Abstract
Public procurement is of tremendous significance in the global economy due to the huge volume of investments and expenditure involved. In Morocco, it accounts for about 17% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). It is a strategic governance tool for governments to promote economic growth and provide sustainable social development, if conducted efficiently and transparently. However, many studies report that public procurement is one of the government fields that is highly vulnerable to corruption, fraud, mismanagement and lack of performance. To address these issues and other challenges, innovative digital tools have proven their significance efficiency in delivering a citizen-centric public procurement. The main objective of our paper is to review the cutting-edge technologies that can enhance the procurement process so as to present an integrated frame- work for public procurement 4.0 based on a holistic approach that aims to satisfy all stakeholders and leverage Morocco to become a digital African hub.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Matzler, K., Friedrich von den Eichen, S., Anschober, M., Kohler, T.: The crusade of digital disruption. J. Bus. Strat. 39 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-12-2017-0187
Ndou, D.: E-Government for developing countries: opportunities and challenges. EJISDC Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Develop. Countr. 18, 1–24 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x
Suarez, D. and Abdallah, E.: Public sector readiness in the age of disruption your journey to readiness answering tomorrow’s questions today (2019). https://www.pwc.com/m1/en/world-government-summit/documents/wgs-age-of disruption.pdf
United Nations: E-Government Survey 2020—digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development: With ADDENDUM ON COVID-19 response. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2020
Allam, Z., Dhunny, Z.A.: On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities 89, 80–91 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032
Guerrero-Ibáñez, J., Zeadally, S., Contreras-Castillo, J.: Sensor technologies for intelligent transportation systems. Sensors 18, 1212 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041212
Mohanta, B. K., Panda, S. S., Jena, D.: An overview of smart contract and use cases in blockchain technology. In: 9th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) pp. 1–4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2018.8494045
Akter, S., Michael, K., Uddin, M.R., McCarthy, G., Rahman, M.: Transforming business using digital innovations: the application of AI, blockchain, cloud and data analytics. Ann. Oper. Res. 308(1–2), 7–39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03620-w
OECD: Preventing corruption in public procurement (2016). http://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/Corruption-Public-Procurement-Brochure.pdf
OECD: Compendium of good practices for integrity in public procurement (2014). https://www.oecd.org/gov/public-procurement/compendium-for-good-practices-forintegrity-in-public-procurement.pdf
The World Bank: Fraud and corruption awareness handbook: A handbook for civil servants involved in public procurement, pp. 1–84 (2013). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/309511468156866119/Fraud-and-corruption-awareness-handbook-a-handbook-for-civil-servants-involved-in-public-procurement
Transparency International: Public procurement planning and corruption (2015). https://www.transparency.org/files/content/corruptionqas/Public_procurement_planning_and_corruption_2015.pdf
Transparency International: Transparency in budget execution (2014). https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/helpdesk/transparency-in-budget-execution
OECD: Integrity in public procurement: good practice from a to z (2007). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264027510-en. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/integrity-in-public-procurement_9789264027510-en
OECD: State of the art in the use of emerging technologies in the public sector (2019). https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/state-of-the-art-in-the-use-of-emerging-technologies-in-the-public-sector_932780bc-en
Berryhill, J, Kok Heang, K., Clogher, R., McBride, K.: Hello, World: Artificial intelligence and its use in the public sector. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No. 36 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1787/726fd39d-en
Al-mushayt, O.S.: Automating E-government services with artificial intelligence. IEEE Access 7(146821–146829), 2019 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946204
Ovsyannikova, A., Domashova, J.: Identification of public procurement contracts with a high risk of non-performance based on neural networks. Proc. Comput. Sci. 169, 795–799 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.161
Rabuzin, K., Modrušan, N.: Prediction of public procurement corruption indices using machine learning methods. In: IC3K 2019—R Fraudulent Misuse 11th International Jt. Conference Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Vol. 3, no. Ic3k, pp. 333–340 (2019), https://doi.org/10.5220/0008353603330340 (2019)
Leśniak, A., Zima, K.: Cost calculation of construction projects including sustainability factors using the case based reasoning (CBR) method. Sustain 10(5), 2018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051608
Wang, H., Lin, Q.: Risk cost measurement of value for money evaluation based on case-based reasoning and ontology: A case study of the urban rail transit public-private partnership projects in China. Sustainability 14(9) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095547
Choi, Y., Lee, H., Irani, Z.: Big data-driven fuzzy cognitive map for prioritising IT service procurement in the public sector. Ann. Oper. Res. 270(1–2), 75–104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2281-6
Amadou, D., Azmani, A., Harzli, M.: Tendering process: Improvement of analysis and evaluation of tenders based on the use of fuzzy logic and rule of proportion. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 101, 44–51 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5120/17759-8892
GarcÃa RodrÃguez, M.J., MontequÃn, V.R., Fernández, F.O., Villanueva Balsera, J.M.: Bidders recommender for public procurement auctions using machine learning: Data analysis, algorithm, and case study with tenders from Spain. Complexity (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8858258
GarcÃa RodrÃguez, M.J., RodrÃguez MontequÃn, V., Ortega Fernández, F., Villanueva Balsera, J.M.: Public procurement announcements in spain: regulations, data analysis, and award price estimator using machine learning. Complexity (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2360610
Yuyang, T., Wenchao, Z., Chunxiang, G.: The joint procurement model and algorithm for small and medium enterprise., Comput. Ind. Eng. 155 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107179
Lykidis, I., Drosatos, G.: The use of blockchain technology in e-government services. Computers 10(12), 168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10120168
Ghadimi, P., Ghassemi Toosi, F., Heavey, C.: A multi-agent systems approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation in a partnership supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 269(1), 286–301 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.07.014
Wang, H., Qin, H., Zhao, M., Wei, X., Shen, H., Susilo, W.: Blockchain-based fair payment smart contract for public cloud storage auditing. Inf. Sci. (Ny) 519(88), 348–362 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.01.051
Bellini, E., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E.: Blockchain-based e-vote-as-a-service. IEEE Int. Conf. Cloud Comput. Cloud 484–486 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2019.00085
Hajli, N., Tajvidi, M., Gbadamosi, A., Nadeem, W.: Understanding market agility for new product success with big data analytics. Ind. Mark. Manag. 86, 135–143 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.09.010
Jungherr, A.: Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. J. Inf. Technol. Polit. 13(1), 72–91 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
Hashem, I.A.T., et al.: The role of big data in smart city. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36(5), 748–758 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.002
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development: Are you ready for eProcurement? Guide to electronic procurement reform. https://www.ebrd.com/documents/legalreform/guide-to-eprocurement-reform.pdf
Bosio, E., Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., Shleifer, A.: Public procurement in law and practice. Am. Econ. Rev. 112(4), 1091–1117 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200738
Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., Bhatti, Z.A.: Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 173, 121102 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102
Gibson, J.P., Krimmer, R., Teague, V., Pomares, J.: A review of E-voting: the past, present and future. Ann. Telecommun. 71(7–8), 279–286 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-016-0525-8
Macintosh, A.: Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Proc. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. 37(C) 1843–1852 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2004.1265300
Toots, M.: Why E-participation systems fail: The case of Estonia’s Osale.ee. Gov. Inf. Q. 36(3), 546–559 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.002
Valle-Cruz, D., Fernandez-Cortez, V., Gil-Garcia, J.R.: From E-budgeting to smart budgeting: Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in government decision-making for resource allocation. Gov. Inf. Q. 39(2), 101644 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101644
Gamayuni, R.R., Agusta, E.: E-Planning and e-budgeting implementation: a qualitative study in lampung province. Int. J. Econ. Bus. Entrep. 2(2), 105–122 (2019). https://doi.org/10.23960/ijebe.v2i2.54
Lokman, A.S., Ameedeen, M.A.: Modern chatbot systems: A technical review. In: Arai, K., Bhatia, R., Kapoor, S. (eds.) FTC 2018. AISC, vol. 881, pp. 1012–1023. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02683-7_75
Hewa, T., Ylianttila, M., Liyanage, M.: Survey on blockchain based smart contracts: Applications, opportunities and challenges, J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 177, 102857 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102857
Pani, M., Verma, R., Sahoo, G.: A heuristic method for supplier selection using AHP, entropy and TOPSIS. Int. J. of Procurement Management. 5, 784–796 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2012.049715
Adewole, S., Rafiu, I., Ronke, B.: A fuzzy logic approach for evaluation of government performance in ICT projects implementation. J. Emerg. Trends Comput. Inf. Sci. 3, 1487–1494 (2012)
Asthana, N., Gupta, M.: Supplier selection using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Int. J. Indian Cult. Bus. Manag. 11(4), 457 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijicbm.2015.072428
Gegovska, T., Koker, R., Cakar, T.: Green supplier selection using fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making methods and artificial neural networks. Comput. Intell.. Neurosci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8811834
Calvetti, D., Mêda, P., Chichorro Gonçalves, M., Sousa, H. Worker 4.0: The future of sensored construction sites. Buildings 10, 169. (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10100169
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Taoufik, A.O., Azmani, A. (2022). Toward a Holistic Public Procurement 4.0. Case Study: Moroccan Public Procurement. In: Hamlich, M., Bellatreche, L., Siadat, A., Ventura, S. (eds) Smart Applications and Data Analysis. SADASC 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1677. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20490-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20490-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20489-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20490-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)