Abstract
Purchasing decisions can greatly influence the sustainability performance of organizations. Large organizations, including many Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), have decentralized purchasing systems in which purchasing authority is widely distributed among many employees. Managing sustainability of procurement activities in these contexts is challenging since the outcome is dependent on the purchasing behaviors of many individuals. This study sought to explain the roles of behavioral attitudes and social norms in employee purchasing decisions for copy paper products. Employees at a major US university who purchased paper products were selected to participate in the study by completing an online questionnaire. Within the sustainable supply chain management and procurement fields of study, little research has been published on the impact of minor procurement on the sustainability performance of organizations. Likewise, little research has been dedicated to the purchasing decisions of staff level employees, with the bulk instead focused on senior level organizational buyers and supply managers. This research highlights the roles of administrative support employees and minor procurement decisions in sustainable supply chain management strategies of large organizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrahamse W, Steg L (2009) How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? J Econ Psychol 30(5):711–720
Aguinis H, Glavas A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. J Manag 38(4):932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Action control. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 11–39
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211
Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (2021) STARS report content
Bachmann F, Hanimann A, Artho J, Jonas K (2018) What drives people to carpool? Explaining carpooling intention from the perspectives of carpooling passengers and drivers. Transport Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 59:260–268
Boström M (2015) Between monitoring and trust: commitment to extended upstream responsibility. J Bus Ethics 131(1):239–255
Crowson M (2021) Testing specific indirect effects via user defined estimands in AMOS
Environmental Paper Network (2018) The state of the global paper industry
Fielding KS, McDonald R, Louis WR (2008a) Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. J Environ Psychol 28(4):318–326
Fielding KS, Terry DJ, Masser BM, Hogg MA (2008b) Integrating social identity theory and the theory of planned behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices. Br J Soc Psychol 47(1):23–48
Fishbein M (1963) An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Hum Relat 16:233–240
Fishbein M (1967) Readings in attitude theory and measurement. Wiley, New York
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2009) Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis
Graham-Rowe E, Jessop DC, Sparks P (2015) Predicting household food waste reduction using an extended theory of planned behaviour. Resour Conserv Recycl 101:194–202
Haake H, Seuring S (2009) Sustainable procurement of minor items—exploring limits to sustainability. Sustain Dev 17(5):284–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.424
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2009) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
Han H, Hsu LTJ, Sheu C (2010) Application of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice: testing the effect of environmental friendly activities. Tour Manage 31(3):325–334
Heath Y, Gifford R (2002) Extending the theory of planned behavior: predicting the use of public transportation 1. J Appl Soc Psychol 32(10):2154–2189
Hu L, Bentler P (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6(1):1–55
Kim YJ, Njite D, Hancer M (2013) Anticipated emotion in consumers’ intentions to select eco-friendly restaurants: augmenting the theory of planned behavior. Int J Hosp Manag 34:255–262
Kraljic P (1983) Purchasing must become supply management. Harv Bus Rev 61(5):109–117
Krause DR, Vachon S, Klassen RD (2009) Special topic forum on sustainable supply chain management: introduction and reflections on the role of purchasing management. J Supply Chain Manag Glob Rev Purch Supply 45(4):18–25
Kumar A, Smith S (2018) Understanding local food consumers: theory of planned behavior and segmentation approach. J Food Prod Mark 24(2):196–215
Li L, Geiser K (2005) Environmentally responsible public procurement (ERPP) and its implications for integrated product policy (IPP). J Clean Prod 13(7):705–715
Martinho G, Pires A, Portela G, Fonseca M (2015) Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 103:58–68
Martins CL, Pato MV (2019) Supply chain sustainability: a tertiary literature review. J Clean Prod 225:995–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.250
Miemczyk J, Johnsen T, Macquet M (2012) Sustainable purchasing and supply management: a Structured literature review of definitions and measures at the dyad, chain and network levels. Supply Chain Manag Int J 17(5):478–496
Moser AK (2015) Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro-environmental purchasing behavior. J Consum Mark 32(3):167–175
Mosgaard M, Riisgaard H, Huulgaard RD (2013) Greening non-product-related procurement–when policy meets reality. J Clean Prod 39:137–145
Mosgaard MA (2015) Improving the practices of green procurement of minor items. J Clean Prod 90:264–274
National Association of Educational Procurement (2016) Green procurement survey report
Norton TA, Parker SL, Zacher H, Ashkanasy NM (2015) Employee green behavior: a theoretical framework, multilevel review, and future research agenda. Organ Environ 28(1):103–125
OECD (2017) OECD guidelines on measuring the quality of the working environment. OECD Publishing, Paris
Oluka OC, Nie S, Sun Y (2014) Quality assessment of TPB-based questionnaires: a systematic review. PloS One 9(4)
Philippart M (2016) The procurement dilemma: short-term savings or long-term shareholder value? J Bus Strategy 37(6):10–17
Princeton University (2004) University switches to recycled paper. Princeton Weekly Bulletin
Rajeev A, Pati RK, Padhi SS, Govindan K (2017) Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: a literature review. J Clean Prod 162:299–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.026
Rupp DE, Mallory DB (2015) Corporate social responsibility: psychological, person-centric, and progressing. Annu Rev Organ Psych Organ Behav 2(1):211–236. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111505
Sánchez-Rodríguez C, Martínez-Lorente ÁR (2004) Quality management practices in the purchasing function: an empirical study. Int J Oper Prod Manag 24(7):666–687
Schuhwerk ME, Lefkoff-Hagius R (1995) Green or non-green? Does type of appeal matter when advertising a green product? J Advert 24(2):45–54
Sheth SS (2018) Identifying and mitigating maverick spend at Penn State Purchasing Services. Master’s thesis, Pennsylvania State University. Penn State Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Skene J, Vinyard S (2019) The Issue with tissue: how Americans are flushing forests down the toilet. National Resource Defense Council. R: 19-01-A
Swaim JA, Maloni MJ, Henley A, Campbell S (2016) Motivational influences on supply manager environmental sustainability behavior. Supply Chain Manag Int J 21(3):305–320
Tonglet M, Phillips PS, Read AD (2004) Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK. Resour Conserv Recycl 41(3):191–214
Touboulic A, Walker H (2015) Theories in sustainable supply chain management: a structured literature review. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 45(1–2):16–42
Van Leuvan N, Highleyman L, Kibe A, Cole E (2019) Turning the page: a behavior change toolkit for reducing paper use. Root Solutions and Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education
Wei C-F, Chiang C-T, Kou T-C, Lee BCY (2017) Toward sustainable livelihoods: investigating the drivers of purchase behavior for green products. Bus Strat Env 26:626–639
World Wide Fund For Nature (2015) WWF has developed the Certification Assessment Tool (CAT) to test the strength of certification systems and their standards. World Wide Fund For Nature
Yazdanpanah M, Forouzani M (2015) Application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict Iranian students’ intention to purchase organic food. J Clean Prod 107:342–352
Yeon Kim H, Chung JE (2011) Consumer purchase intention for organic personal care products. J Consum Mark 28(1):40–47
Young W, Hwang K, McDonald S, Oates CJ (2010) Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustain Dev 18(1):20–31
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elser, N., Michael, J. (2023). Sustainability in Higher Education Procurement: The Role of Employee Paper Purchasing Decisions. In: Leal Filho, W., Lange Salvia, A., Pallant, E., Choate, B., Pearce, K. (eds) Educating the Sustainability Leaders of the Future. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22856-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22856-8_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22855-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22856-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)