Skip to main content

Entanglement of the United States and Turkish Science and Mathematics Educators Through the Lens of Becomings: Conceptualizing STEM Education Using a Bakhtinian Dialogic Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reforming Science Teacher Education Programs in the STEM Era

Abstract

Around the world, STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education and its variants (i.e., STEAM, STREAM) are at the forefront of educational conversations. At the heart of these conversations are questions of how to prepare future generations of scientists, STEM teachers, and citizen scientists in response to rapid economic and social challenges. In this chapter, the authors, serving as both instructors and researchers of STEM education in different education contexts in the U.S. and Turkey examine different STEM teacher preparation programs. Considering the broader international context, the authors engaged in dialogues and reflected on the need to prepare future STEM teachers to face wicked problems (Carter, Gathering in threads in the insensible global world: The wicked problem of globalization and science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(1), 1–12, 2011) in STEM education. These challenges are both localized and global where actors are entangled with other actors who are always and already in the milieu or “middle” (Deleuze & Guatarri, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum, 1987) of becoming Homo sapiens textilis, the human that knows it is interwoven (Jeong et al., The Anthropocene as we know it: Posthumanism, science education and scientific literacy as a path to sustainability. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(3), 805–820, 2021). Facing these challenges, we as STEM educators offer recommendations to not only educate future generations of STEM teachers and K-12 students in interdisciplinary way of thinking, but also thoughtfully consider what STEM education could become.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akaygun, S., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2020). Collaboratively learning to teach STEM: A model for learning to integrate STEM education in preservice teacher education. In V. L. Akerson & G. A. Buck (Eds.), Critical questions in STEM education (pp. 147–163). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aksela, M., Lundell, J., & Ikävalko, T. (Eds.) (2020). LUMA Finland -Together we are more. LUMA Centre Finland. https://www.luma.fi/en/download/luma-finland-together-we-are-more/

  • Arslan, Ö. (2021). A different perspective on design-skill workshops and STEM education: Teachers’ opinions. Journal of STEM Teacher Institutes, 1(1), 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ay, K., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2021). An investigation on various countries’ STEM education policies and implications for Turkey. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty., 23(1), 82–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. (1982). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, N. A. (2015). Reframing practice: Teacher learning through interactions in a collaborative group. Journal of the learning sciences, 24(3), 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Mesutoglu, C., & Ocak, C. (2016). Moving STEM beyond schools: Students’ perceptions about an out-of-school STEM education program. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, C. B. (2008). Discursive geographies in science: Space, identity, and scientific discourse among indigenous women in higher education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(3), 703–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannady, M. A., Greenwald, E., & Harris, K. N. (2014). Problematizing the STEM pipeline metaphor: Is the STEM pipeline metaphor serving our students and the STEM workforce? Science Education, 98(3), 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. (2011). Gathering in threads in the insensible global world: The wicked problem of globalisation and science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çınar, S., Pırasa, N., Uzun, N., & Erenler, S. (2016). The effect of STEM education on pre-service science teachers’ perception of interdisciplinary education. Journal of Turkish. Science Education, 13(special), 118–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., Hoz, R., & Kaplan, H. (2013). The practicum in preservice teacher education: a review of empirical studies. Teaching Education, 24(4), 345–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (n.d.). Standards in your State. Standards in Your State | Common Core State Standards Initiative. Retrieved February 26, 2022, from http://www.corestandards.org/standards-in-your-state/

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S. & Lewis, S. (In Press, 2022). Leveraging technology to foster high school students’ online presence and engagement as becomings: An integrated STEM lesson on trebuchet and parabolas. In F. Allaire & J. Killham (Eds.), Teaching and learning online: Science for secondary grade levels. Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S., Sherman, B., & Tippins, D. J. (2021). The Anthropocene as we know it: Posthumanism, science education and scientific literacy as a path to sustainability. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(3), 805–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S., Tippins, D. J., Haverkos, K., Kutner, M., Kayumova, S., & Britton, S. (2019). STEM education and the theft of futures of our youth: Some questions and challenges for educators. In Converting STEM into STEAM programs (pp. 285–305). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. C. (2013). Conceptualizing integrated STEM education. School Science and Mathematics, 113(8), 367–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judson, E. (2013). The relationship between time allocated for science in elementary schools and state accountability policies. Science Education, 97, 621–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayacan, K., & Ozluleci, M. (2021). An analysis of the seventh-grade science textbook in terms of science, engineering and entrepreneurship applications. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 27, 319–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissitsa, S., & Chachashvili-Bolotin, S. (2021). Occupational reproduction and mobility in STEM–parental narratives of their child’s occupational choice. Educational Studies. Advance online publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., Bateman, K., & McCausland, J. (2020). Ch. 10: Practice-embedded methods courses for preservice teachers. In D. Stroupe, K. Hammerness, & S. McDonald (Eds.), Preparing science teachers through practice-based teacher education. Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, A. R., Sondergeld, T. A., Demir, A., Johnson, C. C., & Czerniak, C. M. (2012). Elementary teachers’ beliefs about teaching science and classroom practice: An examination of pre/post NCLB testing in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(2), 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education, MoNE. (2018). Science lesson curricula, elementary and middle school grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. (Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı.ilkokul ve ortaokul 3., 4., 5., 6., 7. ve 8. Sınıflar) Turkish Republic Ministry of Education (T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı). http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=325

  • Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In J. Strobel, S. Purzer, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in precollege settings: Research into practice (pp. 35–60). Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teacher Association. (n.d.). About the next generation science standards. NGSS@NSTA. Retrieved February 26, 2022, from https://ngss.nsta.org/about.aspx

  • Patton, K., & Parker, M. (2017). Teacher education communities of practice: More than a culture of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, R. D., & Lee, O. (2010). Test-based accountability: Potential benefits and pitfalls of science assessment with student diversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 6–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2016). Investigating preservice STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 759–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Henriksson, H. W., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science Education Now: A New Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. European Commission Directorate General for Research Information and Communication Unit. Retrieved February 10, 2022, from https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/documents/rocard-report-science-education-now-new-pedagogy-future-europe

  • Sherman, B. J., Bateman, K. M., Jeong, S., & Hudock, L. A. (2021). Dialogic meta-ethnography: troubling methodology in ethnographically informed qualitative inquiry. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(1), 279–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sondergeld, T. A., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Johnson, C. C. (2016). Integrating the three dimensions of next generation science standards: Issues and solutions for authentic assessment of student learning. School Science and Mathematics, 116(2), 67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, F. C., & Kuo, F. Y. (2014). A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice. Computers & Education, 72, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Higher Educational Council. (2018). New Curricula for the Teacher Education Bachelor Programs (Yeni Öğretmen Yetiştirme Lisans Programları). https://urldefense.com/v3/. https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari__;!!KGKeukY!lq8DdP2zp5XSXdMtIIUip_rxp6cSHMch_n5mtsk5bbPDyb9pBqCgeAzarGlAugYtkpI$

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yamak, H., Bulut, N., & Dündar, S. (2014). The impact of STEM activities on 5th grade students’ scientific process skills and their attitudes towards science (5. Sınıf öğrencilerinin bilimsel süreç becerileri ile fene karşı tutumlarına FeTeMM etkinliklerinin etkisi) []. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 34(2), 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, A., Gülgün, C., Çetinkaya, M., & Doganay, K. (2018). Initiatives and new trends towards STEM education in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(11), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophia Jeong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jeong, S., Bateman, K.M., Akaygun, S., Aslan-Tutak, F., Şen-Akbulut, M., Safak, R.A. (2023). Entanglement of the United States and Turkish Science and Mathematics Educators Through the Lens of Becomings: Conceptualizing STEM Education Using a Bakhtinian Dialogic Approach. In: Al-Balushi, S.M., Martin-Hansen, L., Song, Y. (eds) Reforming Science Teacher Education Programs in the STEM Era. Palgrave Studies on Leadership and Learning in Teacher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27334-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27334-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27333-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27334-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics