Skip to main content

Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Predictive Maintenance Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in System-Integrated Intelligence (SYSINT 2022)

Abstract

In the field of industry 4.0, one of the sectors in which research is particularly active is the area of Predictive Maintenance(PdM), the purpose of which is to improve the industrial production process. This type of maintenance aims to predict a possible failure event, reduce non-production times and increase the quality of the processing result. The objective of this paper is to select the best Machine Learning models for a PdM application. In particular, such a model should allow making a prediction based on a real dataset, obtained by monitoring a turning process, with the aim of making the classification of the chip shape. The criteria used to choose the best model are accuracy and prediction speed (to reduce the inference time). Indeed it is crucial to spot any potential machine fault in the shortest time possible, in order to intervene before the machine fails. Hence, our goal is to choose the ML models with a lesser inference time while still maintaining high accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rausand, M., Hoyland, A.: System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications, vol. 396. Wiley (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van, T., Chan, I., Parthasarathi, S., Lim, C., Chua, Y.: IoT and machine learning enable predictive maintenance for manufacturing systems: a use-case of laser welding machine implementation. Available At SSRN 4073901 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ouadah, A., Zemmouchi-Ghomari, L., Salhi, N.: Selecting an appropriate super-vised machine learning algorithm for predictive maintenance. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 119, 4277–4301 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, S.: Application of machine learning to a medium Gaussian support vector machine in the diagnosis of motor bearing faults. Electronics 10, 2266 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pan, Z., Meng, Z., Chen, Z., Gao, W., Shi, Y.: A two-stage method based on extreme learning machine for predicting the remaining useful life of rolling-element bearings. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 144, 106899 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Suksawat, B.: Chip form classification and main cutting force prediction of cast nylon in turning operation using artificial neural network. In: ICCAS 2010. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Viharos, Z.J., Markos, S., Szekeres, C.: ANN-based chip-form classification in turning. In: Proceedings of the XVII. IMEKO World Congress–Metrology in the 3rd Millennium (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sukvittayawong, S., InaSaki, I.: Identification of chip form in turning process. JSME Int. J. Ser. 3, Vib. Control Eng. Eng. Ind. 34(4), 553–560 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Segreto, T., Simeone, A., Teti, R.: Chip form classification in carbon steel turning through cutting force measurement and principal component analysis. Procedia CIRP 2, 49–54 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keshari, A., D’Addona, D., Teti, R.: Subtraction of inconsistence sensor data to improve the chip form classification and monitoring efficiency. In: 6th CIRP International Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering-CIRP ICME, vol. 8 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hanief, M., Wani, M.F., Charoo, M.S.: Modeling and prediction of cutting forces during the turning of red brass (C23000) using ANN and regression analysis. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 20(3), 1220–1226 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nalbant, M., Gokkaya, H., Toktaş, İ.: Comparison of regression and artificial neural network models for surface roughness prediction with the cutting parameters in CNC turning. Model. Simul. Eng. 2007, 14 (2007). Article No. 92717. https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/92717

  13. Wenkler, E., Arnold, F., Hänel, A., Nestler, A., Brosius, A.: Intelligent characteristic value determination for cutting processes based on machine learning. Procedia CIRP 79, 9–14 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lela, B., Bajić, D., Jozić, S.: Regression analysis, support vector machines, and Bayesian neural network approaches to modeling surface roughness in face milling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 42, 1082–1088 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hesser, D.F., Markert, B.: Tool wear monitoring of a retrofitted CNC milling machine using artificial neural networks. Manuf. Lett. 19, 1–4 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho, S., Asfour, S., Onar, A., Kaundinya, N.: Tool breakage detection using support vector machine learning in a milling process. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 45(3), 241–249 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gouarir, A., Martínez-Arellano, G., Terrazas, G., Benardos, P., Ratchev, S.: In-process tool wear prediction system based on machine learning techniques and force analysis. Procedia CIRP 77, 501–504 (2018). 8th CIRP Conference on High Performance Cutting (HPC 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, D., et al.: A comparative study on machine learning algorithms for smart manufacturing: tool wear prediction using random forests. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 139(7) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Technical Committee ISO/TC 29: Tool-life testing with single-point turning tools, 2nd edn., November 1993. Reference number: ISO 3685:1993(E)

    Google Scholar 

  20. https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/classification-learner-app.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2022

  21. Du Preez, A., Oosthuizen, G.A.: Machine learning in cutting processes as enabler for smart sustainable manufacturing. Procedia Manuf. 33, 810–817 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu, K.: Modeling of the machining process. In: Smart Machining Systems. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87878-8_2

  23. D’Addona, D., Teti, R.: Kohonen maps for chip form classification in turning. In: 3rd Virtual Conference on Intelligent Production, Machines and Systems - IPROMS2007, 2–14 July, pp. 630–635 (2007). ISBN 978-14200-7347-8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Merenda, M., Porcaro, C., Iero, D.: Edge machine learning for AI-enabled IoT devices: a review. Sensors 20, 2533 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Merenda, M., Astrologo, M., Laurendi, D., Romeo, V., Della Corte, F.G.: A novel fitness tracker using edge machine learning. In: 2020 IEEE 20th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), pp. 212–215 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MELE-CON48756.2020.9140602

  26. Merenda, M., Porcaro, C., Della Corte, F.G.: LED junction temperature prediction using machine learning techniques. In: 2020 IEEE 20th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), pp. 207–211 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MELE-CON48756.2020.9140539

  27. Merenda, M., Cimino, G., Carotenuto, R., Corte, F.G.D., Iero, D.: Device-free hand gesture recognition exploiting Machine Learning applied to RFID. In: 2021 6th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech), pp. 1–5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech52315.2021.9566385

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessia Lazzaro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lazzaro, A., D’Addona, D.M., Merenda, M. (2023). Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Predictive Maintenance Applications. In: Valle, M., et al. Advances in System-Integrated Intelligence. SYSINT 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 546. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16281-7_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16281-7_62

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16280-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16281-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics