Skip to main content
  • 57 Accesses

Abstract

This article proposes to tackle our entry into Anthropocene as an observable phenomenon not only through its effects, chiefly on the composition of the atmosphere and the disappearance of biodiversity, but also through its key factor: the process of industrialization of human activities. We owe our entry into this new era to new social entities that we have recently engendered: modern organizations on which we now depend to meet our vital and social needs, and which meanwhile endanger our own survival. Are these organizations the result of an improvement of what previously existed or do they represent a break in our history? Depending on the response to this question, the diagnosis and remedies will be different.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. In Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U. (1986). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Ritter, M. Trans). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012). The dynamics of standardization: Three perspectives on standards in organization studies. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 613–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, Organizing and Organization: An Overview and Introduction to the Special Issue. Organization Studies (01708406), 32(9), 1149–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, J.-P. (2012). L’avenir de l’économie. Sortir de l’économystification. Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline & Punish: The birth of the prison, 2d édition, Vintage (First edition in french: 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fressoz, J.-B. (2012). L’apocalypse joyeuse. Une histoire du risque technologique. Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of Structuration. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harari, Y. N., & Sapiens, A. (2014). A brief history of humankind. Publish in agreement with The Deborah Harris Agency and the Grayhawk Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, F. (1970). La logique du vivant. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnunen, J. (1996). Gabriel Tarde as a Founding Father of Innovation Diffusion Research. Acta Sociologica (Taylor & Francis Ltd), 39(4), 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclouf, E. (2020). Pourquoi les organisations industrielles ne sauveront pas la planète. Ou l’anti manuel de la RSE et du développement durable., Le Bord de l’Eau, (En Anthropocène).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1997). Organizing for environmental destruction, 10(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., & Greenwood, R. (2021). Proudly elitist and undemocratic? The distributed maintenance of contested practices. Organization Studies, 42(1), 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachse, C. (2011). Philosophie de la biologie. Presses Polytechniques et Univ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarde, G. (1895). Les Lois de l’imitation. Kimé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taupin, B. (2012). The more things change… Institutional maintenance as justification work in the credit rating industry. Management, 15(5), 529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. Prlimpton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley, B. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 518–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, E. J. (2005). The persistence of bureaucracy: A meta-analysis of Weber’s model of bureaucratic control. Organization Studies, 26(4), 569–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etienne Maclouf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maclouf, E. (2023). Industry. In: Wallenhorst, N., Wulf, C. (eds) Handbook of the Anthropocene. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25910-4_189

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics