Abstract
Businesses and communities have long realized that wider societal changes are needed to ensure a balance among economic growth, respect for the environment, and social justice. It is argued that while top-down policy implementations can help, these changes must start with individual action, knowledge, and the capacity and willingness to act, which is shaped by one’s skills, values, and attitude (Napal et al., 2020). Toward this, the six principles of responsible management education (PRME), promoted by the UN Global Compact, encompass clearly defined purpose, values, method, research, partnership, and dialog in management education (Avelar et al., 2019; Haertle et al., 2017). PRME represents the single largest compact among management-related HEIs the world over with a significant overlap with the institutions recognized by leading accreditation bodies and representation from across the globe. These principles help higher education institutes (HEIs) engage in management education to develop curricula and other interventions that commit to the development of necessary skills and capabilities in the future generation of managerial workforces to develop an inclusive and sustainable global economy. However, critical assessment of PRME indicates that in its current form, PRME may not encourage critical reflexivity that is essential for an open-ended process of deliberations to generate social transformation (Millar & Koning, 2018; Millar & Price, 2018). Nonetheless, the broad principles of PRME allow HEIs to develop context-specific interventions. A recent survey of UN PRME signatory HEIs shows that institutes have taken vastly different approaches and demonstrate different levels of maturity in regard to implementing RME (de Assumpção & Neto, 2020). The pedagogical approaches adopted by HEIs range from project/problem-based learning (in an organization/community) and apprenticeships with organizations to classroom-based case study discussions (Evans, 2019).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
While SEVA is an acronym here, in Sanskrit and other Indic languages, Seva means service.
- 2.
The Faculty Advisory System (FAS) consists of faculty mentors advising 10 students on academic and career matters for the duration of two years postgraduate management program.
References
Avelar, A. B. A., da Silva-Oliveira, K. D., & da Silva Pereira, R. (2019). Education for advancing the implementation of the sustainable development goals: A systematic approach. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(3), 100322.
Backman, M., Pitt, H., Marsden, T., Mehmood, A., & Mathijs, E. (2019). Experiential approaches to sustainability education: toward learning landscapes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(1), 139–156.
Borglund, T., Prenkert, F., Frostenson, M., Helin, S., & Du Rietz, S. (2019). External facilitators as ‘Legitimizers’ in designing a master’s program in sustainable business at a Swedish business school—A typology of industry collaborator roles in RME. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(3), 100315.
de Assumpção, M. R., & Neto, M. P. M. (2020). State-of-the-art practices being reported by the PRME champions group: A reference to advance education for sustainable development. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(2), 100369.
Evans, T. L. (2019). Competencies and pedagogies for sustainability education: A roadmap for sustainability studies program development in colleges and universities. Sustainability, 11(19), 5526.
Glasser, H., & Hirsh, J. (2016). Toward the development of robust learning for sustainability core competencies. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, 9(3), 121–134.
Haertle, J., Parkes, C., Murray, A., & Hayes, R. (2017). PRME: Building a global movement on responsible management education. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 66–72.
Hermann, R. R., & Bossle, M. B. (2020). Bringing an entrepreneurial focus to sustainability education: A teaching framework based on content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 119038.
Herranen, J., Vesterinen, V. M., & Aksela, M. (2018). From learner-centered to learner-driven sustainability education. Sustainability, 10(7), 2190.
Millar, J., & Koning, J. (2018). From capacity to capability? Rethinking the PRME agenda for inclusive development in management education. African Journal of Business Ethics, 12(1).
Millar, J., & Price, M. (2018). Imagining management education: A critique of the contribution of the United Nations PRME to critical reflexivity and rethinking management education. Management Learning, 49(3), 346–362.
Napal, M., Mendióroz-Lacambra, A. M., & Penalva, A. (2020). Sustainability teaching tools in the digital age. Sustainability, 12(8), 3366.
Wiek, A., Bernstein, M., Foley, R., Cohen, M., Forrest, N., Kuzdas, C., Kay, B., & Keeler, L. W. (2015). Operationalizing competencies in higher education for sustainable development. In Handbook of higher education for sustainable development (pp. 241–260). Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Das, A., Haritas, I. (2023). Society, Environment, Value, and Attitude: A Study on the Effectiveness of Digital Platforms in Enhancing the Sustainability Perspectives of Management Students. In: Hauser, C., Amann, W. (eds) The Future of Responsible Management Education. Humanism in Business Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15632-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15632-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15631-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15632-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)