Skip to main content

State Transition in Multi-agent Epistemic Domains Using Answer Set Programming

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13416))

  • 587 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we develop a state transition function for partially observable multi-agent epistemic domains and implement it using Answer Set Programming (ASP). The transition function computes the next state upon an occurrence of a single action. Thus it can be used as a module in epistemic planners. Our transition function incorporates ontic, sensing and announcement actions and allows for arbitrary nested belief formulae and general common knowledge. A novel feature of our model is that upon an action occurrence, an observing agent corrects his (possibly wrong) initial beliefs about action precondition and his observability. By examples, we show that this step is necessary for robust state transition. We establish some properties of our state transition function regarding its soundness in updating beliefs of agents consistent with their observability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Details of state transition in these examples can be found in our online appendix at https://github.com/yizmirlioglu/Epistemic.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/yizmirlioglu/Epistemic.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/yizmirlioglu/Epistemic.

References

  1. Baltag, A., Moss, L.: Logics for epistemic programs. Synthese (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baltag, A., Moss, L., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions. In: 7th TARK, pp. 43–56 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baral, C., Gelfond, G., Pontelli, E., Son, T.C.: An action language for reasoning about beliefs in multi-agent domains. In: Proceedings of NMR (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baral, C., Gelfond, G., Pontelli, E., Son, T.C.: An action language for multi-agent domains. Artif. Intell. 302, 103601 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Baral, C., Gelfond, G., Son, T.C., Pontelli, E.: Using answer set programming to model multi-agent scenarios involving agents’ knowledge about other’s knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 259–266 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benthem, J.V., Eijck, J.V., Kooi, B.P.: Logics of communication and change. Inf. Comput. 204(11), 1620–1662 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckingham, D., Kasenberg, D., Scheutz, M.: Simultaneous representation of knowledge and belief for epistemic planning with belief revision, 172–181 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2020/18

  8. Burigana, A., Fabiano, F., Dovier, A., Pontelli, E.: Modelling multi-agent epistemic planning in asp. Theory Pract. Logic Program. 20(5), 593–608 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cabalar, P., Fandinno, J., del Cerro, L.F.: Dynamic epistemic logic with asp updates: application to conditional planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10621 (2019)

  10. Ditmarsch, H.V., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic, 1st edn. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fagin, R., Halpern, J., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.: Reasoning About Knowledge. MIT Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: Kowalski, R., Bowen, K. (eds.) Logic Programming: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference and Symposium, pp. 1070–1080 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Gen. Comput. 365–387 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lifschitz, V.: Answer Set Programming. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24658-7

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pontelli, E., Son, T.C., Baral, C., Gelfond, G.: Answer set programming and planning with knowledge and world-altering actions in multiple agent domains. In: Erdem, E., Lee, J., Lierler, Y., Pearce, D. (eds.) Correct Reasoning. LNCS, vol. 7265, pp. 509–526. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30743-0_35

  16. Rajaratnam, D., Thielscher, M.: Representing and reasoning with event models for epistemic planning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, vol. 18, pp. 519–528 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tu, P.H., Son, T.C., Baral, C.: Reasoning and planning with sensing actions, incomplete information, and static causal laws using answer set programming. Theory Pract. Logic Program. 7(4), 377–450 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors have been partially supported by NSF grants 2151254, 1914635 and 1757207. Tran Cao Son was also partially supported by NSF grant 1812628.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuf Izmirlioglu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Izmirlioglu, Y., Pham, L., Son, T.C., Pontelli, E. (2022). State Transition in Multi-agent Epistemic Domains Using Answer Set Programming. In: Gottlob, G., Inclezan, D., Maratea, M. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13416. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15707-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15707-3_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15706-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15707-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics