Abstract
Accurate autonomous navigation for off-terrain utility vehicles with no human intervention is an essential requirement to achieve full automation. Within several applications, though higher autonomous navigational accuracy (almost ±2.5 cm) has been achieved in some commercially available vehicles yet requirements for human intervention is still very much required in several situations. This study investigates autonomous navigational accuracy of PurePursuit algorithm for different reference points for a non-steerable-wheels center-steered articulated vehicle. PurePursuit algorithm is preferable choice for path tracking for its simplicity and for vehicles where high speed is not a requirement. Evaluation of PurePursuit algorithm for utility vehicles of type studied in this paper is somewhat less explored area. We have compared the autonomous navigational accuracy of PurePursuit algorithm for different reference points for a set of different path complexities that also includes vehicles kinematic constraints in simulation environment. Average lateral and heading deviations were calculated for a set of different path complexities, and it was found that in general proposed reference point for PurePursuit algorithm for center-steer articulated vehicle shows better lateral and heading autonomous navigational accuracy than the traditional PurePursuit algorithm.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amidi, O., Thorpe, C.E.: Integrated mobile robot control. In: Mobile Robots V, vol. 1388, pp. 504–523. SPIE (1991). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.25494
Coulter, R.C.: Implementation of the pure pursuit path tracking algorithm. Carnegie-Mellon UNIV Pittsburgh PA Robotics INST (1992)
Fue, K., et al.: Autonomous navigation of a center-articulated and hydrostatic transmission rover using a modified pure pursuit algorithm in a cotton field. Sensors 20(16), 4412 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164412
Hellstrom, T., Ringdahl, O.: Follow the past: a path-tracking algorithm for autonomous vehicles. Int. J. Veh. Auton. Syst. 4(2–4), 216–224 (2006)
Jeong, Y., et al.: Model predictive control based path tracking and velocity control with rollover prevention function for autonomous electric road sweeper. Energies 15(3), 984 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030984
Martínez, J.L., et al.: Path tracking for mobile robots with a trailer. IFAC Proc. Vol. 35(1), 329–334 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3182/20020721-6-ES-1901.00867
Murillo, M., et al.: Improving path-tracking performance of an articulated tractor-trailer system using a non-linear kinematic model. Comput. Electron. Agric. 196, 106826 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106826
Nayl, T., et al.: Design and experimental evaluation of a novel sliding mode controller for an articulated vehicle. Robot. Auton. Syst. 103, 213–221 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2018.01.006
Nayl, T.: Modeling, control and path planning for an articulated vehicle. Luleå (2013)
Polotski, V.: New reference point for guiding an articulated vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37162), pp. 455–460. (2000)
Rains, G.C.: Evaluation of a simple pure pursuit path-following algorithm for an autonomous, articulated-steer vehicle. Appl. Eng. Agric. 30(3), 367–374 (2014). https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.30.10347
Shao, J., et al.: Reinforcement learning algorithm for path following control of articulated vehicle. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 48(3), 376–382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2017.03.048
Tian, J., et al.: Active steering control based on preview theory for articulated heavy vehicles. PLoS ONE 16(5), e0252098 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252098
Wallace, R., et al.: First results in robot road-following. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 1089–1095, Los Angeles, California (1985)
Wang, L., et al.: An improved pure pursuit path tracking control method based on heading error rate. Ind. Rob. Int. J. Rob. Res. Appl. 49(5), 973–980 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/IR-11-2021-0257
Yang, Y., et al.: An optimal goal point determination algorithm for automatic navigation of agricultural machinery: improving the tracking accuracy of the Pure Pursuit algorithm. Comput. Electron. Agric. 194, 106760 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106760
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by The Royal Swedish Agricultural Academy (SLO-foundation).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Latif, S., Lindbäck, T., Karlberg, M. (2023). Evaluation of Autonomous Navigational Accuracy for Different Reference Points in PurePursuit Algorithm for Center-Steered Articulated Vehicles. In: Jo, J., et al. Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications 7. RiTA 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 642. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26889-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26889-2_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26888-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26889-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)