Skip to main content

Virtuality in Non-governmental Organizations: An Analysis from Working Conditions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2022)

Abstract

Nowadays, organizations’ dynamics have resulted in a migration towards organizational models based on remote work, which significantly changes the working conditions of diverse organizations such as non-governmental organizations, which are often responsible for providing advisory and support services to populations in vulnerable situations. In this sense, this study is aimed at identifying the conditions and context of virtual work within a non-governmental organization focused on the attention of the Venezuelan population residing in Colombia. A questionnaire of Likert scale answers is taken as a reference, consisting of a total of 47 questions, broken down into 11 items: Working conditions, Supervision, Recognition, Transcendence, Independence and/or autonomy, Communication with other areas, Career Growth, Technology Resources, Job Performance, Work/Life Balance and Health Conditions. The items in each section are ordinal scale response items (Likert scale) with 4 answer options, categorized from 1 to 4, where category 1 (Very dissatisfied) indicates lower satisfaction and category 4 (Very satisfied) indicates greater satisfaction. The instrument was applied to 30 individuals linked to the administrative and project management areas of the organization, it is observed that the working conditions correspond to 1.65 which indicates that on average people show some degree of high dissatisfaction with their working condition, related to noise, lighting, space, among other factors. As for the supervision item, 2.29 is noted, which means that workers are dissatisfied with the control applied by their boss and the way in which their performance is evaluated, however, the recognition category presents a 3.72 which is a high level of satisfaction and refers to the rewards for the achievement of the objectives and the recognition of their boss. The transcendence item that is related to the possibilities of creativity offered by the work, denotes 2.84 a moderate level of satisfaction, as well as Life/Work Balance, Health conditions with a 3.17 and 3.06 respectively. The items Independence/autonomy, Communication with other areas, Career growth, Technological resources, denote high levels of satisfaction, which means, that workers have the ability to freely decide aspects relating to their job, participate in the decisions of their working group and have opportunities to participate in calls or promotion to other projects. Finally, the item work performance has 2.69 a moderate level of satisfaction, which is related to the tasks and activities that must be performed at work and the times of fulfillment (time available to finish tasks).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parra, M., Marambio, C., Ramírez, J., Suárez, D., Herrera, H.: Educational convergence with digital technology: integrating a global society. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds.) HCII 2020. CCIS, vol. 1294, pp. 303–310. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60703-6_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Parejo, I., Nuñez, L., Nuñez, W.: Análisis de la transformación digital de las empresas en Colombia: dinámicas globales y desafíos actuales. Aglala 12(1), 160–172 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Handke, L., Klonek, F., Parker, S., Kauffeld, S.: Interactive effects of team virtuality and work design on team functioning. Small Group Res. 51(1), 3–47 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Teleworking during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Practical Guide. International Labour Organization (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carrasco-Mullins, R.: Telework: advantages and disadvantages in organizations and collaborators. faecosapiens 4(2), 1–14 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schultz, D.: Psicología Industrial. McGraw-Hill, México (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Orhan, M.A., Rijsman, J., van Dijk, G.: Invisible, therefore isolated: comparative effects of team virtuality with task virtuality on workplace isolation and work outcomes. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 32(2), 109–122 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herrera.: The impact of telework on the work and family environment and the effects on the worker. Int. Compar. J. Labor Rrelation. Employ. Law 9, 250–271 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramírez, J., Ballestas, M., Herrera, H., Ballesta, I.: Factores asociados al desempleo de los migrantes venezolanos en la ciudad de Barranquilla en el año 2020. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 28(2) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garcés, H.: Identificación de prejuicio del docentes en estudiantes migrantes venezolanos en Perú: un abordaje interpretativo. Revista Educare-Upel-IPB-Segunda Nueva Etapa 2.0 25(1), 102–127 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brito, I.: Labor productivity of human talent: criteria to be considered in social intervention foundations in Colombia. Consensus 4(3), 69–90 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Campo-Arias, A.: Uses of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Biomedica 26(4), 585 (2006). https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v26i4.327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hacker, J.V., Johnson, M., Saunders, C., Thayer, A.: Trust in virtual teams: a multidisciplinary review and integration. Aust. J. Inf. Syst. 23 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davidavičienė, V., Al Majzoub, K., Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I.: Factors affecting knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Sustainability 12(17), 6917 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mendoza-Ocasal, D., Castillo-Jiménez, R., Navarro, E., Ramírez, J.: Measuring workplace happiness as a key factor for the strategic management of organizations. Polish J. Manag. Stud. 24(2), 292–306 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pita, G.: Las TICs en las empresas: evolución de la tecnología y cambio estructural en las organizaciones. Dominio de las Ciencias 4(1), 499–510 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lay, N., et al.: Uso de las herramientas de comunicación asincrónicas y sincrónicas en la banca privada del municipio Maracaibo (Venezuela). Revista Espacios 40(4) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davidson Martínez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Martínez, D., Ramírez, J., Carbonó-Mercado, A., Arevalo, O., Parra, M., Viloria, D. (2022). Virtuality in Non-governmental Organizations: An Analysis from Working Conditions. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1655. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19682-9_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19682-9_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19681-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19682-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics