Abstract
In the last two decades, technology entrepreneurship, involving two established but related fields, entrepreneurship, and technology-based innovation, attracted researchers and policymakers’ interest due to the recognized positive effect on economic development. Considering technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship as the main forces to achieve sustainable development at different levels of the economy and society, it is vital to assess and develop the ability to synergetic create these forces. Based on the importance of technology entrepreneurship and innovation in actual research trends, this research aims to develop a systematic literature review to analyze the existing articles that approach technology entrepreneurship and innovation and summarize their findings. The 73 articles reviewed were obtained through a search in the Web of Science database and used in a bibliographic-coupling analysis with VOSviewer software. The results enable the categorization of the existing literature revealing four clusters, namely, (1) venture financing, (2) factors of influence, (3) new technology ventures, and (4) importance of policies, location, and entrepreneurial surroundings. This study presents direct implications for the literature in TE and innovation, systematizing the existing studies and addressing the need for a systematic literature review that approaches both concepts simultaneously. It provides a framework that enables the scientific community to access the main subjects discussed and the articulation between concepts. It also presents a future research agenda.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abou-Warda, S.H.: New educational services development: framework for technology entrepreneurship education at universities in Egypt. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 30(5), 698–717 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2014-0142
Agogué, M., Lundqvist, M., Middleton, K.W.: Mindful deviation through combining causation and effectuation: a design theory-based study of technology entrepreneurship. Creat. Innov. Manag. 24(4), 629–644 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12134
Allarakhia, M., Walsh, S.: Analyzing and organizing nanotechnology development: application of the institutional analysis development framework to nanotechnology consortia. Technovation. 32(3–4), 216–226 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.001
Baglieri, D., Cesaroni, F., Orsi, L.: Does the nano-patent “Gold rush” lead to entrepreneurial-driven growth? Some policy lessons from China and Japan. Technovation. 34(12), 746–761 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.009
Bahrami, H., Evans, S.: Flexible re-cycling and high-technology entrepreneurship. Calif. Manag. Rev. 37(3), 62–89 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/41165799
Beckman, C., Eisenhardt, K., Kotha, S., Meyer, A., Rajagopalan, N.: Technology entrepreneurship. Strateg. Entrep. J. 10, 235–256 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/sej
Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D.A., Schnell, J., Adams, J.: Web of science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quant. Sci. Stud. 1(1), 363–376 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
Brown, R., Mason, C.: Inside the high-tech black box: a critique of technology entrepreneurship policy. Technovation. 34(12), 773–784 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.013
Carayannis, E.G., Barth, T.D., Campbell, D.F.: The quintuple helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. J. Innov. Entrepreneurship. 1(1), 2 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2
Carayannis, E.G., Cherepovitsyn, A.Y., Ilinova, A.A.: Technology commercialization in entrepreneurial universities: the US and Russian experience. J. Technol. Transfer. 41(5), 1135–1147 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9406-y
Doganova, L., Eyquem-Renault, M.: What do business models do?. Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Res. Policy. 38(10), 1559–1570 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.08.002
Dushnitsky, G., Lenox, M.J.: When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Res. Policy. 34(5), 615–639 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.017
Ferreira, J.J.M., Ferreira, F.A.F., Fernandes, C.I.M.A.S., Jalali, M.S., Raposo, M.L., Marques, C.S.: What do we [not] know about technology entrepreneurship research? Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 12(3), 713–733 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0359-2
Fuller, W., Rohaermel, T.: When stars Shine: the effects of faculty founders on new technology ventures. Strateg. Entrep. J. 10, 235–256 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/sej
Gartner, J., Maresch, D., Fink, M.: The potential of additive manufacturing for technology entrepreneurship: an integrative technology assessment. Creat. Innov. Manag. 24(4), 585–600 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12132
Gilsing, V.A., van Burg, E., Romme, A.G.L.: Policy principles for the creation and success of corporate and academic spin-offs. Technovation. 30(1), 12–23 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.07.004
Giones, F., Brem, A.: Digital technology entrepreneurship: a definition and research agenda. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 7(5), 44–51 (2017). https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview1076
Hülsbeck, M., Pickavé, E.N.: Regional knowledge production as determinant of high-technology entrepreneurship: empirical evidence for Germany. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 10(1), 121–138 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0217-9
Jelinek, M.: “Thinking technology” in mature industry firms: understanding technology entrepreneurship. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 11(7,8), 799–813 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1996.025469
Kessler, M.: Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am. Doc. 14(1), 10–25 (1963)
Khajeheian, D.: Audience commodification: a source of innovation in business models. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 6(8), 40–47 (2016). https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview1010
Levi-Jakšić, M., Jovanović, M., Petković, J.: Technology entrepreneurship in the changing business environment – a triple helix performance model. Amfiteatru Econ. 17(38), 422–440 (2015)
Li, H., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Zhou, L.-A., Zhang, W.: Returnees versus locals: who perform better in China’s technology entrepreneurship? Strateg. Entrep. J. 10, 235–256 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/sej
Liu, T.H., Hung, S.C., Wu, S.Y., Chu, Y.Y.: Technology entrepreneurial styles: a comparison of UMC and TSMC. IEEE Int. Eng. Manag. Conf. 2, 679–683 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2005.006006
Maia, C., Claro, J.: The role of a proof of concept center in a university ecosystem: an exploratory study. J. Technol. Transfer. 38(5), 641–650 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9246-y
Maine, E., Garnsey, E.: Commercializing generic technology: the case of advanced materials ventures. Res. Policy. 35(3), 375–393 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.006
Maine, E., Garnsey, E.: The commercialisation environment of advanced materials ventures. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 39(1–2), 49–71 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2007.013440
Malen, J., Marcus, A.A.: Promoting clean energy technology entrepreneurship: the role of external context. Energy Policy. 102, 7–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.045
Matejun, M.: Role of technology entrepreneurship in the development of innovativeness of small and medium-sized enterprises. Management. 20(1), 167–183 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/manment-2015-0032
Mollick, E., Nanda, R.: Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Manag. Sci. 62(6), 1533–1553 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2207
Mosey, S., Guerrero, M., Greenman, A.: Technology entrepreneurship research opportunities: insights from across Europe. J. Technol. Transfer. 42(1), 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9462-3
Park, H.D., Steensma, K.: The selection and nurturing effects of corporate investors on new venture innovativeness. Strateg. Entrep. J. 10, 311–330 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/sej
Park, H.D., Tzabbar, D.: Venture capital, CEOs’ sources of power, and innovation novelty at different life stages of a new venture. Organ. Sci. 27(2), 336–353 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1054
Pathak, S., Laplume, A.O., Xavier-Oliveira, E.: Informal institutions and technology use by entrepreneurs an empirical study across 18 emerging markets. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 11(1), 57–71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-11-2012-0160
Pathak, S., Xavier-Oliveira, E., Laplume, A.O.: Influence of intellectual property, foreign investment, and technological adoption on technology entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Res. 66(10), 2090–2101 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.035
Qian, H., Haynes, K.E.: Beyond innovation: the Small Business Innovation Research program as entrepreneurship policy. J. Technol. Transfer. 39(4), 524–543 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9323-x
Ratinho, T., Harms, R., Walsh, S.: Structuring the technology entrepreneurship publication landscape: making sense out of chaos. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 100, 168–175 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.004
Roundy, P.T., Bradshaw, M., Brockman, B.K.: The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a complex adaptive systems approach. J. Bus. Res. 86, 1–10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.032
Siqueira, A.C.O., Bruton, G.D.: High-technology entrepreneurship in emerging economies: firm informality and contextualization of resource-based theory. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 57(1), 39–50 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2009.2028323
Smith, S.W., Shah, S.K.: Do innovative users generate more useful insights? An analysis of corporate venture capital investments in the medical device industry. Strateg. Entrep. J. 10, 235–256 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/sej
Song, M., Podoynitsyna, K., Bij, H., Halman, J.I.M.: Success factors in new ventures. A meta-analzsis. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 25, 7–27 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00280.x
Tanev, S.: Is there a lean future for global startups? Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 7(5), 6–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview1072
Tanev, S., Rasmussen, E.S., Zijdemans, E., Lemminger, R.O.Y., Svendsen, L.L.: Lean and global technology start-ups: linking the two research streams. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 19(3), 1–41 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919615400083
Tang, H.K., Yeo, K.T.: Technology, entrepreneurship and national development: lessons from Singapore. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 10(7–8), 797–814 (1995)
Teece, D.J.: Research directions for knowledge management. Calif. Manag. Rev. 40(3), 229–234 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812834478_0011
Tierney, R., Hermina, W., Walsh, S.: The pharmaceutical technology landscape: a new form of technology roadmapping. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80(2), 194–211 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.05.002
Yanez, M., Khalil, T.M., Walsh, S.T.: IAMOT and Education: Defining a Technology and Innovation Management (TIM) Body-of-Knowledge (BoK) for graduate education (TIM BoK). Technovation. 30(7–8), 389–400 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patrício, L.D., Fernandes, C. (2023). Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Guarda, T., Fernandes, C., Augusto, M.F. (eds) Technology, Business, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship in Industry 4.0. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17960-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17960-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17959-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17960-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)