Skip to main content

How is Two Better Than One? An Observational Study on the Impact of Working in Pairs When Solving Bebras Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Informatics in Schools. A Step Beyond Digital Education (ISSEP 2022)

Abstract

Every year the Bebras challenge proposes small tasks to students, based on CS concepts. In Italy, in 2021 for the first time, it was possible to choose whether to participate in the challenge individually or in teams of two students. The team size was expected to affect the performance of students; in particular working in pairs was expected to increase the probability of solving the tasks correctly. We carried out an observational study on the results of the 2021 Bebras challenge in Italy, aiming at investigating and measuring the effects of team size on the performance. The findings confirm that working in pairs generally improves the team performance, but the impact is much smaller than expected. We observed that the positive effect of collaboration is greater with younger pupils and somewhat decreases when age increases. We identified and discussed the features of tasks where the impact was more relevant, and where this trend was more evident. We also propose some hypotheses, to analyze in future qualitative studies, to interpret the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for example https://www.ed.gov/stem.

  2. 2.

    See http://bebras.org.

  3. 3.

    See https://mc-stan.org/.

  4. 4.

    One can estimate also the variance of p in order to have a measure of the variability, but an estimation of the error with respect to the “true value” needs inevitably some assumption on the underlying distribution.

  5. 5.

    We used the data provided by INVALSI for the school year 2021, taken from https://invalsi-serviziostatistico.cineca.it/; see also [11] for a previous study.

  6. 6.

    See https://www.oecd.org/pisa.

References

  1. Dagienė, V.: Sustaining informatics education by contests. In: Hromkovič, J., Královič, R., Vahrenhold, J. (eds.) ISSEP 2010. LNCS, vol. 5941, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11376-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Galton, M., Williamson, J.: Groupwork in the Primary Classroom. Routledge, London (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Haberman, B., Cohen, A., Dagienė, V.: The beaver contest: attracting youngsters to study computing. In: Proceedings of ITiCSE 2011, pp. 378–378. ACM, Darmstadt (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laal, M., Ghodsi, S.M.: Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 31, 486–490 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McElreath, R.: Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York (2020)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Messer, D.J., Joiner, R., Loveridge, N., Light, P., Littleton, K.: Influences on the effectiveness of peer interaction: children’s level of cognitive development and the relative ability of partners. Soc. Dev. 2(3), 279–294 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nokes-Malach, T.J., Richey, J.E., Gadgil, S.: When is it better to learn together? Insights from research on collaborative learning. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 27(4), 645–656 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. OECD: PISA 2015 Results (Volume V) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams, L.: Integrating pair programming into a software development process. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, pp. 27–36 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEE.2001.913816

  10. Wood, D., O’Malley, C.: Collaborative learning between peers. Educ. Psychol. Pract. 11(4), 4–9 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1080/0266736960110402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bellettini, C., Lonati, V., Monga, M., Morpurgo, A.: An analysis of the performance of Italian schools in Bebras and in the national student assessment INVALSI. In: Fronza, I., Pahl, C. (ed.) Proceedings of the 2nd Systems of Assessments for Computational Thinking Learning Workshop (TACKLE 2019). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2434 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bellettini, C., Lonati, V., Monga, M., Morpurgo, A.: Behind the shoulders of bebras teams: analyzing how they interact with the platform to solve tasks. In: Lane, H.C., Zvacek, S., Uhomoibhi, J. (eds.) CSEDU 2019. CCIS, vol. 1220, pp. 191–210. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58459-7_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattia Monga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bellettini, C., Lonati, V., Monga, M., Morpurgo, A. (2022). How is Two Better Than One? An Observational Study on the Impact of Working in Pairs When Solving Bebras Tasks. In: Bollin, A., Futschek, G. (eds) Informatics in Schools. A Step Beyond Digital Education. ISSEP 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13488. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15851-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15851-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15850-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15851-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics