Skip to main content

Structuring Collaborative Setting in the Learner Centered Learning Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education (TECH-EDU 2022)

Abstract

In computer supported collaborative settings there is a need to structure collaboration in order to foster productive interactions. In the Learner centered Learning (LcL) environment, which is an activity-oriented learning environment, the structuring of collaborative setting addresses issues related to the formation and collaboration model followed by the groups and to the structuring of the dialogue. The communication tool supports both the free and the structured form with different scaffolding communication means. The teacher can adapt the collaborative setting, i.e. the model of collaboration and the communication tool according to the collaborative activity designed. The results of the preliminary study conducted, revealed that the students used the structured form adequately resulting into more coherent conversations and they acknowledge the added value of the structured form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baeten, M., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., Parmentier, E., Vanderbruggen, A.: Student-centred learning environments: an investigation into student teachers’ instructional preferences and approaches to learning. Learning Environ. Res. 19(1), 43–62 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9190-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aguti, B., Walters, R., Wills, G.: Effective use of e-learning technologies to promote student-centered learning paradigms within higher education institutions. Int. J. for e-Learning Security (IJeLS) 4(2), 391–398 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schreurs, J., Dumbraveanu, R.: A shift from teacher centered to learner centered approach. Int. J. Eng. Pedagogy 4(3), 36–41 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Soller, A.: Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 12, 40–62 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., Suthers, D.: Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In: Andriessen, J., Baker, M., Suthers, D. (eds.) Arguing to Learn. Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments, pp. 1–25. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jermann, J., Soller, A., Lesgold A.: Computer software support for CSCL. In: Strijbos, J.W., Kirschner, P.A., Martens, L., (eds.) What we know about CSCL and Implementing it in Higher Education, pp. 141–166. Kluwer Academic Publisher (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dillenbourg, P.: Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: Kirschner, P. A. (ed.) Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL, pp. 61–91. Heerlen, Open Universiteit Nederlands (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ravenscroft, A.: Promoting thinking and conceptual change with digital dialogue games. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 23(6), 453–465 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsu, C.C., Chiu, C.H., Lin, C.H., Wang, T.I.: Enhancing skill in constructing scientific explanations using a structured argumentation scaffold in scientific inquiry. Comput. Educ. 91, 46–59 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeong, A.: The combined effects of response time and message content on group interactions in computer supported collaborative argumentation. J. Dist. Educ. 19, 36–53 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ak, Ş: The role of technology-based scaffolding in problem-based online asynchronous discussion. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 47(4), 680–693 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Avcı, Ü.: Examining the role of sentence openers, role assignment scaffolds and self-determination in collaborative knowledge building. Education Tech. Research Dev. 68(1), 109–135 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09672-5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosatelli, M., Self, J.A.: Collaborative case study system for distance learning. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 14, 97–125 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jermann, P.: Structuring and regulating collaborative interaction by semi-structured interfaces and interaction meters. In: Presented at the workshop on Analysing Educational Dialogue Interaction, AIED 99 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lazonder, A., Wilhelm, P., Ootes, S.: Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments. Comput. Educ. 41, 291–308 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baker, M., Lund, K.: Promoting reflective interactions in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 13(3), 175–193 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Robertson, J., Good, J., Pain, H.: BetterBlether: the design and evaluation of a discussion tool for education. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 9, 219–236 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gogoulou, A.: Interweaving activities, feedback and learner model in a learner centered learning Environment. In: Kumar, V., Troussas, C. (eds.) ITS 2020. LNCS, vol. 12149, pp. 280–283. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Gogoulou, A., Gouli, E., Grigoriadou, M.: Adapting and personalizing the communication in a synchronous communication tool. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 24, 203–216 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tchounikine, P.: Learners’ agency and CSCL technologies: towards an emancipatory perspective. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 14(2), 237–250 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09302-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Herberg, J.S., Yengin, I., Satkunarajah, P., Tan, M.: Boosting knowledge-building with cognitive dialog games. In: Gunzelmann, G., Howes, A., Tenbrink, T., Davelaar, E.J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2199–2204. Cognitive Science Society, London, Austin, TX (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Othlinghaus-Wulhorst, J., Mainz, A., Hoppe, H.U.: Training customer complaint management in a virtual role-playing game: a user study. In: European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, pp. 436–449. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agoritsa Gogoulou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gogoulou, A., Triantafyllou, K., Grigoriadou, M., Tsalgatidou, A. (2022). Structuring Collaborative Setting in the Learner Centered Learning Environment. In: Reis, A., Barroso, J., Martins, P., Jimoyiannis, A., Huang, R.YM., Henriques, R. (eds) Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education. TECH-EDU 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1720. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22918-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22918-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22917-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22918-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics