Skip to main content
  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

This article proposes a lens to understand and contextualise the emergence of the participatory claim, to situate its specificity in relation to the model of representative democracy and also with regard to other models based on critique of this model. It highlights the importance of Jurgen Habermas’s thinking which questions the tension and articulation between participative and deliberative democracies. It then describes both its successes and critiques but also the spread of the participatory model in spheres extending largely beyond politics, especially its impact on the economic and entrepreneurial realms and that of the new social movements. It then shows how the rise of ecological thinking has found it to be a natural ally but also how it has helped redefine it, especially by redesigning the limits of the community and its legitimate ‘participants’ and by requiring a renewal of the articulations between participation and representation.

Translation by Gail Ann Fagen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the entry “anthropological mutations”.

References

  • Berger, M. (2017). Vers une théorie du pâtir communicationnel. Sensibiliser Habermas. Cahiers de recherche sociologique, 62, 69–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantelli, F. (2013). Deux conceptions de l’empowerment. Politique et Sociétés. 32(1), 63–87. doi: doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/1018721ar. Accessed 23 February 2020.

  • Cantelli, F., & Genard, J.-L. (2008). Etres capables et compétents: Lecture anthropologique et pistes pragmatiques, Sociologie S. https://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/1943. Accessed 12 May 2019.

  • Cohen, J. (1996). Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 95–119). Princeton.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa Santos, B. (2002). Democratizar a Democracia: Os caminhos da democracia participativa. Civilização Brasileira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B., & de Geus, M. (Eds.). (1996). Democracy and green political thought. Sustainability, rights and citizenship. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (2004). The green state: Rethinking democracy and sovereignty. The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreras, I. (2012). Gouverner le capitalisme ? Pour le bicamérisme économique. Presses universitaires de France.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Genard, J.-L. (2020). Un bouleversement radical de nos repères anthropologiques et des conditions de la moralité: le déclin ou la fin de l’exception humaine ?, Sociologie S. http://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/13202. Accessed 13 June 2020.

  • Genard, J.-L., & Cantelli, F. (2010). Pour une sociologie politique des compétences. Les politiques sociales, 1(2), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. E. (1996). Designing constitutions: The political constitution of a mixed commonwealth. Political Studies, XLIV, 635–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. The MIT Press. (Original German edition 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification. The MIT Press. (Original German edition 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. The MIT Press. (Original German edition 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility. In Search of an ethics for the technological age. The University of Chicago Press. (Original German edition 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1996). An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge University Press. (Original German edition 1784).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manin, B. (1985). Volonté générale ou délibération. Esquisse d’une théorie de la délibération politique. Le Débat, 33(1), 72–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, C., Pierre, L., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world an essay on technical democracy (G. Burchell, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original French version 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Reybrouck, D. (2016). Against elections: The case for democracy. Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Louis Genard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Genard, JL. (2023). Participation. In: Wallenhorst, N., Wulf, C. (eds) Handbook of the Anthropocene. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25910-4_208

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics