Abstract
Emergent leadership refers to the dynamic by which, when there is no appointed leader in a group, one or more members assume leadership behaviors. Understanding emergent leadership in task-oriented human-machine teams is critical to optimize the role and input of machine agents. We find, however, a dearth of measures of emergent leadership to guide the development of machine agents. Here we describe the initial development of peer-report and natural language processing (NLP) -derived measurement techniques for indexing emergent leadership in a team context, rooted in the leaderplex model (Denison et al. 1995; Quinn 1984); we take a behavioral approach to indexing emergent leadership which emphasizes the diverse functions of leaders in the team context. We describe initial evidence of validity, areas of further exploration, and implications for human-machine teams. Overall, we find good concordance between peer-report measures of leadership behaviors and peer-report identification of emergent leaders, as well as with initial NLP behavioral marker extractions. Our mixed-method approach presents a first step in developing language-derived computational methods to enhance machine agent artificial social intelligence and theory of mind, ultimately improving their effectiveness in human-machine teams.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bono, J.E., Judge, T.A.: Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 89(5), 901–910 (2004)
Carson, J.B., Tesluk, P.E., Marrone, J.A.: Shared leadership in teams: an investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 50(5), 1217–1234 (2007)
Carte, T.A., Becker, A.: Emergent leadership in self-managed virtual teams: a replication. AIS Trans. Replication Res. 3(5), 1–10 (2006)
Carte, T.A., Chidambaram, L., Becker, A.: Emergent leadership in self-managed virtual teams: a longitudinal study of concentrated and shared leadership behaviors. Group Decis. Negot. 15(4), 323–343 (2006)
Cogliser, C.C., Gardner, W.L., Gavin, M.B., Broberg, J.C.: Big Five personality factors and leader emergence in virtual teams: relationships with team trustworthiness, member performance contributions, and team performance. Group Org. Manag. 37(6), 752–784 (2012)
Cohen, S.G., Bailey, D.E.: What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Manag. 23(3), 239–290 (1997)
Day, D.V., Gronn, P., Salas, E.: Leadership capacity in teams. Leadersh. Q. 15(6), 857–880 (2004)
Denison, D.R., Hooijberg, R., Quinn, R.E.: Paradox and performance: toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organ. Sci. 6(5), 524–540 (1995)
Dulebohn, J.H., Hoch, J.E.: Virtual teams in organizations. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 27(4), 569–574 (2017)
Gerpott, F.H., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Voelpel, S.C., van Vugt, M.: It’s not just what is said, but when it’s said: a temporal account of verbal behaviors and emergent leadership in self-managed teams. Acad. Manag. J. 62(3), 717–738 (2019)
Hoyt, C.L., Blascovich, J.: Transformational and transactional leadership in virtual and physical environments. Small Group Res. 34(6), 678–715 (2003)
Kalma, A.P., Visser, L., Peeters, A.: Sociable and aggressive dominance: personality differences in leadership style? Leadersh. Q. 4, 45–64 (1993)
Kozlowski, S.W.J., Gully, S.M., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A.: Team leadership and development: theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams. In: Beyerlein, M.M., Johnson, D.A., Beyerlein, S.T. (eds.) Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Team Leadership, vol. 3, pp. 253–291. Elsevier Science/JAI Press (1996)
Linacre, J.: What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Meas. Transm. 16(2), 878 (2002)
O’Connell, M.S., Doverspike, D., Cober, A.B.: Leadership and semiautonomous work team performance: a field study. Group Org. Manag. 27, 50–65 (2002)
Quinn, R.E.: Applying the competing values approach to leadership: toward and integrative model. In: Hunt, J.G., Stewart, R., Schriesheim, C., Hosking, D. (eds.) Managers and Leaders: An International Perspective. Pergamon, New York (1984)
Stout, R.J., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., Milanovich, D.M.: Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: an empirical link is established. Hum. Factors 41, 61–71 (1999)
Valenzuela-Escárcega, M.A., Hahn-Powell, G., Surdeanu, M.: Description of the Odin Event Extraction Framework and Rule Language. arxiv:1509.07513 (2015)
Walliser, J.C., de Visser, E.J., Wiese, E., Shaw, T.H.: Team structure and team building improve human–machine teaming with autonomous agents. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 13(4), 258–278 (2019)
Yoo, Y., Alavi, M.: Emergent leadership in virtual teams: what do emergent leaders do? Inf. Organ. 14, 27–58 (2004)
Zaccaro, S.J., Rittman, A.L., Marks, M.A.: Team leadership. Leadersh. Q. 12(4), 451–483 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Vars: "org/clulab/quickstart/grammars/ASIST/vars.yml"
rules:
  - name: "Entity"
    label: Entity
    priority: 1
    type: token
    pattern: |
      [entity="PERSON"]
      |
      [tag=/^N|PR*/ & !tag=/^V/]
  - name: "Action"
    label: Action
    priority: 2
    pattern: |
      trigger = [tag=/^V/]
      agent: Entity? = /${agents}/
      theme: Entity? = /${objects}/
  - name: "Medic"
    label: Roles
    priority: 1
    type: token
    pattern: |
      /(?i)medic/
      |
      [lemma=/medic|medical/]
  - name: "Hammer"
    label: Roles
    priority: 1
    type: token
    pattern: |
      /(!?)hammer/
  - name: "Specialist"
    label: Roles
    priority: 1
    type: token
    pattern: |
      /(!?)specialist/
  - name: "Search"
    label: Roles
    priority: 1
    type: token
    pattern: |
      /(!?)search/
  - name: "Obstacle"
    label: stuck
    priority: 1
    type: token
    pattern: |
      [lemma=/immobilize|frozen|stuck/]
      |
      [lemma=can] [lemma=not] [lemma=move]
      - name: "Approval"
    label: Approval
    priority: 2
    example: Sure, Bob!
    pattern: |
      trigger = [lemma=/yes|ok|okay|sure|alright|good|excellent|great|terrific|copy/]
      |
      /(?i)Sounds/ /good/
      |
      /(?i)I/ /agree/
      agent: Entity? = /${agents}/
      - name: "Responsibility"
    label: Responsibility
    priority: 2
    type: token
    example: I can do that.
    pattern: |
      [lemma=/(?i)I\’ll/]
      |
      /(?i)Can/ /do/
      |
      /(?i)Take/ /care/
      |
      /(?i)Let/ /me/
      |
      /(?i)I/ /will/
        # Planning Rules #
  #############################
  - name: "ConditionalIF"
    label: ContingentPlan
    priority: 3
    pattern: |
      trigger = [lemma=if]
      condition: Action = <mark
      solution: Action = <mark <advcl_if
  - name: "PlanTrig"
    label: Planning
    priority: 1
    type: token
    pattern: |
      /(?i)should|need/
      |
      [lemma=/plan|goal|bring|come|gather|get|be/]
  - name: "DeliberateFut"
    label: DeliberatePlan
    priority: 3
    pattern: |
      trigger = (?<= [tag=VBP & lemma=be]) [tag=VBG]
      # the first thing in the parantheses is a look behind so it’s going to look at everything that came before.
      # both inside the square brackets are constraints applied to a single token. A token comes before that is the tag restraints
      # and the verb "to be"
      # the second is capturing the gerund "am going"
      |
      (?<= [tag=MD & lemma=will]) [tag=VB]
      # to make this useful we need to know who is doing the planning.
      agent: Entity = >/${agents}/
      # agent is the name of the argument while Entity is the type.
      # the pattern is right hand side of the colon and is applied to the sentence.
      # from the trigger, follow an outgoing agent and it would need to be in previously found entity.
      theme: Param? = >/${objects}/
  - name: "HelpRequests"
    label: coordination
    example: Can someone help me?
    pattern: |
      trigger = /(?i)could|would|can/
      actor: Entity = <aux >/${agents}/
      # person doing the helping (someone)
      request: Action = <aux
      # not about linear order, we are traversing against an incoming aux to land on the end of the aux (from can to help)
      recipient: Entity? = <aux dobj
      # now, we’re traversing against an incoming aux to land on the dobj (from help to me).
  # - name: "Response"
  # label: coordination
  # example: I can help you.
  # type: token
  # pattern: |
  # /(?i)could|would|can/ [tag=/PRP|N*/]
  - name: "Unless"
    label: coordination
    type: token
    pattern: |
      /(?i)unless/ [tag=/PRP|N*/]
        # My Rule #
  # 5. Taking responsibility: Number of times participant takes responsibility #
  # (keywords: I can do that, I’ll take care of it, let me). #
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Maese, E., Diego-Rosell, P., Debusk-Lane, L., Kress, N. (2022). Development of Emergent Leadership Measurement: Implications for Human-Machine Teams. In: Gurney, N., Sukthankar, G. (eds) Computational Theory of Mind for Human-Machine Teams. AAAI-FSS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13775. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21671-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21671-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21670-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21671-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)