Skip to main content

Recognition and Early Management of Sepsis in Frail Patients

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The High-risk Surgical Patient
  • 1438 Accesses

Abstract

Surgery presents an infectious risk that varies depending on several factors. First of all, emergency interventions present a greater risk of infection than elective interventions, while other risk factors are related to the type of surgery, the organ concerned, the length of surgery, and the type of subject undergoing the surgical procedure.

Other risk factors are related to the kind of patient one is dealing with, and frail patients are at the highest infectious risk.

Frailty has always been considered linked to disability, comorbidity, and other characteristics, but it may actually have a biological basis and be a distinct clinical syndrome.

Regardless of the subject’s risk factors, early diagnosis of sepsis is essential, starting with the stratification of patients which can be carried out through classification methods. The SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score, which has been updated very recently by a Consensus on the definition of Sepsis and Septic Shock, takes into consideration some parameters that evaluate the severity of the clinical and metabolic structure.

Among the scores used, in addition to C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, recently, other biomarkers have been studied.

In the treatment of sepsis, the goal is to use the correct antibiotic as soon as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krislyn M, Mueck L, Kao S. Patients at high-risk for surgical site infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017;18(4):440–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vogel TR, Dombrovskiy VY, et al. Impact of infectious complications after elective surgery on hospital readmission and late deaths in the U.S. Medicare population. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2012;13(5):307–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Winograd CH. Targeting strategies: an overview of criteria and outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39S:25S–35S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McMillan GJ, Hubbard RE. Frailty in older inpatients: what physicians need to know. Q J Med. 2012;105:1059–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ling ML, Apisarnthanarak A, Azlina Abbas A, et al. APSIC guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shao J, Zhang H, Yin B, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection following operative treatment of ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;56:124–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Levy MM, FinkMP MJC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conference. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1250–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nasa P, Juneja D, Singh O. Severe sepsis and septic shock in elderly. World J Crit Care Med. 2012;1(1):23–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dombrovskiy VY, Martin AA, Sunderram J, et al. Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: a trend analysis from 1993 to 2003. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1244–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Moss M. The effect of age on the development and outcome of adult sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Girard TD, Opal SM, Ely EW. Insights into severe sepsis in older patients: from epidemiology to evidence-based management. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;40:719–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Walter LC, Brand RJ, Counsell SR, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic index for 1-year mortality in older adults after hospitalization. JAMA. 2001;285:2987–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Valenti WM, Trudell RG, Bentley DW. Factors predisposing to oropharyngeal colonization with gram-negative bacilli in the aged. N Engl J Med. 1978;298:1108–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tomsic I, Chaberny IF, Krauth C, et al. Implementation interventions in preventing surgical site infections in abdominal surgery: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):236.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sartelli M, Chichom-Mefire A, Labricciosa FM, et al. The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections. World J Emerg Surg. 2017;12:29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sartelli M. A focus on intra-abdominal infections. World J Emerg Surg. 2010;5:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiaodong Y, Bin S, Xing Z, et al. Incomplete immune reconstitution in HIV/AIDS patients on antiretroviral therapy: challenges of immunological non-responders. J Leukoc Biol. 2020;107(4):597–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singer M, Deutschman CS, et al. The third international consensus definition for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Faix JD. Biomarkers of sepsis. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2013;50(1):23–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghezzi P, Cerami A. Tumor necrosis factor as a pharmacological target. Methods Mol Med. 2004;98:1–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Petilla V, Hynninen M, Takkunen O, et al. Predictive value of procalcitonin and interleukin 6 in critically ill patients with suspected sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1220–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eliasson M, Egesten A. Antibacterial chemokines: actors in both innate and adaptive immunity. In: Herwald H, Egesten A, editors. Contributions to microbiology: trends in innate immunity, vol. 15. Basel: Karger; 2008. p. 101–17.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Geven C, Kox M, Pikkers P. Adrenomedullin and Adrenomedullin-targeted therapy as treatment strategies relevant for sepsis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:292.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen YX, Li CS. Prognostic value of adrenomedullin in septic patients in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(7):1017–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mierzchala-Pasierb M, Lipinska-Gediga M. Sepsis diagnosis and monitoring-procalcitonin as standard, but what next? Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(4):299–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. CZhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gallo Marin B, Aghagoli G, Lavine K. Predictors of Covid-19 severity: a literature review. Rev Med Virol. 2021;31(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zaninotto M, Mion MM, Marchioro L. Endothelial dysfunction and mid-regional proAdrenomedullin: what role in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients? Clin Chim Acta. 2021;523:185–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lelubre C, Anselin S, Zouaoui Boudjeltia K, et al. Interpretation of C-reactive protein concentration in critically ill patients. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:124021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Song M, Kellum JA. Interleukin-6. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(12 Suppl):S463–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mahroum N, Mahagna H, Amital H. Diagnosis and classification of adult still’s disease. J Autoimmun. 2014;48:34–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Alexandre, Mendonça Helena, Santos Ricardo, Franco-Duarte Paula, Sampaio. Fungal infections diagnosis – Past present and future. Res Microbiol. 2022;173(3) 103915-S0923250821001297 103915 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2021.103915.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Beltrame .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beltrame, A., Anselmo, M. (2023). Recognition and Early Management of Sepsis in Frail Patients. In: Aseni, P., Grande, A.M., Leppäniemi, A., Chiara, O. (eds) The High-risk Surgical Patient. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17273-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17273-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17272-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17273-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics