Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Analytics Framework Applied to Training Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education (TECH-EDU 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1720))

Abstract

Currently, business organizations are struggling with the increasing demand for learning needs to address their knowledge gaps. They must have a structure that can reach all employees in terms of training and extract all the important data which is collected by Learning Management Systems during the instruction or learning process. This data will be of extreme importance for better business decisions. In this paper, it is presented a Systematic Literature Review with their respective phases duly explained and framed in the topic. It allowed us to understand the benefits, challenges, enablers, and inhibitors of the deployment and usage of a specified Teaching-Learning Analytics Framework. Finally, it is concluded, that the development of a reference model, could fulfill this gap in knowledge and help business organizations to allocate resources better and improve the decision-making process as well as an instructional and learning process. To achieve the final goal of this research, future work about the development of a Survey Research methodology will be started to fulfill this gap of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alavi, M., Leidner, D.: Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges, and benefits. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 1, 7 (1999). https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.00107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grant, R.M.: Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. 7(4), 375–387 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.4.375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, M.: Learning analytics: moving from concept to practice. In: EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative Brief (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. AlHunaiyyan, A., AlSharhan, S., AlHajri, R.: Prospects and challenges of learning management systems in higher education. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. App. 11(12), 73–79 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0111209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blackmon, S.J., Moore, R.L.: A framework to support interdisciplinary engagement with learning analytics. In: Ifenthaler, D., Gibson, D. (eds.) Adoption of Data Analytics in Higher Education Learning and Teaching. Advances in Analytics for Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-03047392-1_3

  6. Basak, S.K., Wotto, M., Bélanger, P.: E-learning, m-learning and d-learning: conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learn. Digit. Media 15(4), 191–216 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, K.C.: The evolution of open learning: A review of the transition from pre-e-learning to the era of e-learning. Knowl. Manage. E-Learn. 10(4), 408–425 (2018). https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2018.10.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Noesgaard, S.S., Ørngreen, R.: The effectiveness of e-learning: an explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-Learning effectiveness. Electron. J. e-Learn. 13(4), 278–290 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edmondson, A., Moingeon, B.: From organizational learning to the learning organization. Manage. Learn. 29(1), 5–20 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507698291001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Jesus Ginja Antunes, H., Pinheiro, P.G.: Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. J. Innov. Knowl. 5(2), 140–149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.002

  11. Shurygin, V., Saenko, N., Zekiy, A., Klochko, E., Kulapov, M.: Learning management systems in academic and corporate distance education. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 16(11), 121 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i11.20701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yilmaz, F., Çakir, H.: Learning analytics and potential usage areas in education. J. Learn. Teach. Digit. Age 6(2), 81–89 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jabareen, Y.: Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. In. J. Qual. Methods 8(4), 49–62 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. In: Keele University, UK and National ICT Australia, vol. 33 (2004). 10.1.1.122.3308

    Google Scholar 

  15. Christopoulos, A., Pellas, N., Laakso, M.J.: A learning analytics theoretical framework for stem education virtual reality applications. Educ. Sci. 10(11), 1–15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen, V.A., Nguyen, Q.B., Nguyen, V.T.: A model to forecast learning outcomes for students in blended learning courses based on learning analytics. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 35–41 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3268808.3268827

  17. Olivé, D.M., Huynh, D.Q., Reynolds, M., Dougiamas, M., Wiese, D.: A supervised learning framework for learning management systems. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 1–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3279996.3280014

  18. Gkontzis, A.F., Kotsiantis, S., Tsoni, R., Verykios, V.S.: An effective LA approach to predict student achievement. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 76–81 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3291533.3291551

  19. Ogata, H., Majumdar, R., Akçapinar, G., Hasnine, M.N., Flanagan, B.: Beyond Learning Analytics: Framework for Technology-Enhanced Evidence-Based Education and Learning. http://evidence.laceproject.eu/ (2018)

  20. Shettar, A., Vijaylakshmi, M., Tewari, P.: Categorizing student as a convergent and divergent thinker in problem-solving using learning analytics framework. Procedia Comput. Sci. 172, 803–810 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gorbunovs, A., Timsans, Z., Zuga, B., Zagorskis, V.: Conceptual design of the newgeneration adaptive learning management system. www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/IJET (2018)

  22. Hamid, S., Ismail, S.N., Hamzah, M., Malik, A.W.: Developing engagement in the learning management system supported by learning analytics. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 42(1), 335–350 (2022). https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2022.021927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dawson, S., Jovanovic, J., Gašević, D., Pardo, A.: From prediction to impact: Evaluation of a learning analytics retention program. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 474–478 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027405

  24. Le, M.D., Nguyen, H.H., Nguyen, D.L.. Nguyen, V.A.: How to forecast the students’ learning outcomes based on factors of interactive activities in a blended learning course. In: Pervasive Health: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 11–15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3404709.3404711

  25. Sciarrone, F., Temperini, M.: Learning analytics models: a brief review. Proc. Int. Conf. Inform. Visualisation 2019, 287–291 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2019.00055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., Gasevic, D.: Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: the effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet High. Educ. 28, 68–84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Miranda, S., Vegliante, R.: Learning analytics to support learners and teachers: the navigation among contents as a model to adopt. J. E-Learn. Knowl. Soc. 15(3), 101–116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Falcão, T.P., Mello, R.F., Rodrigues, R.L., Diniz, J.R.B., Tsai, Y.S., Gaševic, D.: Perceptions and expectations about learning analytics from a Brazilian higher education institution. In: PervasiveHealth: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 240–249 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375478

  29. KaraoglanYilmaz, F.G., Yilmaz, R.: Student opinions about personalized recommendation and feedback based on learning analytics. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 25(4), 753–768 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09460-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tempelaar, D.T., Rienties, B., Nguyen, Q.: Towards actionable learning analytics using dispositions. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10(1), 6–16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2662679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wong, W.Y., Lavrencic, M.: Using a risk management approach in analytics for curriculum and program quality improvement. In: PCLA 2016 – Proceedings 1st Learning Analytics for Curriculum and Program Quality Improvement Workshop, co-located with 6th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, LAK 2016. Rheinisch-Westfaelische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Froissard, J.-C., Liu, D., Richards, D., Atif, A.: A learning analytics pilot in Moodle and its impact on developing organisational capacity in a university. In: Ascilite 2017 University of Southern Queensland 1 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Quick, J., Motz, B., Israel, J., Kaetzel, J.: What college students say, and what they do: Aligning self-regulated learning theory with behavioral logs. In: PervasiveHealth: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 534–543 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375516

  34. Borges, V.A., Nogueira, B.M., Barbosa, E.F.: A multidimensional data model for the analysis of learning management systems under different perspectives. In: Proceedings - Frontiers in https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757743

  35. Lancaster, A., Moses, S., Clark, M., Masters, M.C.: The positive impact of deliberate writing course design on student learning experience and performance. J. Learn. Analytics 7(3), 48–63 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18608/JLA.2020.73.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Saint, J., Gaševic, D., Matcha, W., Uzir, N.A.A., Pardo, A.: Combining analytic methods to unlock sequential and temporal patterns of self-regulated learning. In: PervasiveHealth: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 402–411 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375487

  37. Santos, A.C., Iglesias Rodríguez, A., Pinto-Llorente, A.M.: Identification of characteristics and functionalities for the design of an academic analytics model for Higher Education. In: PervasiveHealth: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 997–1003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436578

  38. Glasow, P.A.: Fundamentals of Survey Research Methodology April 2005. Virginia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sue, V.,Ritter, L.: Conducting Online Surveys. SAGE Publications, Inc. (2011). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983754

  40. Quivy, R., van Campenhoudt, L.: Manual de investigação em ciências sociais. Vasa (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

    João Dias

  2. Department of Sciences and Technologies, Open University, Lisbon, Portugal

    João Dias & Arnaldo Santos

Authors
  1. João Dias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arnaldo Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Dias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal

    Arsénio Reis

  2. University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal

    João Barroso

  3. University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal

    Paulo Martins

  4. University of Peloponnese, Tripoli, Greece

    Athanassios Jimoyiannis

  5. National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan

    Ray Yueh-Min Huang

  6. Nova IMS, Lisbon, Portugal

    Roberto Henriques

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dias, J., Santos, A. (2022). Learning Analytics Framework Applied to Training Context. In: Reis, A., Barroso, J., Martins, P., Jimoyiannis, A., Huang, R.YM., Henriques, R. (eds) Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education. TECH-EDU 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1720. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22918-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22918-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22917-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22918-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation