-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27334-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)