Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Burch

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Female Genitourinary and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction

Abstract

Burch colposuspension is a widely accepted surgical technique for management of stress urinary incontinence. It is a transabdominal retropubic approach aimed at treating stress incontinence by restoring support to the urethra. Traditionally, Burch procedures were performed via laparotomy. However, due to invasive nature of the open approach, they have been largely replaced by retropubic slings over the last several decades. However, laparoscopic and robotic approaches to the retropubic space can offer a minimally invasive surgical technique for management of stress urinary incontinence. This chapter will review the history of Burch colposuspension, describe minimally invasive surgical techniques, and discuss clinical outcomes of laparoscopic approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Penttinen J, Lindholm EL, Käär K, Kauppila A. Successful colposuspension in stress urinary incontinence reduces bladder neck mobility and increases pressure transmission to the urethra. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1989;244(4):233–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marquini GV, Bella Z, Sartori MGF. Burch procedure: a historical perspective. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022;44(5):511–518. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744312

  4. Burch JC. Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper’s ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele, and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961;81:281–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall VF, Marchetti AA, Krantz KE. The correction of stress incontinence by simple vesicourethral suspension. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1949;88(4):509–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Colombo M, Scalambrino S, Maggioni A, Milani R. Burch colposuspension versus modified Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy for primary genuine stress urinary incontinence: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(6):1573–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kammerer-Doak DN, Cornella JL, Magrina JF, Stanhope CR, Smilack J. Osteitis pubis after Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy: a pubic osteomyelitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(3 Pt 1):586–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sohlberg EM, Elliott CS. Burch colposuspension. Urol Clin North Am. 2019;46(1):53–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Green J, Herschorn S. The contemporary role of Burch colposuspension. Curr Opin Urol. 2005;15(4):250–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanagho EA. Colpocystourethropexy: the way we do it. J Urol. 1976;116(6):751–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vancaillie TG, Schuessler W. Laparoscopic bladderneck suspension. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991;1(3):169–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moehrer B, Ellis G, Carey M, Wilson PD. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;1:Cd002239.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carey MP, Goh JT, Rosamilia A, Cornish A, Gordon I, Hawthorne G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2006;113(9):999–1006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dean NM, Ellis G, Wilson PD, Herbison GP. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:Cd002239.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Partin AW, Adams JB, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;181(6):552–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan MS, Challacombe B, Rose K, Dasgupta P. Robotic colposuspension: two case reports. J Endourol. 2007;21(9):1077–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lind LR, Gunn GC, Mattox TF, Stanford EJ. Mini-incisional Burch urethropexy: a less invasive method to accomplish a time-tested procedure for treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004;15(1):20–4. discussion 4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ulmsten U, Petros P. Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1995;29(1):75–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jonsson Funk M, Levin PJ, Wu JM. Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(4):845–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Drain A, Khan A, Ohmann EL, Brucker BM, Smilen S, Rosenblum N, et al. Use of concomitant stress incontinence surgery at time of pelvic organ prolapse surgery since release of the 2011 notification on serious complications associated with transvaginal mesh. J Urol. 2017;197(4):1092–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lapitan MCM, Cody JD, Mashayekhi A. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):Cd002912.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alcalay M, Monga A, Stanton SL. Burch colposuspension: a 10-20 year follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102(9):740–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zullo F, Morelli M, Russo T, Iuzzolino D, Palomba S. Two techniques of laparoscopic retropubic urethropexy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9(2):178–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ankardal M, Milsom I, Stjerndahl JH, Engh ME. A three-armed randomized trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures and laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(8):773–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Persson J, Wølner-Hanssen P. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence: a randomized comparison of one or two sutures on each side of the urethra. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(1):151–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wallwiener D, Grischke EM, Rimbach S, Maleika A, Bastert G. Endoscopic retropubic colposuspension: “Retziusscopy” versus laparoscopy – a reasonable enlargement of the operative spectrum in the management of recurrent stress incontinence? Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1995;3(2–3):115–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bulent Tiras M, Sendag F, Dilek U, Guner H. Laparoscopic burch colposuspension: comparison of effectiveness of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal techniques. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;116(1):79–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kitchener HC, Dunn G, Lawton V, Reid F, Nelson L, Smith AR. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension – results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2006;113(9):1007–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Freites J, Stewart F, Omar MI, Mashayekhi A, Agur WI. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;12(12):Cd002239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ulubay M, Dede M, Öztürk M, Keskin U, Fidan U, Alanbay I, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted and abdominal hysterectomy with Concomitant Burch Colposuspension: preluminary study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(6s):S242–s3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee TG, Unlu BS, Petruzzi VA, Borahay MA, Dursun F, Saad AF, et al. Safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted Burch for pure stress urinary incontinence: a large case series. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;41(5):803–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ward KL, Hilton P. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG. 2008;115(2):226–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, Creta M, La Falce S, Waltregny D, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017;72(4):567–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, Norton P, Kraus SR, Zimmern PE, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(21):2143–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brubaker L, Richter HE, Norton PA, Albo M, Zyczynski HM, Chai TC, et al. 5-year continence rates, satisfaction and adverse events of burch urethropexy and fascial sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1324–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Karram MM, Barber MD. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(6):1249–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Karram MM, Walters MD, Paraiso MF. Randomised trial of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: long-term follow up. BJOG. 2008;115(2):219–25. discussion 25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson J, Ford A, Dubuisson JB, Mourad S, Digesu A. Burch colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(2):553–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Moore RD, Speights SE, Miklos JR. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8(3):389–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. De Cuyper EM, Ismail R, Maher CF. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension after failed sub-urethral tape procedures: a retrospective audit. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(5):681–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kwon J, Kim Y, Kim DY. Second-line surgical management after midurethral sling failure. Int Neurourol J. 2021;25(2):111–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Laparoscopic colposuspension or tension-free vaginal tape for recurrent stress urinary incontinence and/or intrinsic sphincter deficiency-a randomised controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2004;23(5–6):433.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Amaye-Obu FA, Drutz HP. Surgical management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(6):1296–307. discussion 307–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamara Grisales .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Grisales, T., Goldrath, K. (2023). Laparoscopic Burch. In: Martins, F.E., Holm, H.V., Sandhu, J.S., McCammon, K.A. (eds) Female Genitourinary and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19598-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19598-3_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19597-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19598-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics