Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thinking Extended Trans Level Based on Local Culture to Achieve Super-Smart People

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrated Education and Learning

Part of the book series: Integrated Science ((IS,volume 13))

  • 641 Accesses

Summary

The development of industrial revolution 4.0 supports the creation of a super-smart society 5.0. Every individual has the opportunity to become a member of that society. They are individuals who have Twenty-first-century skills and competence as super-smart people. This chapter discusses thinking super-extended trans based on local culture to achieve super-smart people. We have examined various studies substantially in mathematics education, given that mathematics is a basic science that serves science and technology. We explain that super-smart society 5.0 comprises individuals with a super-extended trans character.

Graphical Abstract/Art Performance

The road to super-smart society.

VR, virtual reality; AR, augmented reality; IoT, internet of things, DT, digital transformation; and AI, artificial intelligence.

Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn’t do than by the ones you did do.

Mark Twain

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Budden L (2007) Critical thinking skills. Developing effective analysis and argument 25(1–2)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Slavin RE (2014) Educational psychology theory and practice, 10th edn. United States of America: Pearson

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tall D (1975) A long-term learning schema, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  4. Solso RL (1995) Cognitive psychology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hunt RR, Ellis HC (2003) Fundamental of cognitive psychology, Sixth. McGraw-Hill College, Boston, p 2003

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dubinsky E, Mcdonald MA (2001) APOS : a constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dubinsky E, Weller K, McDonald MA, Brown A (2000) Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: an APOS analysis, Part 2, 265 Northwoods Rd. Hermon, NY, p 13652

    Google Scholar 

  8. Widada W, Efendi S, Herawaty D, Nugroho KUZ (2020) The genetic decomposition of students about infinite series through the ethnomathematics of Bengkulu, Indonesia. In: IOP conference series journal of physics conference series 1470 012078 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012078 1470, pp 1–9

  9. Widada W, Herawaty D (2017) Dekomposisi Genetik tentang Hambatan Mahasiswa dalam Menerapkan Sifat-sifat Turunan. J. Didakt. Mat 4(2):136–151

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dubinsky (2000) Using a theory of learning in college mathematics courses. MSOR Connect 1(2):10–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cooley L, Trigueros M, Baker B (2007) Schema thematization: a framework and an example. J Res Math Educ 38(4):370–392

    Google Scholar 

  12. Widada W (2017) Beberapa Dekomposisi Genetik Siswa dalam Memahami Matematika. J. Pendidik. Mat. Raflesia 1(1):44–54

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (2006) The discovery of grounded theory, strategies for qualitative research. Aldine transaction, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  14. Piaget J, Garcia R (1989) Psychologies and the history of science. http://www.piaget.org/

  15. Baker B, Cooley L, Trigueros M (2000) A calculus graphing schema. J Res Math Educ 31(5):557–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Widada W (2016) Profile of cognitive structure of students in understanding the concept of real analysis. J Math Educ 5(2):83–98

    Google Scholar 

  17. Widada W, Herawaty D (2018) The effects of the extended triad model and cognitive style on the abilities of mathematical representation and proving of theorem. Adv Soc Sci Educ Humanit Res 218, no ICoMSE 2017, 89–95

    Google Scholar 

  18. Widada W (2019) Realizing super smart people 5.0 through ethnomatematics. In: Seminar Nasional S-2 Pendidikan Dasar Universitas Bengkulu, 30 November 2019

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alhefeiti FSO (2018) Society 5.0 A human-centered society that balances economic advancement with the resolution of social problems by a system that highly integrates cyberspace and physical space. The British University in Dubai

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gladden ME (2019) Who will be the members of Society 5.0? Towards an anthropology of technologically posthumanized future societies Soc Sci 8(5)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Holroyd C (2020) Technological innovation and building a ‘super smart’ society: Japan’s vision of society 5.0. J Asian Public Policy, p 17516234

    Google Scholar 

  22. Anonimous (2019) The development and securing of the human resources that will contribute to a super smart society. 1:158–179

    Google Scholar 

  23. Supendi A, Nurjanah (2019) Society 5.0 : Is it high-order thinking ? In: 2nd international conference on elementary education 2(1):1054–1059

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hershkowitz R, Schwarz BB, Dreyfus T (2001) Abstraction in context: epistemic actions. Dimuat dalam JRME. J Res Math Educ 32(2)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Widada W, Herawaty D, Jumri R, Wulandari H (2020) Students of the extended abstract in proving Lobachevsky’s parallel lines theorem. In: IOP conference series journal of physics conference series 1470 012098 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012098 1470, pp 1–10

  26. Witkin HA (1971) Manual embedded figures test, children’s embedded figures test, group embedded figures test. Consulting Psychology Press Inc., California

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schwank I (2014) On predicative versus functional cognitive structures. Eur Res Math Educ I.II Gr. 5. http//www.fmd.uni-osnabrueck.de/ebooks/erme/cerme1-proceedings/cerme1-proceedings.html, vol 5, no April

  28. Suharto S, Widada W (2019) The cognitive structure of students in understanding mathematical concepts. Adv Soc Sci Educ Humanit Res. vol 295, no ICETeP 2018, pp 65–69

    Google Scholar 

  29. Suharto S, Widada W (2019) The contribution of mathematical connection and mathematical communication to problem-solving ability. Int J Sci Res 8(1):155–159

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lamb S, Doecke E, Maire Q (2017) Key skills for the twenty first century: an evidence-based review. NSW Gov., p 70

    Google Scholar 

  31. AAMT (2009) School mathematics for the twenty first century some key influences. AAMT Inc, no May

    Google Scholar 

  32. Herawaty D, Widada W, Adhitya A, Sari RDW, Novianita L (2020) Students’ ability to simplify the concept of function through realistic mathematics learning with the ethnomathematics approach. In: IOP conference series journal of physics conference series 1470 012031 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012031 vol 1470, pp 1–8

  33. Widada W, Herawaty D, Andriyani DS, Marantika R, Yanti ID (2020) The thinking process of students in understanding the concept of graphs during ethnomathematics learning. In: IOP conference series journal of physics conference series 1470 012072 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012072 vol 1470, pp 1–8

  34. Widada W, Herawaty D, Nugroho KUZ, Anggoro AFD (2019) The scheme characteristics for students at the level of trans in understanding mathematics during etno-mathematics learning. Adv Soc Sci Educ Humanit Res 253, no Aes 2018, pp 417–421

    Google Scholar 

  35. Widada W, Herawaty D, Ariska S, Afifah R, Anggoro AFD (2020) The characteristics of relational students in understanding the concepts of normal subgroups. In: IOP conference series journal of physics conference series 1470 012069 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012069 vol 1470, pp 1–9

  36. D’Ambrosio U (2015) From mathematics education and society to mathematics education and a sustainable civilization. In: Proceedings of eighth international mathematics education and society conference vol 2, no June. Portland, Oregon, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rosa M, Orey DC (2011) Ethnomathematics: the cultural aspects of mathematics. Rev. Latinoam. Etnomatemática 4(2):32–54

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brandt A, Chernoff E (2015) The importance of ethnomathematics in the math class. Ohio J Sch Math 71(71):31–37

    Google Scholar 

  39. Barton B (1996) Making sense of ethnomathematics: ethnomathematics is making sense. Educ Stud Math 31:201–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. François K (2010) The role of ethnomathematics within mathematics education. In: Cent. Log. Philos. Sci. Free Univ. Brussels, no. December, pp 1517–1526

    Google Scholar 

  41. Orey DC, Rosa M (2004) Ethnomathematics: teaching and learning mathematics from a multicultural perspective. J Math Cult, vol 1, no May 2006, pp 139–148

    Google Scholar 

  42. Widada W (2015) Proses Pencapaian Konsep Matematika dengan Memanfaatkan Media Pembelajaran Kontekstual. J. Penelit. Pendidik. Mat. dan Sains 22(1):31–44

    Google Scholar 

  43. Achor EE, Imoko BI, Uloko ES (2009) Effect of ethnomathematics teaching approach on senior secondary students’ achievement and retention in locus. Educ Res 4(8):385–390

    Google Scholar 

  44. Balamurugan M (2015) Etnomathematics: an approach for learning mathematics from multicultural perspective. Int J Mod Res Rev vol 3, no 6, pp 716–720

    Google Scholar 

  45. Massarwe K, Verner I, Bshouty D (2012) Ethnomathematics and multicultural education: analysis and construction of geometric ornaments. J Math Cult vol 4, no January 2014, pp 344–360

    Google Scholar 

  46. Palhares P, Shirley L (2015) The role of ethnomathematics in mathematics education. In: The proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education, pp 575–578

    Google Scholar 

  47. OECD (2019) OECD future of education and skills 2030: project background, p 15

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wang Y, Lavonen J, Tirri K (2018) Aims for learning 21st century competencies in national primary science curricula in China and Finland. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 14(6):2081–2095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Herawaty D, Widada W, Nugroho KUZ, Anggoro AFD (2019) The improvement of the understanding of mathematical concepts through the implementation of realistic mathematics learning and ethnomathematics. Adv Soc Sci Educ Humanit Res vol 295, no ICETeP 2018, pp 21–25

    Google Scholar 

  50. Widada W, Herawaty D, Anggoro AFD, Yudha A, Hayati MK (2019) Ethnomathematics and outdoor learning to improve problem-solving ability. Adv Soc Sci Educ Humanit Res vol 295, no ICETeP 2018, pp 13–16

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lipka J, Andrew-irhke D (2019) Ethnomathematics applied to classrooms in Alaska : math in a cultural context. J Math Cult no Mcc, pp 2–4

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gerdes P (1994) Reflections on ethnomathematics. Learn Math 14(2):19–22

    Google Scholar 

  53. Widada W, Herawaty D, Nugroho KUZ, Anggoro AFD (2019) The ability to understanding of the concept of derivative functions for inter-level students during ethnomathematics learning. J Phys Conf Ser 1179(012056):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  54. Widada W, Herawaty D, Jumri R, Zulfadli Z, Damara BEP (2019) The influence of the inquiry learning model and the Bengkulu ethnomathematics toward the ability of mathematical representation. J Phys Conf Ser 1318(012085):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  55. Herawaty D, Khrisnawati D, Widada V, Mundana P (2020) The cognitive process of students in understanding the parallels axiom through ethnomathematics learning. In: IOP conference series journal of physics conference series 1470 012077 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012077. vol 1470, pp 1–8

  56. Widada W, Herawaty D, Beka Y, Sari RM, Riyani R (2020) The mathematization process of students to understand the concept of vectors through learning realistic mathematics and ethnomathematics. In: IOP conference series journal of physics conference series 1470 012071 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012071. vol 1470, pp 1–10

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia

    Wahyu Widada & Dewi Herawaty

Authors
  1. Wahyu Widada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dewi Herawaty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wahyu Widada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Stockholm, Sweden

    Nima Rezaei

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Widada, W., Herawaty, D. (2022). Thinking Extended Trans Level Based on Local Culture to Achieve Super-Smart People. In: Rezaei, N. (eds) Integrated Education and Learning. Integrated Science, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15963-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15963-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15962-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15963-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation