Abstract
Developing a strong community requires empowered leadership capable of overcoming governance challenges. New online platforms have given users opportunities to practice governance through content moderation roles. The over 2.8 million “subreddit” communities on Reddit are governed by hundreds of thousands of volunteer moderators, many of whom have no training or prior experience in a governing role. While moderators often devote daily time to community maintenance and cope with the emotional effects of hate comments or disturbing content, Reddit provides no compensation for this position. Thus, moderators’ internal motivations and desire to continue filling this role is critical for their community. Drawing upon the relationship between governance procedures and internalized motivation, we investigate how the processes through which subreddit moderators generate community rules increase moderators’ motivation through the meeting of social-psychological needs: Procedural Justice and Self Determination, and Self-Other Merging. Preliminary analysis of survey data from 620 moderators across Reddit shows a correlation between moderators’ administrative behaviors and the social-psychological needs underpinning their motivations. Understanding these relationships will allow us to empower moderators to build engaging and cooperative online communities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., Kraut, R.: Community effort in online groups: who does the work and why. In: Weisband, S.P. (ed.) Leadership at a distance: Research in technologically-supported work, pp. 171–194. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hoboken, NJ (2002)
Jie, C., Wohn, D.Y.: Coordination and collaboration: how do volunteer moderators work as a team in live streaming communities? (2022)
DeCaro, D.A., Janssen, M.A., Lee, A.: Synergistic effects of voting and enforcement on internalized motivation to cooperate in a resource dilemma. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 10(6), 511–537 (2015)
Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Bryan, D., Semaan, B.: Moderation practices as emotional labor in sustaining online communities: The case of AAPI identity work on Reddit. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (2019)
Fan, J., Zhang, A. X.: Digital Juries: a civics-oriented approach to platform governance. 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376293
Forte, A., Bruckman, A.: Scaling consensus: increasing decentralization in Wikipedia governance. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008) (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2008.383
Frey, S., Krafft, P. M., Keegan, B.C.: This place does what it was built for: designing digital institutions for participatory change. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019)
Frey, S., Sumner, R.W.: Emergence of integrated institutions in a large population of self-governing communities. PLoS ONE 14(7), 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216335
Frey, S., et al.: Governing online goods: maturity and formalization in Minecraft, Reddit, and world of Warcraft communities. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction CSCW (2021)
Hess, C., Ostrom, E.: A framework for analyzing the knowledge commons: a chapter from understanding knowledge as a commons: from theory to practice (2005)
Kiesler, Sara, et al.: Regulating behavior in online communities building successful online communities: evidence-based social design 1, 4–2 (2012)
Mano, M., Dalle, J.-M., Tomasik, J.: The consent of the crowd detected in an open forum. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3233391.3233538
Matias, J. N.: Going dark: social factors in collective action against platform operators in the Reddit blackout. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1138–1151 ACM (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858391
Matias, J. N.: The Civic Labor of volunteer moderators online. Social Media + Society, 5(2), (2019) https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119836778
Mindel, V., Mathiassen, L., Rai, A.: The sustainability of polycentric information commons. MIS Q. 42(2), 607–632 (2018)
Ostrom, E.: Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14(3), 137–158 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137
Preece, J.: Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability. John Wiley and Sons, New York (2000)
Rheingold, H.: The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000). http://www.rheingold.com/vc/book
Nathan, S., et al.: Modular politics: toward a governance layer for online communities. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, 1–26. CSCW1 (2021)
Seering, J., Wang, T., Yoon, J., Kaufman, G.: Moderator engagement and community development in the age of algorithms. New Media Soc. 21(7), 1417–1443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818821316
Shaw, A., Hill, B.M.: Laboratories of oligarchy? how the iron law extends to peer production. J. Commun. 64(2), 215–238 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/JCOM.12082
Schönleitner, G.: Can public deliberation democratise state action?: municipal health councils and local democracy in Brazil. In: Harriss, J., Stokke, K., Törnquist, O. (eds.) Politicising Democracy. IPES, pp. 75–106. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502802_4
Speer, J.: Participatory governance reform: a good strategy for increasing government responsiveness and improving public services? World Dev. 40(12), 2379–2398 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.034
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank research assistants Theresa Sims, Jesleyn Gill, Sharon Yoo, Katherine Coviello, Hannah Skepner, Samantha Vigil, Kabir Sahni, Anastacia Dobson Bell, Megan Tsang, Anna Beatrice Ricasata, Sean Abellera, Chengyue Jiang, Evan Brosnan, Yuqi Cheng, Nicole Calbreath, Abigail Endler, Nebiyat Walelign, Harneet Nagra, Alessandra Soto, Mark Murakami, Kelley Ann, Kexin Li, and Yakov Perlov for help with recruitment. Funding for this project was provided by the Provost’s Undergraduate Fellowship from the UC Davis Undergraduate Research Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, H.M., Bulat, B., Fujimoto, S., Frey, S. (2022). Governing for Free: Rule Process Effects on Reddit Moderator Motivations. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1655. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19682-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19682-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19681-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19682-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)