Skip to main content

An Automated Process to Filter UAS-Based Point Clouds

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of UASG 2021: Wings 4 Sustainability (UASG 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 304))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 299 Accesses

Abstract

Digital Terrain Models (DTMs), which represent the topography of the bare Earth surface, are widely used in many geomatics applications. In parallel to the emergence of sophisticated Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) in recent years, they are produced from point clouds generated through aerial images taken from digital imaging systems mounted on UASs. The first and most important step of DTM production is to remove the points of the above-ground objects such as trees, buildings, bridges, etc. A great variety of point cloud filtering strategies have been developed so far. However, due to the irregularities in the topography of the Earth's surface, all proposed approaches employ several user-defined parameters, which makes point cloud filtering dependent on the parameter values defined. Since complex topographies make it very hard to define some protocols to estimate the best parameter values, users usually have to try a large number of parameter values for optimal filtering performance, which is neither practical nor time-efficient. Hence, this study proposed to use the metaheuristic Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) to estimate the parameters of a simple morphology-based (SMRF) point cloud filtering algorithm to improve its performance, automating the filtering process. The performance of the proposed filtering methodology was compared not only against that of the standard SMRF algorithm but also against those of popular filtering algorithms Cloth Simulation Filtering (CSF) and Progressive TIN Densification (PTIN). The results showed that the proposed filtering methodology outperformed the PTIN and standard SMRF algorithms and presented a comparable performance with the CSF algorithm, which is one of the most robust point cloud filtering algorithms proposed to date. It can also be concluded that metaheuristic optimization algorithms can be used to automate the point cloud filtering process, minimizing the filtering errors caused by user intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:tr:19122:ed-1:v1:en. Last Accessed 19 March 2021

  2. Birdal AC, Avdan U, Türk T (2017) Estimating tree heights with images from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 8(2):1144–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chou TY, Yeh ML, Chen YC, Chen YH (2010) Disaster monitoring and management by the unmanned aerial vehicle technology. In: ISPRS TC VII symposium—100 years ISPRS, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubbini M, Curzio LI, Campedelli A (2016) Digital elevation models from unmanned aerial vehicle surveys for archaeological interpretation of terrain anomalies: case study of the Roman castrum of Burnum (Croatia). J Archaeol Sci Rep 8:121–134

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eker R, Aydın A, Hübl J (2018) Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based monitoring of a landslide: Gallenzerkogel landslide (Ybbs-Lower Austria) case study. Environ Monit Assess 190(1):28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kachamba DJ, Ørka HO, Gobakken T, Eid T, Mwase W (2016) Biomass estimation using 3D data from unmanned aerial vehicle imagery in a tropical woodland. Remote Sens 8(11):968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohan M, Silva CA, Klauberg C, Jat P, Catts G, Cardil A, Hudak AT, Dia M (2017) Individual tree detection from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) derived canopy height model in an open canopy mixed conifer forest. Forests 8(9):340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iglesias L, Santos-Berbel D, Pascual V, Castro M (2019) Using small unmanned aerial vehicle in 3D modeling of highways with tree-covered roadsides to estimate sight distance. Remote Sens 11(22):2625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yilmaz V, Güngör O (2019) Estimating crown diameters in urban forests with unmanned aerial system-based photogrammetric point clouds. Int J Remote Sens 40(2):468–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yücel MA, Şanlıyüksel Yücel D, Yalçıner CÇ, Yılmaz D (2018) 3D modelling of historical remains using unmanned aerial vehicle, a case study: Gallipoli Peninsula. In: XXVIII international symposium on modern technologies, education and professional practice in geodesy and related fields, pp.101–107, Sofia, Bulgaria

    Google Scholar 

  11. Serifoglu Yilmaz C, Yilmaz V, Güngör O (2018) Investigating the performances of commercial and non-commercial software for ground filtering of UAV-based point clouds. Int J Remote Sens 39(15–16):5016–5042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yilmaz V (2021) Automated ground filtering of LiDAR and UAS point clouds with metaheuristics. Opt Laser Technol 138:106890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pingel TJ, Clarke KC, McBride WA (2013) An improved simple morphological filter for the terrain classification of airborne LIDAR data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 77:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Graham A, Coops NC, Wilcox M, Plowright A (2019) Evaluation of ground surface models derived from unmanned aerial systems with digital aerial photogrammetry in a disturbed conifer forest. Remote Sens 11(1):84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aljarah I, Faris H, Mirjalili S (2018) Optimizing connection weights in neural networks using the whale optimization algorithm. Soft Comput 22(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mostafa Bozorgi S, Yazdani S (2019) IWOA: An improved whale optimization algorithm for optimization problems. J Comput Design Eng 6(3):243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gharehchopogh FS, Gholizadeh H (2019) A comprehensive survey: whale optimization algorithm and its applications. Swarm Evol Comput 48:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sithole G, Vosselman G (2004) Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-Earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 59(1–2):85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Montealegre AL, Lamelas MT, De La Riva J (2015) A comparison of open-source LiDAR filtering algorithms in a Mediterranean forest environment. IEEE J Select Topics Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 8(8):4072–4085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang W, Qi J, Wan P, Wang H, Xie D, Wang X, Yan G (2016) An easy-to-use airborne LiDAR data filtering method based on cloth simulation. Remote Sens 8(6):501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Axelsson P (2000) DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. Int Archiv Photogramm Remote Sens 33(4):110–117

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the Department of Geomatics Engineering of Karadeniz Technical University for providing aerial photos of the test site.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volkan Yilmaz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yilmaz, V. (2023). An Automated Process to Filter UAS-Based Point Clouds. In: Jain, K., Mishra, V., Pradhan, B. (eds) Proceedings of UASG 2021: Wings 4 Sustainability. UASG 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 304. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19309-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19309-5_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19308-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19309-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics